Skip to main content
Log in

Aśoka’s Disparagement of Domestic Ritual and Its Validation by the Brahmins

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his edicts, the emperor Aśoka Maurya extols brāhmaṇas, usually alongside ascetics (śramaṇas), as deserving honor and generosity, though he never alludes to their connection with ritual, the central theme of early Brahmanical literature. On the other hand, in Rock Edicts I and IX, he disparages sacrifices, and ceremonies performed by women, advocating instead the practice of ethical virtues. Close attention to the wording of Rock Edict IX shows that Aśoka and the Brahmanical Gṛhyasūtras talk about domestic rites in very similar terms, even describing them with the same adjective (uccāvaca). Both of them note the special role of women as a source of knowledge of such ceremonies, and differ only in how they evalute the value of such ceremonial: Aśoka disparages women’s rites, while some Gṛhyasūtras explicitly validate women as authorities in such matters. A comparison of these sources highlights the distinctive role of the term dhamma in Aśoka’s usage (in contrast to maṅgala (auspicious folk rites), and may provide some guidance for dating the Gṛhyasūtras. The fact that Aśoka does not explicitly connect such rites with the brāhmaṇas suggests that in his experience at least (i.e., in Magadha) Brahmins’ religious authority had nothing to do with domestic ritual. We may conclude that the Vedic canonization of Gṛhya ritual norms was not yet recognized outside of priestly circles, if it had developed yet at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, P.K. (1990). Studies in the Minor Rock Edicts of Aśoka. I. Critical Edition. Freibufg: Hedwig Falk.

  • ĀpDhS = Olivelle 2000.

  • ĀpGS = Āpastambag̥rhyasūtra with Two Commentaries, the Anâkulâ of Haradatta Misra and the Tâtparyadarsana of Sudarsanâchârya, edited by A. Chinnaswami Sastri. Kashi Sanskrit Series, 59. Benares: Vidya Vilas Press, 1928.

  • ĀśvGS = Indische Hausregeln, I. Āśvalāyaṇa, ed. A. F. Stenzler, Abhandlungen der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 3(4), 1864; and in BI, 1866–1869.

  • BĀU = Olivelle 1998.

  • Bloch, J. (1950). Les inscriptions d’Asoka, traduites et commentées. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronkhorst, J. (2007). Greater Magadha: Studies in the culture of early India. Handbook of oriental studies, Sect. 2, 19. Leiden: Brill.

  • Bronkhorst, J. (2011). Brahmanism in the shadow of Buddhism. Handbook of oriental studies, Sect. 2, 24. Leiden: Brill.

  • Caillat, C. (1974). Pāli ibbha, Vedic íbhya-. In L. Cousins, A. Kunsf, & K. R. Norman (Eds.), Buddhist studies in honour of I.B. Horner (pp. 41–49). Boston: Reidel.

  • ChU = Olivelle 1998.

  • Cone, M. (2001). A dictionary of Pāli, Part I, a–kh. Oxford: Pali Text Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, E. B., & Rouse, W. H. D. (Trans.). (1907). The Jātaka, or stories of the Buddha’s former births (Vol. 6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Dīghanikāya = Dīghanikāya, edited by T. W. Rhys Davids and J. E. Carpenter. London: Pali Text Society, 1890–1911.

  • Falk, H. (2006). Aśokan sites and artefacts: A source-book with bibliography. Monographien zur Indischen Archäologie, Kunst und Philologie, 18. Mainz am Rhein: Verlag Philipp von Zabern.

  • Hultzsch, E. (1925). Inscriptions of Aśoka. New edition. Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press for the Government of India. Reprint, New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India, 1991.

  • Jātaka = The Jātaka Together with Its Commentary, vol. 5, edited by V. FausbØll. London: Kegan Paul, 1891.

  • Kangle, R. P. (1972). The Kauṭilīya Arthaśāstra, 3 vols. Bombay: Bombay University.

  • Karttunen, K. (1989). India in early Greek literature. Studia Orientalia, 65. Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society.

  • Karttunen, K. (1997). India and the Hellenistic world. Studia Orientalia, 83. Helsinki: Finnish Oriental Society.

