Skip to main content
Log in

Semiotic Brains Build Cognitive Niches

Biosemiotics of the Disembodiment of the Mind

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking advantage of Denis Noble’s description, in “The Illusions of the Modern Synthesis” of the first illusion, related to the concept of natural selection itself, I will further strengthen the criticism by adding three groups of considerations mainly concerning human cognition: 1) how semiotic brains build cognitive niches; 2) the role of abduction – and in particular of manipulative abduction – in building a semiotic artificial world; 3) the biosemiotics of the so-called disembodiment of the mind. Human semiotic brains are engaged in a continuous process of delegation and distribution of cognitive functions to the environment to lessen cognitive limitations, also and especially taking advantage of what I have called “manipulative abduction”. These design semiotic activities are closely related to the process of cognitive niche construction, which should be regarded as the second major participant, after natural selection, in evolution. An important effect of this semiotic brain activity is a continuous process of disembodiment of the mind that exhibits a new cognitive perspective on the mechanisms underlying the semiotic emergence of meaning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. I have to note that in this commentary the word “extragenetic” does not include epigenetic elements.

  2. I have illustrated the dynamics of these cognitive and semiotic mediators in science in Magnani (2009) and in moral and violent behavior in Magnani (2007c) and Magnani (2011).

  3. In my studies I always stressed the role played by abductive reasoning in human and non-human animal cognition (Magnani 2001, 2009, 2017). Conjectures can be either the result of an abductive selection in a set of pre-stored hypotheses (selective abduction, for example in medical diagnosis) or the creation of new ones (creative abduction) such as in the case of scientific discovery.

  4. Cf. Laland and Brown (2006).

  5. I have fully analyzed this issue in (Magnani 2007c).

  6. Cf. Zhang (1997); Hutchins (1995); Clark and Chalmers (1998); Wilson (2004); Magnani (2006); Magnani (2007a).

  7. On this interplay and the role of external representations as material anchors in the light of the so-called conceptual blends see the classical (Hutchins 2005).

  8. A detailed description of the example regarding the building of the carving of a supernatural being is illustrated in Magnani (2009).

  9. On this issue cf. (Magnani 2018).

References

  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, S., & Jablonka, E. (2019). The evolution of the sensitive soul. Learning and the origins of consciousness. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2006). Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 15, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin R (1982) Organism and environment. In: Plotkin H (ed) Learning, development and culture, Wiley, New York, NY, pp. 151–170.

  • Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science. Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2006). Mimetic minds. Meaning formation through epistemic mediators and external representations. In A. Loula, R. Gudwin, & J. Queiroz (Eds.), Artificial cognition systems (pp. 327–357). Hershey: Idea Group Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2007a). Animal abduction. From mindless organisms to artifactual mediators. In L. Magnani & P. Li (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in science, technology, and medicine (pp. 3–37). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2007b). Semiotic brains and artificial minds. How brains make up material cognitive systems. In R. Gudwin & J. Queiroz (Eds.), Semiotics and intelligent systems development (pp. 1–41). Hershey: Idea Group Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2007c). Morality in a technological world. Knowledge as duty: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2009). Abductive cognition. The epistemological and eco-cognitive dimensions of hypothetical reasoning. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani L (2011) Understanding violence. The intertwining of morality, religion, and violence: A philosophical stance. Springer, Heidelberg/Berlin.

  • Magnani, L. (2017). The abductive structure of scientific creativity. An essay on the ecology of cognition. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani L (2018) Eco-cognitive computationalism: From mimetic minds to morphology-based enhancement of mimetic bodies. Entropy 20(6).

  • Mithen S (1999) Handaxes and ice age carvings: Hard evidence for the evolution of consciousness. In: Hameroff AR, Kaszniak AW, Chalmers DJ (eds) Toward a science of consciousness III. The third Tucson discussions and debates, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 281–296.

  • Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction. The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, W. (2017). On Lorenzo Magnani’s manipulative abduction. In L. Magnani & T. Bertolotti (Eds.), Handbook of model-based science (pp. 197–213). Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. Norton, New York: W. W.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (2003) Language as an adaptation to the cognitive niche. In: Christiansen MH, Kirby S (eds) Language evolution, Oxford University press, Oxford, pp 16–37.

  • Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), Primate models of hominid behavior (pp. 183–237). Albany: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing AM (1969) Intelligent machinery [1948]. In: Machine Intelligence, vol 5, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 3–23., edited by B. Meltzer and D. Michie.

  • Turner, J. S. (2004). Extended phenotypes and extended organisms. Biology and Philosophy, 19, 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Magnani.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magnani, L. Semiotic Brains Build Cognitive Niches. Biosemiotics 14, 41–48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09416-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09416-0

Keywords

Navigation