Abstract
This chapter evaluates the impact eldercare robots could have on human dignity. It specifically seeks to answer the question: under which conditions would the application of robots in eldercare undermine human dignity? This question is motivated by the recent disparity between the number of older persons in need of care and the number of care providers able to give care. While the number of older persons needing care has steadily risen, there has been a shortage of healthcare providers. In addition, negligence and ill-treatment of older persons in care facilities have been reported. These issues have increased the interest and development of care robots. Debates regarding whether it is ethical to enable certain aspects of care for older persons to be relegated to robots have since emanated. One of the chief arguments is that using robots in eldercare would undermine the dignity of older persons. The chapter responds to the proposed question by outlining the approaches to dignity that are salient in the discourse. It then introduces the Afro-communitarian conception of dignity as another plausible approach to evaluate such impact, especially in communitarian societies. It argues that robot-assisted care does not pose much risk in a communitarian setting, while robot-based care is unlikely. This point will be highlighted by evaluating existing and espoused robot technologies within the care paradigm. It concludes that there are more instances where using such robots would benefit the dignity of both the older persons and the community. Thus, conducting such evaluations helps mitigate the risks before such systems are implemented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arkin, R. C., Ulam, P., & Wagner, A. R. (2012). Moral decision making in autonomous systems: Enforcement, moral emotions, dignity, trust, and deception. In Proceedings of the IEEE (Vol. 100, pp. 571–589). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2011.2173265
Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). “How I learned to love the robot”: Capabilities, information technologies, and elderly care. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, 5, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3879-9_5
Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Care robots and the future of ICT-mediated elderly care: A response to doom scenarios. AI & Society, 31(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0626-3
Decker, M. (2008). Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: The perspective of interdisciplinary technology assessment. AI & Society, 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0151-0
Girling, R. (2021). Can care robots improve the quality of life as we age? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robgirling/2021/01/18/can-care-robots-improve-quality-of-life-as-we-age/?sh=79596e6a668b. Accessed 28 Jan 2022.
Gyekye, K. (2002). Person and community in African thought. In P. Coetzee & A. Roux (Eds.), Philosophy from Africa: A text with readings (pp. 297–312). Oxford University Press.
Ikuenobe, P. A. (2016). The communal basis for moral dignity: An African perspective. Philosophical Papers, 45(3), 437–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2016.1245833
Laitinen, A., Niemelä, M., & Pirhonen, J. (2019). Demands of dignity in robotic care: Recognising vulnerability, agency, and subjectivity in robot-based, robot-assisted, and teleoperated elderly care. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 23(3), 366–401. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20191127108
Matolino, B. (2009). Radicals versus moderates: A critique of Gyekye’s moderate communitarianism. South African Journal of Philosophy, 28(2), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajpem.v28i2.46674
Menkiti, I. A. (1984). Person and community in African traditional thought. In African philosophy: An introduction (pp. 171–182).
Metz, T. (2012). African conceptions of human dignity: Vitality and community as the ground of human rights. Human Rights Review, 13(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-011-0200-4
Metz, T. (2014). Dignity in the Ubuntu tradition. In The Cambridge handbook of human dignity (pp. 310–318). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511979033.037
Metz, T. (2021). A relational moral theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198748960.001.0001
Molefe, M. (2019). An African philosophy of personhood, morality, and politics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15561-2
Molefe, M. (2022). Human dignity in African philosophy. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93217-6
Nussbaum, M. (2008). Human dignity and political entitlements. In Human dignity and bioethics: Essays commissioned by the President’s council on bioethics (pp. 351–380).
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Belknap Press: Harvard University. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200. Accessed 5 June 2023.
Sharkey, A. (2014). Robots and human dignity: A consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9338-5
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6
Sparrow, R. (2016). Robots in aged care: A dystopian future? AI & Society, 31(4), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0625-4
Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-006-9030-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Maiyane, K. (2023). Robots and Dignity: An Afro-communitarian Argument in Eldercare. In: Imafidon, E., Tshivhase, M., Freter, B. (eds) Handbook of African Philosophy. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25149-8_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25149-8_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25148-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25149-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities