Skip to main content
Log in

Morphodynamical Abduction. Causation by Attractors Dynamics of Explanatory Hypotheses in Science

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Philosophers of science today by and large reject the cataclysmic and irrational interpretation of the scientific enterprise claimed by Kuhn. Many computational models have been implemented to rationally study the conceptual change in science. In this recent tradition a key role is played by the concept of abduction as a mechanism by which new explanatory hypotheses are introduced. Nevertheless some problems in describing the most interesting abductive issues rise from the classical computational approach. It describes a cognitive process (and so abduction) by the manipulation of internal symbolic representations of external world. This view assumes a discrete set of representations fixed in discrete time jumps, and cannot adequately account for the issue of anticipation and causation of a new hypothesis. An integration of the traditional computational view with some ideas developed inside the so-called dynamical approach can suggest some important insights. The concept of attractor is very significant. It permits a description of the abductive generation of new hypotheses in terms of a catastrophic rearrangement of the parameters responsible for the behavior of the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbaras, R.: 1999, The Movement of the Living as the Originary Foundation of Perceptual Intentionality. In J. Petitot, F.J. Varela, B. Pachoud and J.-M. Roy (eds.), 525–538.

  • C. Boutilier V. Becher (1995) ArticleTitleAbduction as Belief Revision Artificial Intelligence 77 43–94 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(94)00025-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Bylander D. Allemang M.C Tanner J.R. Josephson (1991) ArticleTitleThe Computational Complexity of Abduction Artificial Intelligence 49 25–60 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(91)90005-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.A. Fodor Z. Pylyshyn (1988) ArticleTitleConnectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis Cognition 28 3–71 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N.: 1999, Using Models to Represent Reality. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard (eds.), 41–57.

  • M.W. Hirsch (1984) ArticleTitleThe Dynamical Systems Approach to Differential Equations Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 11 1–64 Occurrence Handle10.1090/S0273-0979-1984-15236-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl (1931) Ideas. General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (1st Book, 1913), W.R. Boyce Gibson (trans.) Humanities Press George Allen & Unwin and New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  • P.N. Johnson-Laird (1983) Mental Models Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • T.S. Kuhn (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Magnani (2001) Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. and R. Dossena: 2002, Perceiving the Infinite and the Infinitesimal World in Mathematics: Unveiling and Optical Diagrams, Foundations of Science, this issue.

  • L. Magnani N.J. Nersessian (Eds) (2002) Model-Based Reasoning: Sciences, Technology, Values Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Magnani N.J. Nersessian P.. Thagard (Eds) (1999) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill J.S. (1843). A System of Logic. Reprinted in: The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J.M. Robson (ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • N.J. Nersessian (1995) ArticleTitleShould Physicists Preach What They Practice? Constructive Modeling in Doing and Learning Physics Science and Education 4 203–226 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00486621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J.: 1999,Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change,L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard, (eds.), 5–22.

  • Pachoud, B.: 1999, The Teleological Dimension of Perceptual and Motor Intentionality. In J. Petitot, F.J. Varela, B. Pachoud and J.-M. Roy (eds.), 196–219.

  • C.S. Peirce (1955) Abduction and Induction J. Buchler (Eds) Philosophical Writings of Peirce Dover New York 150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S.: 1931–1935, 1958, Collected Papers, vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.); vols. 7–8, A. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Petit, J.-L.: 1999, Constitution by Movement: Husserl in the Light of Rrecent Neurobiological Findings. In J. Petitot, F.J. Varela, B. Pachoud and J.-M. Roy, (eds.), 220–244.

  • J. Petitot F. Varela B. Pachoud J.M. Roy (Eds) (1999) Naturalizing Phenomenology Stanford University Press Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • R.F. Port T.. Van Gelder (Eds) (1995) Mind as Motion. Exploration in the Dynamics of Cognition The MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Thagard (1992) Conceptual Revolutions Princeton University Press Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R.: 1980, Modèles Mathèmatiques de la Morphogenèse. Paris: Christian Bourgois (English translation by W.M. Brookes and D. Rand, Mathematical Models of Morphogenesis. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Magnani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnani, L., Piazza, M. Morphodynamical Abduction. Causation by Attractors Dynamics of Explanatory Hypotheses in Science. Found Sci 10, 107–132 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3008-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3008-3

Keywords

Navigation