Abstract
Philosophers of science today by and large reject the cataclysmic and irrational interpretation of the scientific enterprise claimed by Kuhn. Many computational models have been implemented to rationally study the conceptual change in science. In this recent tradition a key role is played by the concept of abduction as a mechanism by which new explanatory hypotheses are introduced. Nevertheless some problems in describing the most interesting abductive issues rise from the classical computational approach. It describes a cognitive process (and so abduction) by the manipulation of internal symbolic representations of external world. This view assumes a discrete set of representations fixed in discrete time jumps, and cannot adequately account for the issue of anticipation and causation of a new hypothesis. An integration of the traditional computational view with some ideas developed inside the so-called dynamical approach can suggest some important insights. The concept of attractor is very significant. It permits a description of the abductive generation of new hypotheses in terms of a catastrophic rearrangement of the parameters responsible for the behavior of the system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbaras, R.: 1999, The Movement of the Living as the Originary Foundation of Perceptual Intentionality. In J. Petitot, F.J. Varela, B. Pachoud and J.-M. Roy (eds.), 525–538.
C. Boutilier V. Becher (1995) ArticleTitleAbduction as Belief Revision Artificial Intelligence 77 43–94 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(94)00025-V
T. Bylander D. Allemang M.C Tanner J.R. Josephson (1991) ArticleTitleThe Computational Complexity of Abduction Artificial Intelligence 49 25–60 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(91)90005-5
J.A. Fodor Z. Pylyshyn (1988) ArticleTitleConnectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis Cognition 28 3–71 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5
Giere, R.N.: 1999, Using Models to Represent Reality. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian, and P. Thagard (eds.), 41–57.
M.W. Hirsch (1984) ArticleTitleThe Dynamical Systems Approach to Differential Equations Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 11 1–64 Occurrence Handle10.1090/S0273-0979-1984-15236-4
E. Husserl (1931) Ideas. General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (1st Book, 1913), W.R. Boyce Gibson (trans.) Humanities Press George Allen & Unwin and New York, London
P.N. Johnson-Laird (1983) Mental Models Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
T.S. Kuhn (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions University of Chicago Press Chicago
L. Magnani (2001) Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York
Magnani, L. and R. Dossena: 2002, Perceiving the Infinite and the Infinitesimal World in Mathematics: Unveiling and Optical Diagrams, Foundations of Science, this issue.
L. Magnani N.J. Nersessian (Eds) (2002) Model-Based Reasoning: Sciences, Technology, Values Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York
L. Magnani N.J. Nersessian P.. Thagard (Eds) (1999) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers New York
Mill J.S. (1843). A System of Logic. Reprinted in: The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J.M. Robson (ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
N.J. Nersessian (1995) ArticleTitleShould Physicists Preach What They Practice? Constructive Modeling in Doing and Learning Physics Science and Education 4 203–226 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00486621
Nersessian, N.J.: 1999,Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change,L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard, (eds.), 5–22.
Pachoud, B.: 1999, The Teleological Dimension of Perceptual and Motor Intentionality. In J. Petitot, F.J. Varela, B. Pachoud and J.-M. Roy (eds.), 196–219.
C.S. Peirce (1955) Abduction and Induction J. Buchler (Eds) Philosophical Writings of Peirce Dover New York 150–156
Peirce, C.S.: 1931–1935, 1958, Collected Papers, vols. 1–6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.); vols. 7–8, A. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Petit, J.-L.: 1999, Constitution by Movement: Husserl in the Light of Rrecent Neurobiological Findings. In J. Petitot, F.J. Varela, B. Pachoud and J.-M. Roy, (eds.), 220–244.
J. Petitot F. Varela B. Pachoud J.M. Roy (Eds) (1999) Naturalizing Phenomenology Stanford University Press Stanford, CA
R.F. Port T.. Van Gelder (Eds) (1995) Mind as Motion. Exploration in the Dynamics of Cognition The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
P. Thagard (1992) Conceptual Revolutions Princeton University Press Princeton NJ
Thom, R.: 1980, Modèles Mathèmatiques de la Morphogenèse. Paris: Christian Bourgois (English translation by W.M. Brookes and D. Rand, Mathematical Models of Morphogenesis. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magnani, L., Piazza, M. Morphodynamical Abduction. Causation by Attractors Dynamics of Explanatory Hypotheses in Science. Found Sci 10, 107–132 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3008-3
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-005-3008-3