Abstract.
Although the pages of Journal of Business Ethics have hosted an ongoing dialogue on the ethics of rhetoric and persuasion, the debates have been unable to account for the underlying morality of the human propensity to engage in rhetorical discourse as a part of living in society. In this paper, I offer natural-law ethical theory as a moral paradigm in which to examine rhetoric. In this context, I assert that rhetoric services reason, which in turn services our dispositions or inclinations that are one ideological foundation of natural-law theory. As rhetoric affects the apprehension of these dispositions it subsumes a related morality in which rhetorical endeavors can be seen as “natural”. So endowed, I believe that this conception of rhetoric offers a number of philosophical and practical implications, one of which is a new way to assess the morality of commercial manifestations of rhetoric such as spin and the use of puffery in advertising.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. Aquinas (1996) Treatise on Law (Summa Theologica Questions 90–97) Regnery Publishing Washington, DC
R. Arrington (1982) ArticleTitle‘Advertising and Behavior Control’ Journal of Business Ethics 1 3–12
B. Brummett (1976) ArticleTitle‘Some Implications of “Process” or “Intersubjectivity”: Postmodern Rhetoric’ Philosophy & Rhetoric 9 21–51
B. Brummett (1981) ArticleTitle‘ A Defens e of Ethical relativism as Rhetorically as Grounded’ The Western Journal of Speech Communication 45 286–298
B. Brummett (1982) ArticleTitle‘The Forum: On to Rhetorical Relativism’ Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 425–437
B. Brummett (1990) ArticleTitle‘The Forum: The Reported Demise of Epistemic Rhetoric’ Quarterly Journal of Speech 9 69–72
K. Burke (1950) A Rhetoric of Motives Prentice-Hall New York
G. Campbell (1963) The Philosophy of Rhetoric Southern Illinois University press Carbondale
R. Cherwitz (1995) ‘Rhetoric as “a Way of Knowing”: an Attenuation of the Epistemological Claims of the “ New Rhetoric ” W. Covina D. Jolliffe (Eds) Rhetoric: Concepts, Definitions, Boundaries Allyn and Bacon Needham Heights
R Crisp (1987) ArticleTitle‘Persuasive Advertising, Autonomy, and the Creation of Desire’ Journal of Business Ethics 6 413–418
M. Crowe (1977) The Changing Profile of the Natural Law Martinus Nijhoff The Hague
A. Cunningham (2003) ArticleTitle‘Autonomous Consumption: Buying Into the Ideology of Capitalism’ Journal of Business Ethics 48 229–236
J. Finnis (1998) Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory Oxford University Press Oxford
L. Fuller (1969) The Morality of Law Yale University Press New Haven
J. Golden E. Corbett (1968) The Rhetoric of Blair, Campbell, and Whately Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York
W. Harpine (2004) ArticleTitle‘What Do You Mean, Rhetoric Is Epistemic?’ Philosophy & Rhetoric 37 335–352
E. Hossein (1985) ArticleTitle‘The Informative and Persuasive Functions of Advertising: A Moral Appraisal – A Comment’ Journal of Business Ethics 4 1
H. Kainz (2004) Natural Law: A Reexamination Open Court Chicago
J. Kastely (1997) Rethinking the Rhetorical Tradition: From Plato to Postmodernism Yale University Press New Haven
L. Leslie (2004) Mass Communications Ethics Houghton Mifflin New York
A. Lisska (1996) Aquinas’s Theory of Natural Law Clarendon Press Oxford
J. Maciejewski (2003) ArticleTitle‘Can Natural Law Defend Advertising?’ Journal of Mass Media Ethics 18 111–122
Maciejewski J., Ozar D.: In Press, ‘How significant is the People’s Right to Know? Natural Law and the Right to Know in a Democracy’. Journal of Mass Media Ethics.
J. Maritain (1966) The Person and the Common Good University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame
R. McKeon (1987) ‘The Uses of Rhetoric in a Technological Age: Architectonic Productive Arts’ M. Bachman (Eds) Rhetoric: Essays in Invention and Discovery. Oxbow Press Woodbridge
C. Perelman L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame
C. Ryan (1965) ‘The Traditional Concept of Natural Law: An Interpretation’ I. Evans (Eds) Light on the Natural Law Compass Books London
R. Scott (1967) ArticleTitle‘On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic’ Central States Speech journal 18 9–16
R. Scott (1973) ArticleTitle‘On Not Defining ‘Rhetoric” Philosophy & Rhetoric 6 IssueID(2 81–96
R. Scott (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Forum: Between Silence and Certainty: A Codicil To ’Dialectical Tensions of Speaking and Silence’ Quarterly journal of Speech 86 108–110
K. Wallace (1943) Francis Bacon on Communication and Rhetoric University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill
K. Watson (1973) ArticleTitle‘A Rhetorical and Sociolinguistic Model for the Analysis of Narrative’ American.Anthropologist 75 243–264
A. Walzer (1995) ArticleTitle‘Rhetoric and Gender in Jane Austen’s Persuasion’ College English 57 688–707
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maciejewski, J.J. Reason as a Nexus of Natural Law and Rhetoric. J Bus Ethics 59, 247–257 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3437-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3437-5