Abstract
This analysis scrutinises the rhetorical strategies used by judges in wrongful life and wrongful birth actions as evidence for the assertion that the judicial reading of public policy in such cases has undergone a significant shift which is likely to accelerate as genetic knowledge grows and health care resources shrink. The implications of the predicted move towards increased genetic testing of prospective parents are traversed in relation to feminist analyses of the impact of genetics on reproductive technology. These are viewed as forming a nexus with the current social constructions of disability and the contemporary cultural preoccupation with risk, in a context of the increasing commercial importance of genetic information. It is argued that women cannot make free and informed choices about genetic testing and pregnancy unless legal and social mechanisms which protect those choices are in place.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bender, L., “Changing the Values in Tort Law”, Tulsa Law Journal 25 (1990), 759-843.
Biggs, H. & Mackenzie, R., “Reproductive Tourism”, Progress in Reproduction 2 (1998), 9.
Conaghan, J. & Mansell, W., The Wrongs of Tort 2d. ed. (London: Pluto, 1999).
Corea, G., The Mother Machine (London: Women's Press, 1985).
Cunningham-Burley, S., “Understanding Disability”, Progress in Reproduction 2 (1998), 10–11.
Franklin, S., “Postmodern Procreation: a Cultural Account of Assisted Reproduction”, in Conceiving the New World Order: the Global Politics of Reproduction, eds. F.D. Ginsburg & R. Rapp (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).
Ginsburg, F.D. & Rapp, R. (eds.), Conceiving the New World Order: the Global Politics of Reproduction (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995).
Haraway, D., “The Biopolitics of Postmodern Bodies”, Differences 1 (1989), 3–43.
Jackson, A., “Action for Wrongful Life, Wrongful Pregnancy and Wrongful Birth in the United States and England”, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal 57 (1995), 535–634.
Jackson, A., “Wrongful Life and Wrongful Birth: the English Conception”, Journal of Legal Medicine 64 (1996), 349–374.
Kennedy, I. & Grubb, A., Medical Law (London: Butterworths, 1994).
Law Commission, Injuries to Unborn Children (London: HMSO, 1974) cmnd. 5709, Report No. 60.
Lee, R., “To Be or Not To Be: Is That the Question? The Claim of Wrongful Life”, in Birthright: Law and Ethics at the Beginning of Life, eds. R. Lee & D. Morgan (London: Routledge, 1989), 172–190.
Lee, R. & Morgan, D. (eds.), Birthright: Law and Ethics at the Beginning of Life (London: Routledge, 1989).
Lykke, N. & Braidotti, R. (eds.), Between Monsters, Goddesses and Cyborgs: Feminist Confrontations with Science, Medicine and Cyberspace (London: Zed Books, 1996), 207–236.
Mackenzie, R., “Lump Sums or Litigation? Compensation for Sexual Abuse: the Case for Reinstatement of a Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme”, New Zealand Universities Law Review 15 (1993), 367–395.
Malinowski, M., “Coming Into Being: Law, Ethics and the Practice of Prenatal Genetic Screening”, Hastings Law Journal 47 (1994), 1435–1484.
Mason, J.K., Medico-legal Aspects of Reproduction and Parenthood (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998).
Norrie, K. McK., “The Actionability of Birth” [1983], Scots Law Times, 121–126.
Norrie, K. McK., “Wrongful Life in Scots Law: No Right, No Remedy” [1990] Juridical Review 205–224.
Northern, K.S., “Procreative Torts: Enhancing the Common Law Protection for Reproductive Autonomy”, University of Illinois Law Review 84 (1998), 489–560.
Osber, J., “Gene Blues:Why You Should Think Twice About Betting Your Life on Genetic Testing”,http://www.salonmagazine.com/21st/feature/1998/04/cov_06feature.html, accessed 20.11.98.
Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury, Report(London: HMSO, 1978) CMND 7054-1.
Russell, E.J., “Is Parenthood an ‘Unblemished Blessing’ in Every Case?”, Scots Law Times 25 (1998), 191–197.
Spallone, P., “The Salutary Tale of the Pre-Embryo”, in Between Monsters, Goddesses and Cyborgs: Feminist Confrontations with Science, Medicine and Cyberspace, eds. N. Lykke & R. Braidotti, R. (London: Zed Books, 1996), 207–236.
Strasser, M., “Wrongful Life, Wrongful Birth, Wrongful Death, and the Right to Refuse Treatment: Can Reasonable Jurisdictions Recognise All But One?”, Missouri Law Review 64 (1999), 29–141.
Strasser, M., “Misconceptions andWrongful Births: a Call for a Principled Jurisprudence”, Arizona State Law Journal 87 (1999), 161–252.
Strathern, M., Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship and the New Reproductive Technologies (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992).
Tizzard, J., “Reproductive Technology: New Ethical Dilemmas and Old Moral Prejudices”, in Abortion Law and Politics Today, ed. E. Lee (London: Macmillan, 1998), 184–197.
Warnock, M., “Do Human Cells have Rights?” Bioethics 1 (1987), 1–13.
Warren, M., Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997).
West, R., “The Difference in Women's Hedonic Lives: a Phenomenological Critique of Feminist Legal Theory”, Wisconsin Women's Law Journal 3 (1987), 81–154.
Wilkie, T., Perilous Knowledge: the Human Genome Project and its Implications (London: Faber, 1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mackenzie, R. From Sancitity to Screening: Genetic Disabilities, Risk and Rhetorical Strategies in Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Conception Cases. Feminist Legal Studies 7, 175–191 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009235602773
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009235602773