Skip to main content

Technology Assessment of Socio-Technical Futures—A Discussion Paper

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present

Summary

Problem: Visions of technology, future scenarios, guiding visions (Leitbilder) represent imaginations of future states of affairs that play a functional role in processes of technological research, development and innovation—e.g. as a means to create attention, communication, coordination, or for the strategic exertion of influence. Since a couple of years there is a growing attention for such imaginations of futures in politics, the economy, research and the civil society. This trend concerns technology assessment (TA) as an observer of these processes and a consultant on the implications of technology and innovation. TA faces increasing demands to assess imaginations of futures that circulate in the present and to participate in shaping these through scenarios or foresights. More than ever, this raises the question, which propositions can be made based on these imaginations by TA and how this can be used in advisory practices. Imaginations of futures are relevant for TA not as predictions but in their significance and effectiveness in the present, which need to be understood and assessed.

Contents: This discussion paper outlines how present significance and effects of imagined futures in technological research and innovation processes can be conceived and analyzed. In this paper, all forms of imaginations of technology futures will be called “socio-technical futures” because within them technological developments and social changes are interwoven and inseparably interrelated. In this paper, we discuss (1) why TA should analyze socio-technical futures, (2) how such analyses can grasp the societal conditions (e.g. power structures) that are expressed in the imagined futures and how these become effective in processes of technology development, communication, decision making etc. We raise the question (3) which self-reflexive positioning or possible realignment of TA is needed as a response to its increased concern with assessing and even co-producing socio-technical futures. The latter is often demanded regarding the growing attention by politics and publics to imaginations of futures with wide temporal and spatial reach.

Addressee of this paper is the TA community in a broader sense. The aim is to sensitize colleagues for the topic and its challenges, to consolidate discussions and to provide theoretical and methodical suggestions for research in TA and related advisory practices with respect to socio-technical futures. This paper has been originally initiated during the workshop “The present of technological futures-theoretical and methodical challenges for Technology Assessment” (March 2016, Karlsruhe), in which all of the paper’s authors participated. The contents of this discussion paper are preliminary results that shall initiate and guide further discussions.

This chapter contains the translation of the German version of a discussion paper collectively developed in the context of a workshop of scholars from the fields of technology assessment, innovation analysis, science and technology studies (STS) and foresight. The German version has been published in December 2016 online (see: http://www.itz.kit.edu/112.php) and was discussed widely in the German speaking TA community.

A. Lösch, K. Böhle, C. Coenen, P. Dobroc, A. Ferrari, R. Heil, D. Hommrich, M. Sand, and C. Schneider have been the editorial staff of the ITAS-project “Visions as socio-epistemic practices” (https://www.itas.kit.edu/english/projects_loes14_luv.php).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Readings

On Sections 1 and 2

  • Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters: Action, knowledge, ethics. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banse, G., Grunwald, A., Hronszky, I., & Nelson, G. (Eds.). (2011). On prospective technology studies (KIT Scientific Reports 7599). Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhle, K. (2015). Desorientierung der TA oder Orientierungsgewinn? Einige Anmerkungen zum Vorschlag, die TA hermeneutisch zu erweitern. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 24(3), 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., Rappert, B., & Webster, A. (Eds.). (2000). Contested futures: A sociology of prospective techno-science. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gransche, B. (2015). Vorausschauendes Denken. Philosophie und Zukunftsforschung jenseits von Statistik und Kalkül. Bielefeld: Transkript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. (2012). Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. (2013). Techno-visionary sciences. Challenges to policy advice. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9(2), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. (2015). Die hermeneutische Erweiterung der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 24(2), 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity. Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann, A. (2007). If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. NanoEthics, 1(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann, A. (2010). A forensics of wishing: Technology assessment in the age of technoscience. Poiesis & Praxis, 7(1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2015). Antizipation von Zukunft zwischen Verwissenschaftlichung und Storytelling. In S. Azzouni, S. Böschen, & C. Reinhardt (Eds.), Erzählung und Geltung. Wissenschaft zwischen Autorschaft und Autorität (pp. 363–384). Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M. S. (2015). Special issue: Future moves in culture, society and technology. Poiesis & Praxis, 63(2), 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selin, C. (2008). The sociology of the future. Tracing stories of technology and time. Sociology Compass, 2(6), 1878–1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torgersen, H. (2013). TA als hermeneutische Unternehmung. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 22(2), 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

