Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethnomethodologists (or at least many of them) have been reticent about their theoretical sources and methodological principles. It frequently falls to others to make such matters explicit. In this paper I discuss this silence about theory, but rather than entering the breach by specifying a set of implicit assumptions and principles, I suggest that the reticence is consistent with ethnomethodology's distinctive research 'program'. The main part of the paper describes the pedagogical exercises and forms of apprenticeship through which Garfinkel and Sacks aimed to develop ethnomethodology as a practice. These efforts were not entirely successful, partly because ethnomethodological 'practice' required an engagement with other fully-fledged practices. Aside from the difficulties of mastering such practices, it was unclear what an ethnomethodological study would add to, or take from, them. Whether successful or not, ethnomethodological research points to the specificity of discourse and action in any given practice which a general theory is bound to misconstrue. Current disputes about cultural constructivist versions of natural science illustrate the problems that arise when the terms of a general theory are used to describe and evaluate specific domains of practice. The paper concludes by recommending ethnomethodology as a way to dissolve an unbridgeable gap between cultural theories and socially located practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, J. and Giesen, B. (1987). From reduction to linkage: the long view of the micromacro link. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Münch and N. Smelser (Eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccus, M. (1986). Multipiece truck wheel accidents and their regulations. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological Studies of Work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjelic, D. (1995). An ethnomethodological clarification of Husserl's concepts of “regressive inquiry” and “Galilean physics” by means of discovering praxioms. Human Studies 18: 189-225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1981). The strengths of the strong programme in the sociology of knowledge. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11.

  • Burns, S. (1986). An ethnomethodological case study of law pedgagogy in civil procedure. Unpublished paper. Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Button, G. (Ed.). (1991). Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, G., and Sharrock, W. (1993). A disagreement over agreement and consensus in constructionist sociology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23: 1-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambrosio, A., and Keating, P. (1995). Exquisite Specificity: The Monoclonal Antibody Revolution. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.V. (1973). Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M. (1983). An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge. In K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1994). The moon is not a calabash. The Times Higher Education Supplement (30 September), p. 17.

  • Denzin, N. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism and ethnomethodology: A proposed synthesis. American Sociological Review 34.

  • Durkheim, E. (1865/1969). The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1865/1964). Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1960). Parsons' Primer: Ad Hoc Uses. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1996). Ethnomethodology's program. Social Psychology Quarterly 59(1): 5-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. and Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 131-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. and Wieder, D.L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson and R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, pp. 175-206. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1976). The New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, D. (1994). A World Without Words: The Social Construction of Children Born Deaf and Blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P. and Levitt, N. (1994). Higher Superstition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, W. (1982). Ethnomethodology: How People Make Sense. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1996). Standpoint epistemology (a feminist version): How social disadvantage creates epistemic advantage. In S. Turner (Ed.), Social Theory and Sociology: The Classics and Beyond. Oxford.

  • Hartsock, N. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding and M. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel/Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heap, J. and Roth, P. (1973). On phenomenological sociology. American Sociological Review, 39(2).

  • Heidegger, M. (1967). Being and Time. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, R. (1995). Garfinkel's recovery of themes in classical sociology. Human Studies 18: 157-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R.J. and Crittenden, K.S. (Eds.) (1968). Proceedings of the Purdue Symposium on Ethnomethodology. Purdue, IN: Institute for the Study of Social Change, Department of Sociology, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E.F. (1992). Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender and Science. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1981). The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the Love of Technology. (Catherine Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1981). The pseudo-science of science? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 173-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, K. (1986). Understanding Interaction in Central Australia: An Ethnomethodological Study of Australian Aboriginal People. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, E. (1986). The Ethnomethodological Foundations of Mathematics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1982). Technical work and critical inquiry: Investigations in a scientific laboratory. Social Studies of Science 12: 499-534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985). Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1996). Detoxifying the “poison pen” effect. In A. Ross (Ed.), Science Wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. (1994). Harvey Sacks's primitive natural science. Theory, Culture & Society 11(4): 65-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. and Clayman, S. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 385-418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A. (1981). Ethnomethodology and the Position of Relativist Discourse. Journal for the Theory of social Behaviour 11(2): 107-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, J. (1980). From Phenomenology to Ethnomethodology: Some Radical “Misreadings”. In S. McNall (Eds.), Current Perspectives in Social Theory Vol 1. Greenwich: JAI.

  • Pickering, A. (1984). Against putting the phenomena first: The discovery of the weak neutral current. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 15: 85-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T. (1985). Towards an analysis of scientific observation: the externality and evidential significance of observational reports in physics. Social Studies of Science 15: 3-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollner, M. (1991). 'Left' of ethnomethodology. American Sociological Review 56: 370- 380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment Responses: Notes on the Cooperation of Multiple Constraints. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A. (1996). Durkheim's epistemology. American Journal of Sociology.

  • Ross, A. (1996) (Ed.). Science Wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Eds.), Studies in Social Interaction, pp. 31-74. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson and J.C. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 21-27. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univesity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Two Volumes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1964). On multiple realities. In A. Schutz, (Ed.), Collected Papers II. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock, W. and Anderson, B. (1991). Epistemology: Professional scepticism. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, pp. 51-76. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1992). Sociology from women's experience: A reaffirmation. Sociological Theory 10: 88-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, A. (1996). Transgressing the boundaries: An afterward. Philosophy & Literature 20(2): 338-346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (1994). The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S. (1996). Sokal's hoax. New York Review of Books 8 August 1996: 11-15.

  • Wilson, T. ( 1971). Normative and Interpretive Paradigms in Sociology. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK

    Michael Lynch

Authors
  1. Michael Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynch, M. Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory. Human Studies 22, 211–233 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005440501638

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005440501638

Keywords

Search

Navigation