Maria Luce Lupetti
ABSTRACT
Interest in design methods and tools has been steadily growing in HRI. Yet, design is not acknowledged as a discipline with specific epistemology and methodology. Designerly HRI work is validated through user studies which, we argue, provide a limited account of the knowledge design produces. This paper aims to broaden current understanding of designerly HRI work and its contributions by unpacking what designerly knowledge is and how to produce it. Through a critical analysis of current HRI design literature, we identify a lack of work dedicated to understanding the conceptual implications of robotic artifacts. These, in fact, are implicit carriers of crucial HRI knowledge that can challenge established assumptions about how a robot should look, act, and be like. We conclude by discussing a set of practices desirable to legitimize designerly HRI work, and calling for further research addressing the conceptual implications designerly HRI work.
- David Sirkin, Nik Martelaro, Hamish Tennent, Mishel Johns, Brian Mok, Wendy Ju, Guy Hoffman, Heather Knight, Bilge Mutlu, and Leila Takayama. 2016. Design Skills for HRI. In the Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). IEEE Press, 581--582. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451866Google Scholar
- Holmquist and Forlizzi. 2014. Special Issue on Design in HRI: Past, Present, and Future. J. Hum-Robot Interact. 3, 1 (February 2014).Google Scholar
- Cross, Nigel. 1982. Designerly ways of knowing. Design studies 3, no. 4, p.p. 221--227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142--694X(82)90040-0Google Scholar
- Bartneck, C., Belpaeme, T., Eyssel, F., Kanda, T., Keijsers, M., & Sabanovic, S. (2020). Human-Robot Interaction -- An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Löwgren Jonas. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge. interactions 20, 1 (January + February 2013), 30--34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2405716.2405725Google Scholar
- Barendregt Wolmet, Olof Torgersson, Eva Eriksson, and Peter Börjesson. 2017. Intermediate-Level Knowledge in Child-Computer Interaction: A Call for Action. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7--16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079719Google Scholar
- Höök Kristina and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362371Google Scholar
- Kirsh David. 2005. Metacognition, distributed cognition and visual design. Cognition, education, and communication technology, p.p. 147--180.Google Scholar
- Redström, Johan. 2017. Making design theory. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Horvath, Imre. 2008. Differences between'research in design context'and'design inclusive research'in the domain of industrial design engineering. Journal of Design Research 7, no. 1, 61--83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dalsgaard, Peter. 2017. Instruments of inquiry: Understanding the nature and role of tools in design. International Journal of Design 11, no. 1.Google Scholar
- John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493--502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver William. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 937--946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538Google Scholar
- Stappers Pieter Jan and Giaccardi Elisa. 2017. Research through Design. In the Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed, Chapter 43, Interaction Design Foundation.Google Scholar
- Schon, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner, Taylor & Francis, London, Temple Smith.Google Scholar
- Giaccardi, Elisa, Chris Speed, Nazli Cila, and Melissa Caldwell. 2016. Things as co-ethnographers: Implications of a thing perspective for design and anthropology." Design Anthropological Futures 235.Google Scholar
- Koskinen, Ilpo, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redstrom, and Stephan Wensveen. 2011. Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Wensveen, Stephan, and Ben Matthews. 2015. Prototypes and prototyping in design research. The Routledge Companion to Design Research. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (PDC '08). Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA, p.p. 92--101.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Szafir, Daniel, Bilge Mutlu, and Terrence Fong. 2015. Communicating directionality in flying robots. In 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'15), Portland, USA, p.p. 19--26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696475Google Scholar
- McCallum, Louis, and Peter W. McOwan. 2015. Face the music and glance: How nonverbal behaviour aids human robot relationships based in music. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'15), Portland, USA. p.p. 237--244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696477Google Scholar
- Harrison Anthony M., Wendy M. Xu, and J. Gregory Trafton. 2018. User-Centered Robot Head Design: a Sensing Computing Interaction Platform for Robotics Research (SCIPRR). In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Chicago, USA, p.p. 215--223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171283Google Scholar
- Gomez Randy, Deborah Szapiro, Kerl Galindo, and Keisuke Nakamura. 2018. Haru: Hardware Design of an Experimental Tabletop Robot Assistant. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'18). Chicago, USA, p.p. 233--240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171288Google Scholar
