Skip to main content
Log in

Equivocation as a Point of Order

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Equivocation, or multiple meaning, is explained through the introduction of an additional response, the distinction, to points of order in formal dialogue objecting to immediate inconsistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle: 1968, ‹Sophistical Refutations’ (tr. W. A. Pickard-Cambridge), in W. D. Ross (ed.), The Works of Aristotle, volume 1, Oxford University Press, London. First printed 1928. References by chapter, and by the Bekker pagination

  • Barth E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.: 1985, The Prevalence of Humbug, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R.: 2002, Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll L. [C. Dodgson]: 1895, ‹What the Tortoise Said to Achilles’, Mind n.s. 4, 278–280

  • Diogenes Laertius: 1966/1925, Vitae, Lives of Eminent Philosophers (tr. R. D. Hicks), William Heinemann, London. First printed 1925. References by book and paragraph

  • Frankfurt, H. G.: 2005, On Bullshit, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G.: 1984, Logic and Reasoning, Synthèse 60, 107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1962/1927, Being and Time (tr. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson), Harper & Row, New York. First published in 1927

  • Kripke, S.: 1972, ‹Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 253–355

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edition), University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W.: 1981/1765, New Essays on Human Understanding (tr. P. Remnant and J. Bennett), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. First published in 1756. References by chapter and section, and by the pagination of the 1962 Akademie-Verlag of Berlin edition printed in the margins of the translation

  • Lewis, D. K.: 1982, Logic for Equivocators, Noûs 16, 431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J.: 1979, How to Stop Talking to Tortoises, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20, 705–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, J.: 1989, Reasoning and Logic, Synthèse 69, 99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1961/1948, ‹On What There Is’, in W. V. Quine (ed.), From a Logical Point of View, Harper, New York, pp. 1–19. First published in 1948

  • Quine, W. V.: 1966/1956, ‹Quantifiers and Attitudes’, in W. V. Quine (ed.), The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Random House, New York, pp. 183–194. First published in 1956

  • Russell, B.: 1969, Autobiography, George Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • van Laar, J. A.: 2003, The Dialectic of Ambiguity: A contribution to the Study of Argumentation (Dissertation), Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1963/1953, Philosophical Investigations (tr. G. E. M. Anscombe), Blackwell, Oxford. First published in 1953

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim Mackenzie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mackenzie, J. Equivocation as a Point of Order. Argumentation 21, 223–231 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9050-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9050-2

Keywords

Navigation