Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of Mead's “self” and Heidegger's “Dasein”: Toward a regrounding of social psychology

  • Articles
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Baumann, Z. (1978). Hermeneutics and social science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bove, P.A. (1980). Destructive poetics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, M.J., and Burger, J.S. (1978). George Herbert Mead and social reform: His work and writings. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 14: 362–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, E.R. (1973). Mead's concept of time. In W.R. Corti (Ed.), The philosophy of George Herbert Mead. Winterthur, Switzerland: Amriswiler Buckerei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D.D. (1984). Notes on Mead's image of emotions. Paper presented at the Midwest Sociological Association Annual Meetings, Chicago, Illinois.

  • Fraser, N. (1981). Foucault's body language: A post humanist political rhetoric? Paper presented at the Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, Evanston, Illinois.

  • Goffman, E. (1956). The Presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Fhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Trans. K. MacQuarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, thought. Trans. A. Hofstadter. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. Trans. W. Lovitt. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1982). The basic problems of phenomenology. Trans. A. Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1983), The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holenstein, E. (1976). Roman Jakobson's approach to language. Trans. Schelbert and Schelbert, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Trans. D. Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K, (1970). Philosophy, Vol. 2. Trans. E.B. Ashton. ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S.K. (1951). Philosophy in a new key. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lannigan, R. (1972). Speaking and semiology. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, K. (1980). A primer on ethnomethodology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddi, S. (1967). The existential neurosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 72 (4): 311–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, V. (1977). Mead's model of self and phenomenology: An empirical analysis, The Wisconsin Sociologist (Winter).

  • Malhotra, V. (1983). The social construction of self as formulated in Meadian autobiographies. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction. Detroit.

  • Malhotra, V. (1984). Research as critical reflection: A study of self, time, and communicative competency. Humanity and Society (Fall).

  • Marcuse, H. (1966). Eros and civilization. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1964). The economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844. Ed. D.J. Struik, New York: International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1959), The philosophy of the present. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1964). Selected writings. Ed. A.J. Reck. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C.N. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, D., Glazer, N., and Denney, R. (1953). The lonely crowd. New York: Doubleday

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurmann, R. (1978). Political thinking in Heidegger. Social Research 45:191–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. (1981a). Heidegger and deep ecology. Paper presented at the Heidegger Symposium. North Texas State University.

  • Zimmerman, M. (1981b). The eclipse of self. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malhotra, V.A. A comparison of Mead's “self” and Heidegger's “Dasein”: Toward a regrounding of social psychology. Hum Stud 10, 357–382 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157605

Keywords

Navigation