- Moharana Sanika, Alejandro E. Panduro, Hee Rin Lee, and Laurel D. Riek. 2019. Robots for joy, robots for sorrow: community based robot design for dementia caregivers. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'19). Daegu, Republic of Korea, p.p. 458--467. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673206Google Scholar
- Cheon EunJeong and Norman Makoto Su. 2018. Futuristic Autobiographies: Weaving Participant Narratives to Elicit Values around Robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Chicago, USA, p.p. 388--397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171244Google Scholar
- Lee Hee Rin, EunJeong Cheon, Maartje de Graaf, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Cristina Zaga, and James Young. 2019. Robots for social good: exploring critical design for HRI. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '19). Daegu, Republic of Korea, p.p. 681--682. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673130Google Scholar
- Murray-Rust, D., and von Jungenfeld, R. 2017. Thinking through robotic imaginaries. 3rd Biennial Research through Design Conference, Edinburg, UK.Google Scholar
- Lupetti Maria Luce. 2017. Shybo--design of a research artefact for human-robot interaction studies. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 9(1), 57--69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v9i1.303Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee Wen-Ying and Malte Jung. 2020. Ludic-HRI: Designing Playful Experiences with Robots. In Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'20). Cambridge, UK, p.p. 582--584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3371382.3377429Google Scholar
- Luria, M., Zimmerman, J., & Forlizzi, J. 2019. Championing Research Through Design in HRI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.07572.Google Scholar
- Douglas K. Van Duyne, James Landay, and Jason I. Hong. 2002. The Design of Sites: Patterns, Principles, and Processes for Crafting a Customer-Centered Web Experience. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver Bill and John Bowers. 2012. Annotated portfolios." Interactions 19, no. 4, 40--49.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Sirkin, Brian Mok, Stephen Yang, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'15), Portland, USA p.p. 11--18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696461Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy Hoffman, Oren Zuckerman, Gilad Hirschberger, Michal Luria, and Tal Shani Sherman. 2015. Design and Evaluation of a Peripheral Robotic Conversation Companion. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'15). Portland, USA, 3--10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696495Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cesar Vandevelde and Jelle Saldien. 2016. An Open Platform for the Design of Social Robot Embodiments for Face-to-Face Communication. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16), Christchurch, New Zealand, p.p. 287--294. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451764Google Scholar
- Arzu Guneysu Ozgur, Maximilian Jonas Wessel, Wafa Johal, Kshitij Sharma, Ayberk Özgür, Philippe Vuadens, Francesco Mondada, Friedhelm Christoph Hummel, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2018. Iterative Design of an Upper Limb Rehabilitation Game with Tangible Robots. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Chicago, USA, p.p. 241--250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171262Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meg Tonkin, Jonathan Vitale, Sarita Herse, Mary-Anne Williams, William Judge, and Xun Wang. 2018. Design Methodology for the UX of HRI: A Field Study of a Commercial Social Robot at an Airport. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Chicago, USA, p.p. 407--415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171270Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shiri Azenkot, Catherine Feng, and Maya Cakmak. 2016. Enabling Building Service Robots to Guide Blind People: A Participatory Design Approach. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). Christchurch, New Zealand, p.p. 3--10. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451727Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rea, D. J., and Young, J. E. 2019. Methods and effects of priming a teloperator's perception of robot capabilities. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'19), Daegu, Republic of Korea, p.p. 739--741). DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673186Google Scholar
- Firestone, Justin W., Rubi Quiñones, and Brittany A. Duncan. 2019. Learning from Users: an Elicitation Study and Taxonomy for Communicating Small Unmanned Aerial System States Through Gestures. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'19), Daegu, Republic of Korea, p.p. 163--171. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673010Google Scholar
- Alisa Kalegina, Grace Schroeder, Aidan Allchin, Keara Berlin, and Maya Cakmak. 2018. Characterizing the Design Space of Rendered Robot Faces. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'18). Chicago, USA, p.p. 96--104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171286Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martelaro, Nikolas, Victoria C. Nneji, Wendy Ju, and Pamela Hinds. 2016. Tell me more: Designing hri to encourage more trust, disclosure, and companionship. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI'16), Christchurch, New Zealand, p.p. 181--188. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451750Google Scholar