On Section 3

  • Alvial Palavicino, C. (2016). Mindful anticipation. A practice approach to the study of emergent technologies. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (2013). The future as cultural fact. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aykut, S. (2015). Energy futures from the social market economy to the Energiewende. The politicization of West German energy debates, 1950–1990. In J. Andersson & E. Rindzevičiūtė (Eds.), Forging the future (pp. 63–91). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (2013). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations in the economy. Theory and Society, 42(3), 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhle, K., & Bopp, K. (2014). What a vision: The artificial companion. A piece of vision assessment including an expert survey. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 10(1), 155–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickel, S., & Schrape, J.-F. (2015). Dezentralisierung, Demokratisierung, Emanzipation. Zur Architektur des digitalen Technikutopismus. Leviathan, 43(3), 442–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieckhoff, C., Appelrath, H.-J., Fischedick, M., Grunwald, A., Höffler, F., Mayer, C., et al. (2014). Zur Interpretation von Energieszenarien. Schriftenreihe Energiesysteme der Zukunft. München: acatech-Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften e. V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes, M., Hoffman, U., & Marz, L. (1992). Leitbild und Technik. Zur Entstehung und Steuerung technischer Innovationen. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geideck, S., & Liebert, W.-A. (Eds.). (2003). Sinnformeln. Linguistische und soziologische Analysen von Leitbildern, Metaphern und anderen kollektiven Orientierungsmustern. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J., & Grunwald, A. (Eds.). (2000). Vision assessment: Shaping technology in 21st century society. Towards a repertoire for technology assessment. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, K., Markard, J., Ruef, A., & Truffer, B. (2012). Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1084–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, K.-H., Warnke, P., & Rhomberg, W. (2016). New forms of innovation. Critical issues for future pathways. Foresight, 18(3), 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lösch, A. (2013). Vision Assessment zu Human-Enhancement-Technologien. Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zu einer Analytik von Visionen im Kontext gesellschaftlicher Kommunikationsprozesse. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 22(1), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lösch, A. (2014). Die diskursive Konstruktion einer Technowissenschaft. Wissenssoziologische Analytik am Beispiel der Nanotechnologie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösch, A., & Schneider, C. (2016). Transforming power/knowledge apparatuses: The smart grid in the German energy transition. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(3), 262–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, D. (2013). Computersimulationen in politischen Entscheidungsprozessen: Zur Politikrelevanz von Simulationswissen am Beispiel der CO2-Speicherung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, D., & Renn, O. (2014). Public perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate. Climatic Change, 125(3–4), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (2013). Scenarios as patterns of orientation in technology development and technology assessment. Outline of a research program. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9(1), 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Schaeffer, I., & Meister, M. (2015). How situational scenarios guide technology development-Some insights from research on ubiquitous computing. In D. M. Bowman, A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. Guivant, K. Konrad, H. van Lente, & S. Woll (Eds.), Practices of innovation and responsibility. Insights from methods, governance and action (pp. 165–179). Heidelberg: AKA/IOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • te Kulve, H., Konrad, K., Alvial Palavicino, C., & Walhout, B. (2013). Context matters: Promises and concerns regarding nanotechnologies for water and food applications. NanoEthics, 7(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnke, P., & Schirrmeister, E. (2016). Small seeds for grand challenges—Exploring disregarded seeds of change in a foresight process for RTI policy. Futures, 77, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentland, A. (2016). Imagining and enacting the future of the German energy transition: Electric vehicles as grid infrastructure. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(3), 285–302.

    Google Scholar 

On Section 4

  • Ahlqvist, T., & Rhisiart, M. (2015). Emerging pathways for critical futures research: Changing contexts and impacts of social theory. Futures, 71, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, C., & Simakova, E. (2013). STS policy interactions, technology assessment and the governance of technovisionary sciences. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9(2), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickel, S. (2013). Die Regulierung der Zukunft. “Emerging Technologies” und das Problem der Exklusion des Spekulativen. In A. Bora, A. Henkel, & C. Reinhardt (Eds.), Wissensregulierung und Regulierungswissen (pp. 201–218). Weilerswist: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieckhoff, C. (2015). Modellierte Zukunft-Energieszenarien in der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Bielefeld: Transkript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A. (2008). Technik und Politikberatung. Philosophische Perspektiven. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, K., Stegmaier, P., Rip, A., & Kuhlmann, S. (2014). Constructive technology assessment-Antizipation Modulieren als Teil der Governance von Innovation. In M. Löw (Ed.), Vielfalt und Zusammenhalt. Verhandlungen des 36. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Bochum und Dortmund 2012. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus (CD-Rom).

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, K., van Lente, H., Groves, C., & Selin, C. (2016). Performing and governing the future in science and technology. In C. A. Miller, U. Felt, R. Fouché, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (4th ed., pp. 465–493). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCray, W. P. (2012). The visioneers: How a group of elite scientists pursued space colonies, nanotechnologies, and a limitless future. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann, A. (2013). Visioneering assessment: On the construction of tunnel visions for technovisionary research and policy. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, 9(2), 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann, A. (2014). Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poli, R. (2014). Anticipation: What about turning the human and social sciences upside down? Futures, 64, 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A. (2012). Futures of technology assessment. In M. Decker, A. Grunwald, & M. Knapp (Eds.), Der Systemblick auf Innovation. Technikfolgenabschätzung in der Technikgestaltung (pp. 29–42). Berlin: Sigma.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2006). Governance von Zukunftsversprechen: Zur politischen Ökonomie der Nanotechnologie. PROKLA, 145, 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2013). The role of future-oriented technology analysis in the governance of emerging technologies: The example of nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C., & Lösch, A. (2015). What about your futures, Technology Assessment? An Essay on how to take the visions of TA seriously, motivated by the PACITA conference. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis, 24(2), 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1996). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54, 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J., & Steinmüller, W. E. (2016). Framing innovation policy for transformative change: Innovation policy 3.0. Brighton: University of Sussex. http://www.johanschot.com/publications/framing-innovation-policy-for-transformative-change-innovation-policy-3-0/.

  • Suchman, L., & Bishop, L. (2000). Problematizing ‘Innovation’ as a critical project. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(3), 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. M., Amanatidou, E., Erdmann, L., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Research and innovation futures. Exploring new ways of doing and organizing knowledge creation. Foresight, 18(3), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Lösch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lösch, A. et al. (2019). Technology Assessment of Socio-Technical Futures—A Discussion Paper. In: Lösch, A., Grunwald, A., Meister, M., Schulz-Schaeffer, I. (eds) Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27155-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics