Abstract
The paper proposes an outline of a reconciliatory approach to the perennial controversy between epistemological realism and anti-realism (constructionism). My main conceptual source in explaining this view is the philosophy of pragmatism, more specifically, the epistemological theories of George H. Mead, John Dewey, and also William James’ radical empiricism. First, the paper analyzes the pragmatic treatment of the goal-directedness of action, especially with regard to Mead’s notion of attitudes, and relates it to certain contemporary epistemological theories provided by the cognitive sciences (Maturana, Rizzolatti, Clark). Against this background, the paper presents a philosophical as well as empirical justification of why we should interpret the environment and its objects in terms of possibilities for action. In Mead’s view, the objects and events of our world emerge within stable patterns of organism-environment interactions, which he called “perspectives”. According to pragmatism as well as the aforementioned cognitive scientists, perception and other cognitive processes include not only neural processes in our heads but also the world itself. Elaborating on Mead’s concept of perspectives, the paper argues in favor of the epistemological position called “constructive realism.”
[1] Barrett, L. (2011). Beyond the Brain: How Body and Environment Shape Animal and Human Minds. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[2] Bogdan, R. (1994). Grounds for Cognition: How Goal-guided Behavior Shapes the Mind. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar
[3] Chemero, A. (2003). An Outline of a Theory of Affordances. Ecological Psychology 15(2), 181–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5Search in Google Scholar
[4] Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar
[5] Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind. Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[6] de Waal, C. (2002). On Mead. Belmont: Wadsworth. Search in Google Scholar
[7] Dewey, J. (1896). The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology. Psychological Review 3(1), 357–370. Available from: http://www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Dewey/Dewey_1896.html [Retrieved: 12/02/2012]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0070405Search in Google Scholar
[8] Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books. Search in Google Scholar
[9] Dewey, J. (1939). The Biography of John Dewey. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.). The Philosophy of John Dewey, pp. 3–45. New York: Tudor Publishing Co. Retrieved from: http://www.brocku.ca/MeadProject/Dewey/Dewey_1939.html [03/10/2012]. Search in Google Scholar
[10] Fodor, J. (1980). Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3(1), 63–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00001771Search in Google Scholar
[11] Fodor, J. (2008). LOT2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[12] Franks, D. (2010). Neurosociology: The Nexus Between Neuroscience and Social Psychology. New York: Springer. Search in Google Scholar
[13] Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Search in Google Scholar
[14] Hutto, D. D. (2011). Enactivism: Why be Radical? In H. Bredekamp, J. M. Krois (Eds.). Sehen und Handeln, pp. 21–44. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/9783050062389.21Search in Google Scholar
[15] Hutto, D. D., Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing Enactivism. Basic Minds without Content. Cambridge: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar
[16] Iacoboni, M. (2008). Mirroring People. The Science of Empathy and How We Connect with Others. New York: Picador. Search in Google Scholar
[17] James, W. (1922). Does Consciousness Exist? In Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York: Longmans, Green and Co. Search in Google Scholar
[18] Johnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the Body. Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago London: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
[19] Kilpinen, E. (2008). Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Action. Paper presented at the First Nordic Pragmatism Conference, Helsinki, Finland, June 2008. Search in Google Scholar
[20] Kilpinen, E. (2013). George H. Mead as an Empirically Responsible Philosopher. In K. Skowroński, T. Burke (Eds.). George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, pp. 3–20. Lanham: Lexington Books. Search in Google Scholar
[21] Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar
[22] Margolis, J. (1995). Historied Thought, Constructed World. A Conceptual Primer for the Turn of the Millenium. Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar
[23] Margolis, J. (2001). Selves and Other Texts: The Case for Cultural Realism. University Park: Pennsylvannia State University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[24] Maturana, H. R. (1970/1980). Biology of Cognition. In H. R. Maturana, F. J. Varela. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, pp. 5–58. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 42. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4_1Search in Google Scholar
[25] Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J. (1998). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, revised edition. Boston: Shambhala Press. Search in Google Scholar
[26] McGann, M. (2010). Perceptual Modalities: Modes of Presentation or Modes of Interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies 17, 72–94. Search in Google Scholar
[27] Mead, G. H. (1926/1964). The Nature of Aesthetic Experience. In A. J. Reck (Ed.). Selected Writings: George Herbert Mead, pp. 294–305. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar
[28] Mead, G. H. (1927/1982). 1927 Lectures in Social Psychology. In D. L. Miller (Ed.). The Individual and the Social Self: Unpublished Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar
[29] Mead, G. H. (1927/1964). The Objective Reality of Perspectives. In A. J. Reck (Ed.). Selected Writings: George Herbert Mead, pp. 306–319. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar
[30] Mead, G. H. (1929/1964). A Pragmatic Theory of Truth. In A. J. Reck (Ed.). Selected Writings: George Herbert Mead, pp. 320–344. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar
[31] Mead, G. H. (1932). Philosophy of the Present. La Salle: Open Court. Search in Google Scholar
[32] Mead, G. H. (1934/1967). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar
[33] Mead, G. H. (1938). Philosophy of the Act. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[34] Mead, G. H. (n.d./2011). On the Self and Teleological Behavior. In F. C. da Silva (Ed.). G. H. Mead: A Reader, pp. 21–44. New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
[35] Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar
[36] Noë, A. (2013). On Overintellectualizing the Intellect. In J. K. Schear (Ed.). Mind, Reason, and Beingin-the-world: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, pp. 178–193. London and New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
[37] Rizzolatti, G., Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions, Emotions, and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[38] Rochat, P. (2009). Others in Mind. Social Origins of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812484Search in Google Scholar
[39] Rockwell, W. T. (2005). Neither Brain Nor Ghost. A Non-dualist Alternative to the Mind-Brain Identity Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar
[40] Rowlands, M. (2003). Externalism. Putting Mind and World Back Together Again. Montreal — Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Search in Google Scholar
[41] Ryder, J. (2013). Mead on Nature: The Relationality of Perspectives. In K. Skowroński, T. Burke (Eds.). George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-first Century, pp. 51–60. Lanham: Lexington Books. Search in Google Scholar
[42] Thompson, E. (2004). Life and Mind: From Autopoiesis to Neurophenomenology. A Tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3, 381–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048936.73339.ddSearch in Google Scholar
© 2013 Institute for Research in Social Communication, Slovak Academy of Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