  • Lubin, T. (2005). The transmission, patronage, and prestige of Brahmanical piety from the Mauryas to the Guptas. In F. Squarcini (Ed.), Boundaries, dynamics and construction of traditions in South Asia (pp. 77–103). Kykéion studi e testi. I, Scienze delle religioni, 3. Firenze: Firenze University Press.

  • Lubin, T. (2013). Customary practice in the vedic ritual codes as an emergent dharma principle. Paper for the 223rd meeting of the American Oriental Society, Portland, OR.

  • McCrindle, J. W. (1926). Ancient India as described by Megasthenes and Arrian; being a translation of the fragments of the Indika of Megasthenês collected by Dr. Schwanbeck, and the first part of the Indika of Arrian, 2d ed. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Co./Bombay: Thacker & Co./London: Trübner & Co.

  • McCrindle, J. W. (1901). Ancient India as described in classical literature; being a collection of Greek and Latin texts relating to India, extracted from Herodotus, Strabo, Plinius, Aelianus, Kosmas, Bardesanes, Porphyrios, Strobaios, Dion Chrysostom, Dionysios, Philostratos, Nonnos, Diodorus Siculus, the itinerary and romance history of Alexander and other works. Westminster: A. Constable and Co. (reprint, Amsterdam: Philo Press, 1971).

  • Norman, K. R. (1966). Middle Indo-Aryan studies VI. Journal of the Oriental Institute (Baroda), 16, 113–119 (Rep. in: Collected papers (Vol. 1, pp. 77–84). London: Pali Text Society, 1990).

  • Olivelle, P. (1998). The early Upaniṣads. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Olivelle, P. (2000). Dharmasūtras. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

  • Olivelle, P. (2012). Aśoka’s inscriptions as text and ideology. In P. Olivelle, J. Leoshko, & H. P. Ray (Eds.), Reimagining Aśoka: Memory and history (pp. 157–194). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

  • PGS = Grihya-Sūtra by Paraskar with Five Commentaries of Karka Upādhyāya, Jayarām, Harihar, Gadādhar and Vishvanāth, ed. Mahādev Gangādhar Bākre. Bombay: Gujarari Printing Press, 1917; rep. Delhi: MM, 1982.

  • Rhys Davids, T. W. (Trans.). (1899). Dialogues of the Buddha, vol.1. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Rhys Davids, T. W., & Stede, W. (1921–1925). The Pali Text Society’s Pali-English dictionary. Chipstead: Pali Text Society.

  • ŚB = The C̜atapatha-Brâhmaṇa in the Mâdhyandina-C̜âkhâ, 5 vols., ed. Albrecht Weber. Bombay: Laxmi Venkateshwar Steam Press, 1855.

  • Silk, J. (2000). The Yogācāra Bhikṣu. In J. Silk (Ed.), Wisdom, compassion, and the search for understanding: The Buddhist studies legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao (pp. 265–314). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

  • Sircar, D. C. (1979). Aśokan studies. Calcutta: Indian Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • TS = Die Taittirīya-Saṃhitā, 2 vols., ed. Albrecht Weber. Leipzig, 1871–1872.

  • Wezler, A. (1985). Dharma und Deśadharma. In H. Kulke & D. Rothermund (Eds.), Regionale Traditionen in Südasien (pp. 1–22). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzel, M. (1985). Regionale und Überregionale Faktoren in der Entwicklung vedischer Brahmanengruppen in Mittelalter (Materialien zu den vedischen Schulen, 5). In H. Kulke & D. Rothermund (Eds.), Regionale tradition in Südasien (pp. 37–76). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzel, M. (1987). On the localisation of vedic texts and schools (Materials on Vedic Śākhās, 7). In G. Pollet (Ed.), India and the ancient world (pp. 173–213). Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta, 25. Leuven: Departement Oriëntalistiek.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Lubin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lubin, T. Aśoka’s Disparagement of Domestic Ritual and Its Validation by the Brahmins. J Indian Philos 41, 29–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9173-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9173-8

Keywords

Navigation