- Peter Wang, Srinath Sibi, Brian Mok, and Wendy Ju. 2017. Marionette: Enabling On-Road Wizard-of-Oz Autonomous Driving Studies. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'17). Vienna, Austria, p.p. 234--243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020256Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lidwell William, Kritina Holden, and Jill Butler. 2010. Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Pub.Google Scholar
- Del Vleuten et al. 2015. The IoT Manifesto. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from: https://www.iotmanifesto.com/wp-content/themes/Manifesto/Manifesto.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Gurit E. Birnbaum, Moran Mizrahi, Guy Hoffman, Harry T. Reis, Eli J. Finkel, and Omri Sass. 2016. Machines as a Source of Consolation: Robot Responsiveness Increases Human Approach Behavior and Desire for Companionship. In the Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16). Christchurch, New Zealand, p.p. 165--171. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451748Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sichao Song and Seiji Yamada. 2017. Expressing Emotions through Color, Sound, and Vibration with an Appearance-Constrained Social Robot. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'17). Vienna, Austria, p.p. 2--11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020239Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jessica Rebecca Cauchard, Kevin Y. Zhai, Marco Spadafora, and James A. Landay. 2016. Emotion Encoding in Human-Drone Interaction. In the Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI '16) Christchurch, New Zealand, p.p. 263--270. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451761Google Scholar
- Hu Yuhan and Guy Hoffman. 2019. Using Skin Texture Change to Design Emotion Expression in Social Robots. 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'19), Daegu, Republic of Korea. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673012Google Scholar
- Kahn, P. H., Freier, N. G., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ruckert, J. H., Severson, R. L., & Kane, S. K. 2008. Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (HRI'08), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p.p. 97--104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1349822.1349836Google Scholar
- Nielsen Jakob. 2005. Ten usability heuristics.Google Scholar
- Jonathan Vitale, Meg Tonkin, Sarita Herse, Suman Ojha, Jesse Clark, Mary-Anne Williams, Xun Wang, and William Judge. 2018. Be More Transparent and Users Will Like You: A Robot Privacy and User Experience Design Experiment. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Chicago, USA, p.p. 379--387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171269Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scholtz Jean C. 2002. Human-robot interactions: Creating synergistic cyber forces. In Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata, pp. 177--184.Google Scholar
- Weiss, Astrid, Regina Bernhaupt, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2011. The USUS evaluation framework for user-centered HRI. New Frontiers in Human--Robot Interaction 2, 89--110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ais.2.07weiGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Dautenhahn, Kerstin, Bernard Ogden, and Tom Quick. 2002. From embodied to socially embedded agents--implications for interaction-aware robots. Cognitive Systems Research 3, no. 3, 397--428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00050--5Google ScholarDigital Library
- Löwgren Jonas. 2006. Articulating the use qualities of digital designs. Aesthetic computing, 383--403.Google Scholar
- Löwgren Jonas. 2007. Pliability as an experiential quality: Exploring the aesthetics of interaction design. Artifact: Journal of Design Practice 1, no. 2, 85--95.Google Scholar
- Yusuke Kato, Takayuki Kanda, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2015. May I help you? Design of Human-like Polite Approaching Behavior. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696463Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, Jeffrey. 2011. Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice. Interacting with computers, 23.6, p.p. 604--621. DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2011.07.001Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell Jeffrey. 2009. Interaction criticism and aesthetics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, USA, p.p. 2357--2366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519063Google Scholar
- Paul Baxter, James Kennedy, Emmanuel Senft, Severin Lemaignan, and Tony Belpaeme. 2016. From Characterising Three Years of HRI to Methodology and Reporting Recommendations. In the Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (HRI'16). Christchurch, New Zealand, p.p. 391--398. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2016.7451777Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gabriele Trovato, Cesar Lucho, Alexander Huerta-Mercado, and Francisco Cuellar. 2018. Design Strategies for Representing the Divine in Robots. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). Chicago, USA, p.p. 29--35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3173388Google Scholar
- Stolterman Erik and Mikael Wiberg. 2010. Concept-driven interaction design research. Human--Computer Interaction 25, no. 2, p.p. 95--118, Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020903586696Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nelson, Harold G., and Erik Stolterman. 2003. "Design Judgement: Decision-Making in the ?Real'World." The Design Journal 6, no. 1, p.p. 23--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lacey, Cherie, and Catherine Caudwell. 2019. Cuteness as a "Dark Pattern'in Home Robots. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'19), Daegu, Republic of Korea, pp. 374--381. IEEE, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673274Google Scholar
- James Pierce. 2014. On the presentation and production of design research artifacts in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS'14). Vancouver, Canada, p.p. 735--744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598525Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). San Jose, USA, p.p. 493--502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goodrich, Michael A., and Alan C. Schultz. 2008. Human-robot interaction: a survey. Now Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
- William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12). Austin, USA, p.p. 937--946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anderson-Bashan, Lucy, Benny Megidish, Hadas Erel, Iddo Wald, Guy Hoffman, Oren Zuckerman, and Andrey Grishko. 2018. The greeting machine: an abstract robotic object for opening encounters. In 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Nanjing and Tai'an, China, p.p. 595--602. DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525516Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tennent H., S. Shen and M. Jung. 2019. Micbot: A Peripheral Robotic Object to Shape Conversational Dynamics and Team Performance. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'19), Daegu, Republic of Korea, p.p. 133--142. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673013Google Scholar
- Ayberk Özgür, Wafa Johal, Francesco Mondada, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2017. Haptic-Enabled Handheld Mobile Robots: Design and Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'17). Denver, USA, p.p. 2449--2461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025994Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hu, Yuhan, and Guy Hoffman. 2019. Using skin texture change to design emotion expression in social robots. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI'19), Daegu, Republic of Korea, p.p. 2--10. DOI: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673012Google Scholar
- Selma. 2010. Robots in society, society in robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2 (4), p.p. 439--450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0066--7Google Scholar
- Bertelsen, O. W., and Pold, S. 2004. Criticism as an approach to interface aesthetics. In Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, Tampere, Finland, p.p. 23--32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1028014.1028018Google Scholar
- Bowers John. 2012. The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of 'research through design'. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS'12), New Castle, UK, p.p. 68--77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317968Google Scholar
- Hoggenmueller, M., Lee, W. Y., Hespanhol, L., Tomitsch, M., & Jung, M. 2020. Beyond the Robotic Artefact: Capturing Designerly HRI Knowledge through Annotated Portfolios. 1st First international workshop on Designerly HRI Knowledge. Held in conjunction with the 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN'20).Google Scholar
- Luciani, D. T., Lindvall, M., and Löwgren, J. 2018. Machine learning as a design material: a curated collection of exemplars for visual interaction. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th-17th August 2018.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Designerly Ways of Knowing in HRI: Broadening the Scope of Design-oriented HRI Through the Concept of Intermediate-level Knowledge
Recommendations
Learning from robotic artefacts: A quest for strong concepts in Human-Robot Interaction
DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceThis paper is a methodological replication of Barendregt et al. [11], who urged Child-Computer Interaction field to embrace Intermediate Level Knowledge as a meaningful and valid way of generating knowledge. We extend this epistemological gap to the ...
2nd International Workshop on Designerly HRI Knowledge. Reflecting on HRI practices through Annotated Portfolios of Robotic Artefacts
HRI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionWe propose a workshop stemming from ongoing conversations about the role of design methods and designed artefacts within the field of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Given the growing interest in understanding what the field can learn from design ...
Bridging HRI Theory and Practice: Design Guidelines for Robot Communication in Dairy Farming
HRI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionUsing HRI theory to inform robot development is an important, but difficult, endeavor. This paper explores the relationship between HRI theory and HRI practice through a design project on the development of design guidelines for human-robot communication ...
Comments