Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Liberalism and the moral basis for human rights

  • Published:
Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman Bruce (1991) We the People: Foundations Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexy Robert (2004) The Nature of Legal Philosophy. Ratio Juris 17(2):156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan Allen (2004) Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink David (1989) Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen Joshua (1998) The Arc of the Moral Universe. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26(2):91–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby Derrick (2003) Grounding Rights in Social Practices: A Defense. Res Publica 9:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall Stephen (2006) Contractualism, Root and Branch: A Review Essay. Philosophy and Public Affairs 34(2):193–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald, ‹Taking Rights Seriously’, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977), pp. 184–205.

  • Dworkin, Ronald, ‹Policy, Principle, Procedure’, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985), pp. 72–103.

  • Dworkin Ronald (1986) Law’s Empire Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estlund David (1998) On the Insularity of the Reasonable: Why Political Liberalism Must Admit the Truth. Ethics 108: 252–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendon Mary Ann (2001) A World Made New Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Trans. C.L. Lenhardt and S.W. Nicholsen, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990).

  • Habermas, Jurgen, Between Facts and Norms (Trans. W. Rehg, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).

  • Habermas, Jurgen, ‹Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace: At Two Hundred Years Historical Remove’, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998a), pp. 165–201.

  • Habermas, Jurgen, ‹Remarks on Legitimation Through Human Rights’, The Postnational Constellation (Trans. M Pensky, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001), pp. 113–139.

  • Habermas, Jurgen, ‹Rightness versus Truth: On the Sense of Normative Validity in Moral Judgments and Norms’, Truth and Justification (Trans. B. Fultner, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), pp. 237–275.

  • Hampton Jean (1989) Should Political Philosophy Be Done Without Metaphysics? Ethics 99: 791–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A., ‹Between Utility and Rights’, Essays on Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1983a). pp. 198–222.

  • Hart, H.L.A., ‹Utilitarianism and Natural Rights’, Essays on Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1983b), pp. 181–197.

  • Heath Joseph (2001) Communicative Action and Rational Choice MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, David, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Global Governance (Stanford University Press, 1995).

  • Hobbes Thomas (1651/1994) Leviathan Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, Michael, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Ed. A. Gutmann, Princeton, 2001).

  • Lafont Cristina (2004) Moral Objectivity and Reasonable Agreement: Can Realism be Reconciled with Kantian Constructivism? Ratio Juris 17(1): 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larmore Charles (1999) The Moral Basis of Liberalism. Journal of Philosophy XCVI(12): 599–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, Jon, ‹Rights without Dignity? Some Critical Reflections on Habermas’ Procedural Model of Law and Democracy’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 27(3) (2001): 21–40

  • Mahoney, Jon, ‹Objectivity, Interpretation and Rights: A Critique of Dworkin’, Law and Philosophy 23(2) (March 2004a): 187–222

  • Mahoney, Jon, ‹Public Reason and the Moral Foundation of Liberalism’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 1(3) (2004b): 311–331

  • McMahon Christopher (2002) Why There is no Issue between Rawls and Habermas. Journal of Philosophy XCIL(3): 111–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milo Ronald (1995) Contractarian Constructivism. The Journal of Philosophy XCVII(4): 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum Martha (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge Thomas (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights Polity Press, Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls John (1971/1999a) A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls John (1996) Political Liberalism Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls John (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John, ‹The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999b), pp. 131–180.

  • Rorty, Richard, ‹Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality’, Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 167–185.

  • Sayre-McCord, Geoffry, ‹Contemporary Contractarian Moral Theory’, in Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory (Blackwell, 1999), pp. 247–267.

  • Scanlon Thomas (1998) What We Owe to Each Other Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer Brian (2005) Human Rights: Problems with the Foundationless Approach. Social Theory and Practice 31:27–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen Amartya (2004) Elements of a Theory of Human Rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32(4):315–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Kok-Chor (2004) Justice Without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace R. Jay (2002) Scanlon’s Contractualism. Ethics 112(3): 429–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank John Exdell and Amy Lara for very helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the paper. I also thank two reviewers for this Journal for a number of very good suggestions. Thanks also to participants at the 2005 NEH Summer Seminar on “Political Obligation, Democratic Legitimacy and Human Rights” at Georgia State University. This paper is greatly imporved as a result of constructive suggestions from participants in the Seminar. Finally, I thank the audience at the Universidad Di Tella in Buenos Aires for a number of comments on a presentation given in September 2006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Kansas State University, 201 Dickens Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506-0803, USA

    Jon Mahoney

Authors
  1. Jon Mahoney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Mahoney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahoney, J. Liberalism and the moral basis for human rights. Law and Philos 27, 151–191 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-007-9013-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-007-9013-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation