Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transformative power of technologies: cultural transfer and globalization

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last three decades, a cultural perspective has been used to understand scientific knowledge and technology. This relatively new perspective has introduced literature on the ethical dimension to the development of technology, which are embedded in techniques, tools and artifacts. Today, more than ever, there is an urgent need to comprehend the global ramifications of modernization. In this paper, we make an attempt to look at science and technology based on culture, wisdom, ecology and ethical values. We move towards reviewing and consolidating significant literature on philosophy of technology and culture within contemporary times. Furthermore, this article touches upon the transformative power of technologies in relation to modernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As can be seen, in each set of human-technology relations, the model is that of an inter-relational ontology. This style of ontology carries with it a number of implications, including ones which imply that there is a co-constitution of, for example, humans and their technologies (Ihde 2009: 44). Technologies transform our experience of the world and our perceptions and interpretations of our world, and we, in turn, become transformed in this process. Transformations are non-neutral. And it is here that histories and any empirical turn becomes effectively ontologically important. This, in turn, returns us to the pragmatist insight that histories are also important in any philosophical analysis as such (Ihde 2009: 44). Postphenomenology continues the phenomenological tradition of relationalistic ontology. In the case of technologies, for example, humans may “invent” technologies, but in use, all technologies also “re-invent” humans. Co-constitution is recognized in a relational ontology. But, such relational ontologies are not unique to phenomenology—they are part of the family of pragmatic [organism/environment] and actor network [humans and non-humans] ontologies as well. Variational analyses provide the methodological style of this approach. With technologies, there are multiple ways in which any single technology may be related to users and multiple ways in which each technology is culturally embedded.

References

  • Borgmann A (2006) Technology as a cultural force. Can J Sociol Cahiers Can Sociol 31(2):351–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann A (2012a) The collision of plausibility with reality: lifting the veil of the ethical neutrality of technology. Educ Technol 52:40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann A (2012b) Matter matters: materiality in philosophy, physics, and technology materiality and organizing. In: Nardi BA, Kalinikos J (eds) Leonardi PM. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 335–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Brackert H, Wefelmeyer F (1984) Naturplan und Verfallskritik. Zu Begriff und Geschichte der Kultur, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Brey P (2000) Theories of technology as extension of human faculties. In: Mitcham C (ed) Metaphysics, epistemology, and technology (research in philosophy and technology), vol 19. JAI, Amsterdam, pp 59–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay S, Simon A (2008) East meets West: cross-cultural perspective in end-of-life decision making from Indian and German viewpoints. Med Health Care Philos 11:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9106-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen E (1994) (Hg) Technology transfer to developing countries. London, New York

  • Coeckelbergh M (2015) The art of living with ICTs: the ethics–aesthetics of vulnerability coping and its implications for understanding and evaluating ICT cultures. Found Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-015-9436-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coeckelbergh M (2016) Technology and the good society: a polemical essay on social ontology, political principles, and responsibility for technology. Technol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.12.002 (Forthcoming)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries MJ (2005) Teaching about technology: an introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill KS (1996) The human-centred movement: the British context. AI Soc 10:109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill SP (1999) Mediation and communication of information in the cultural interface. AI Soc 13:218–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill KS (2012) Human machine symbiotics: on control and automation in human contexts. In: IFAC international stability and systems engineering (SWIIS) conference, Waterford

  • Gill KS (2015) Beyond systems: in search of poietic thinking. AI Soc 30:139–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0576-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1988) Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne, Frankfurt

  • Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology. In: The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Harper, New York, pp 3–35 (Original work published 1954)

  • Huang K, Deng Y (2008) Social interaction design in cultural context: a case study of a traditional social activity. Int J Design [Online] 2:2. Available: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/341/168

  • Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to Earth. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde D (1993) Technology as cultural instrument. Postphenomenology: essays in the postmodern context. Northwestern University Press, Northwestern, pp 32–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde D (2009) Postphenomenology and technoscience: the Peking University lectures. SUNY Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Irrgang B (2006) Technologietransfer transkulturell. Komparative Hermeneutik von Technik in Europa, Indien und China [Transcultural Technology Transfer: Comparative Hermeneutics of Technology in Europe, India and China]. Dresden Philosophy of Technology Studies 1; Frankfurt u.a.

  • Irrgang B (2007) Hermeneutische Ethik: Pragmatisch-ethische Orientierung in technologischen Gesellschaften [Hermeneutical Ethics. Pragmatic-ethics Orientation in technological societies]. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

  • Irrgang B (2008) Philosophie der technik [Philosophy of technology]. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Irrgang B (2014) Handling technical power: philosophy of technology (G. Somasekharan, trans.). Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart

  • MacKenzie D, Wajcman J (eds) (1999) The social shaping of technology. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski B (1935) Coral gardens and their magic. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone MS (1995) The microprocessor: a biography (Silicon Valley Series). Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn W (1969) Kultur und sozialer Wandel. Ausgewählte Schriften; ed. von O. D. Duncan, Neuwied, Berlin

  • Pfaffenberger B (1992) Social anthropology of technology. Ann Rev Anthropol 21:491–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato K, Chen K (2008) Special issue editorial: cultural aspects of interaction design. Int J Design [Online] 2:2. Available: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/459/161

  • Schumacher EF (1973) Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Selinger E (2007) Technology transfer: what can philosophers contribute? Philos Public Policy Q 27(1/2):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Selinger E (2009) Towards a reflexive framework for development: technology transfer after the empirical turn. Synthese 1(68):377–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9450-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields MA (1997) Reinventing technology in social theory. Curr Perspect Soc Theory 17:187–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi AK (2017) Hermeneutics of technological culture. AI Soc 32:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0717-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi MY (2017) Technology for the most efective use of mankind. Commun ACM 60(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner L (1980) Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, vol 109. The MIT Press, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Cambridge, pp 121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner L (1989) Techne and Politeia. The whale and the reactor. A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 40–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner L (1990) Engineering ethics and political imagination. In: Durbin P (ed) Broad and narrow interpretations of philosophy of technology, philosophy and technology, vol 7. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norword, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mrinmoy Majumder.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majumder, M., Tripathi, A.K. Transformative power of technologies: cultural transfer and globalization. AI & Soc 38, 2295–2303 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01144-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01144-w

Keywords

Navigation