Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: A metaphorical approach to ethics

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

If we were only to govern our actions by the reflection of the inert world's irrevocable laws in our own consciousness, we would be completely unmoral, or to put it better, amoral; Good and Bad would lack meaning for us... A. Caso A System is an imaginary machine... A. Smith

Abstract

This paper tackles the main changes that have taken place in the mechanical worldview of simple, self-regulating and intelligent machines, and studies their repercussions at the ethical and organisational level. These views of machines agree with the scientific, human-relations and postmodern proposals in organisation theory, in that they are in fact reflections on human nature which depend on metaphorical devices within which the machine metaphor is central.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aglietta, Michel (1979),Regulación y crisis del capitalismo, Siglo XXI, Mexico.

  • Alberoni, Francesco (1992),Las razones de bien y del mal, Gedisa, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, Masahiko (1990),La estructura de la economíca japonesa, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlan, Henri (1991),Con razón y sin ella. Intercritica de la Ciencia y del Mito, Tusquets, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubert Nicole and Vincent de Gaulejac (1991),Le coût de l'excellence, Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baritz, Loren (1974),The Servants of Power: A History of the Use of Social Science in American Industry, Greenwood Press, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, jean (1983),Les stratégies fatales, Bernard Grasset, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, Harry (1974)Labor and Monopoly Capital, Monthly Review, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Tom and G.M. Stalker (1961),The Management of Innovation, Tavistock Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, Fritjof (1982),The Turning Point: science, society, and the rising culture, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caso, Antonio (1910), “La filosofía moral de don Eugenio M. de Hostos”, in Conferences de Ateneo de la Juventud, Mexico. Quoted by Zea, Leopoldo (1993),El postitivismo en México: nacimento, apogeo y decadenica, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico.

  • Castoriadis, Cornelius (1975)L'institution imaginaire de la Société, Seuil, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, Stewart R. (1981), “Organization and Control”,in Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 546–562.

  • Clegg, Stewart R. (1990),Modern Organizations. Organizations Studies in the Postmodernist World, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robert (1989), “Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 3: The Contribution of Jaque Derrida”, inOrganization Studies, 10/4, pp. 479–502.

  • Cooper, Robert and Gibson Burrel (1988), “Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis: An Introduction”, inOrganization Studies, 9/1, pp. 91–112.

  • Coriat, Benjamin (1979),L'atalier et le chronométre, Essai sur le taylorism, le fordisme et la production de masse, Christian Bourjois Editeur, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarzèz, Pieerre (1983) “La sociologie industrielle. Fille de la thermodynamique d'équilibre?, inSociologie du Travail, No. 3, pp. 261–274.

  • Durkheim Emile (1987)La división social del trabajo, Colofón, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focault, Michel (1971)L'ordre du discours, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedman, Georges (1963),Où ve la travail humain?, Idées/Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Georges (1977),La crisis de progresso, Laia, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaos, José (1992),Historia de nuestra idea del mundo, Fondo de Cultura Económica/El Colegio de México, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony (1978),Durkheim, Fontana, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Lawrence J. (1970),On the Social System, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heydebrand, Wolf V. (1989), “New Organizational Form”, inWork and Occupations, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 13–31.

  • Homans, George C. (1959)The Human Group, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, Martin (1993) “Deconstructing Organizations”, inAcademy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 13–31.

  • Legborgne, Danile and Alain Lipietz (1988), “L'après-fordisme et son espace”, inLes Temps Modernes, No. 501, abrill, pp. 75–110.

  • Lyotard, Jean François (1989),La condition postmoderne, Editions du Minuit, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. and Herbert A. Simon (1958),Organization, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, Elton (1933),The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Harvard University, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, Elton (1945),The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Harvard University, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorduck, Pamela (1993), “Intelligencia artificial: an aperçu”, in Graubard Stephen R. (ed.),El nuevo debate sobre la inteligenica articial. Sistemas simbólicos y redes neuronales, Gedisa, Barcelona, pp. 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaño Hirose, Luis (1985), “Las esculas de las relaciones humanas: premisas para un debate”, in Ibarra Colado, Eduardo and Luis Montaño Hirose (eds.),Historia del pensamiento administrativo, vol. I, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico, pp. 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaño Hirose, Luis (1985), “Las nuevas relaciones-humanas: un falso reto a la democracia,” inEnsayos críticos para el estudio de las organizaciones en México, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico, pp. 63–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaño Hirose, Luis (1987), “El orden sistémico: algunos avatares del paradigma organizacional”, in Ibarra Colado, Eduardo and Luis Montaño Hirose (eds.),El orden organizacional: poder, estrategia y contradicción, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico, pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaño Hirose, Luis (1993), “De la metáfora al poder. Algunas reflexiones acera de las aproximaciones organizacionales a la educación superior”, in Ibarra Colado, Eduardo (Ed.),La universidad ante el espejo de la excelencia. Enjuegos organiacionales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalaga, Mexico, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaño Hirose, Luis (1994), “At the Edge of Modernity: Boundaries Mediations and Overlappings. The Lessons of the Japanese Organization” inOsaka City University Business Journal, pp. 35–57.

  • Morin, Edgar (1981),El Método: la naturaleza de la naturaleza, Cátedra, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newel, Allan and Herbert A. Simon (1972),Human Problems Solving, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, William (1984),The M-Form Society: How American Teamwork Can Recapture the Competitive Edge, Addison Wesley, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagés, Max, Michel Bonetti, Vincent de Gaulejac and Daniel Decendre (1979),L'emprise de L'organisation. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Martin (1992a), “Post-Modern Organizations or Post-Modern Organization Theory?” inOrganization Studies, 13/1 pp. 1–17.

  • Parker, Martin (1992b), “Getting Down from the Fence: A Reply to Harimodus Tsoukas”, inOrganization Studies, 13/4, pp/ 651–653.

  • Putnam, Hilary (1993), “Mucho ruido por muy poco” in Graubard Stephen R. (ed.),El nuevo debate sobre la inteligencia artificial. Sistemas simbólicos y redes neuronales, Gedisa, Barcelona, pp. 306–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, Fritz and William Dickson (1976),Management and the Worker, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1977),La nueva ciencia de la decisión gerencial El Ateneo, Buenos Aires.

  • Smith, Adam (1937),An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, The Modern Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam (1976),The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Liberty Classics, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, Ken (1992), “Durkheim and Organizational Analysis”, inOrganization Studies, 13/4, p. 627–642.

  • Taylor, Frederick W. (1972),Scientific Management: Shop Management. The Principles of Scientific Management. Testimony Before the Special Committee., Greenwood Connecticut.

  • Tsoukas, Haridimos (1992), “Postmodernism, Reflexive Rationalism and Organizational Studies: A Reply to Martin Parker”, inOrganization Studies, 13/4, pp. 643–649.

  • Waltz, David L. (1993), “Perspectives de la construcción de máquinas verdaderamente inteligentes” in Graubard, Stephen R. (ed.),El nuevo debate sobre la inteligencia artificial. Sistemas simbólicos y redes neuronales, Gedisa, Barcelona, pp. 218–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Norbert (1969),Cybernetics. Or control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Norbert (1966),Ex-prodigy. My Childhood and Youth, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico

    Luis Montaño Hirose

Authors
  1. Luis Montaño Hirose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirose, L.M. Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: A metaphorical approach to ethics. AI & Soc 9, 43–56 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174478

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174478

Keywords

Search

Navigation