Abstract
The present experiment investigated the hypothesis that encoding for recall involves organization of input stimuli, while recognition entails encoding to achieve discriminability of individual items. Subjects were given either recall or recognition instructions, one or three presentations of a list of nouns, and did or did not perform an auxiliary task of repeating the words aloud at input. All subjects received recall and recognition tests. The results showed higher recall with recall instructions in the no-task condition. Oral repetition produced a decrement in recall following recall instructions, but had no effect with recognition instructions. Also, the auxiliary task had no effect on recall with recognition instructions, but with recognition instructions recognition performance was increased to the level of recall subjects. The results are discussed in terms of current models of recall and recognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References Note
Miller. M. E., Maisto, S. A.. & Rosinsky, R. W. The effect of instructions on recall and recognition performance. Manuscript in preparation.
References
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 97–123.
Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. A propositional theory of recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 1974, 2, 406–412.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 671–684.
Fischler, I., Rundus, D., & Atkinson, R. C. Effects of overt rehearsal procedures on free recall. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19, 249–250.
Frost, N. Encoding and retrieval in visual memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 95, 317–326.
Kintsch, W. Models for free recall and recognition. In D. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Klatzky, R. L. Human memory: Structures and processes. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.
Light, L. L., & Carter-Sobell, L. Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 1–11.
Loftus, G. Comparison of recognition and recall in a continuous memory task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 91, 220–226.
Schwartz, R. M., & Humphreys, M. S. Recognition and recall as a function of instructional manipulations of organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 102, 517–519.
Tulving, E. Subjective organization in free recall of ‘unrelated’ words. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 344–354.
Tulving, E. Subjective organization and effects of repetition in multitrial free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 193–198.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 352–373.
Tversky, B. Encoding processes in recognition and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 5, 275–287.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is sponsored by F. I. M. Craik, who takes full editorial responsibility for its content.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maisto, S.A., Dewaard, R.J. & Miller, M.E. Encoding processes for recall and recognition: The effect of instructions and auxiliary task performance. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 9, 127–130 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336951
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336951