Abstract
Actually possible and conceivable future uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and germ-line genetic intervention in assisted reproduction seem to offer increasing possibilities of choosing the kind of persons that will be brought to existence. Many are troubled by the idea of these technologies being used for enhancement purposes. How can we make sense of this worry? Why are our thoughts about therapeutic genetic interventions and non-genetic enhancement (for instance education) not accompanied by the same intuitive uneasiness? I argue that the concepts of autonomy and freedom of choice, typically invoked to delimit the morally acceptable uses of reproductive technologies, cannot fully answer these questions. Instead, I suggest that an alternative answer might begin with reflections on the notion of interfering with nature. Drawing on Martin Heidegger’s critique of modern technology and Hans Jonas’s moral philosophy, I outline an argument that attempts to capture what might be particularly troubling about the idea of “designing” future persons. At the core of the argument is the suggestion that enhancing selections and modifications on embryos might be bound up with an instrumentalising, non-responsive perspective on the future persons into which they are intended to grow.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agar N. (2004) Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement. London, Blackwell
Anderson W.F. (1985) Human Gene Therapy: Scientific and Ethical Considerations. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10: 275–291
Barclay L. (2003) Genetic Engineering and Autonomous Agency. Journal of Applied Philosophy 20: 223–236
Buchanan A., Brock D.W., Daniels N., Wilker D. (2000) From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Campbell, J. and G. Stock: 2000, ‘The Realities of Human Germline Engineering’ in: G. Stock, and J. Campbell (eds.), Engineering the Human Germline. New York: Oxford University Press
Cole-Turner R. (1998) Do Means Matter? In: Parens E. (ed.) Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications. Washington, Georgetown University Press
Davis D.S. (2001) Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices, and Children’s Futures. New York, Routledge
Dennis C. (2004) Genetics: Deaf by Design. Nature 431: 894–896
Dworkin G. (1988) The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Faden R.R., Beauchamp T.L. (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Feinberg, J.: 1980, ‘The Child’s Right to an Open Future’ Reprinted in: J. Feinberg (ed.), 1992, Freedom and Fulfilment: Philosophical Essays. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press
Frankfurt H.G. (1971) Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. Journal of Philosophy 68(1): 5–20
Gadamer H.-G. (1996) The Enigma of Health: The Art of Healing in a Scientific Age. Stanford, Stanford University Press
Habermas J. (2003) The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge, Polity Press
Harris J. (1998) Clones, Genes, and Immortality: Ethics and the Genetic Revolution. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Heidegger, M.: 1977, ‘The Question Concerning Technology’ in: The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row
Hood, L.: 2000, ‹The Human Genome Project — Launch Pad for Human Genetic Engineering’ in: G. Stock, and J. Campbell (eds.), Engineering the Human Germline. New York: Oxford University Press
Jonas H. (1984) The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press
Juengst E.T. (1997) Can Enhancement Be Distinguished from Prevention in Genetic Medicine? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22: 125–142
Kitcher P. (1996) The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities. London, Allen Lane The Penguin Press
Norman R. (1996) Interfering with Nature. Journal of Applied Philosophy 13: 1–11
Pellegrino E.D., Thomasma D.C. (1993) The Virtues in Medical Practice. New York, Oxford University Press
Rawls J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ricoeur P. (1994) Oneself as Another. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Robertson J.A. (2003) Extending Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: The Ethical Debate. Ethical Issues in New Uses of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Human Reproduction 18: 465–471
Singer P. (2005) Ethics and Intuitions. The Journal of Ethics 9: 331–352
Svenaeus F. (2001) The Hermeneutics of Medicine and the Phenomenology of Health: Steps Towards a Theory of Medical Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Wasserman D.T. (2003) My Fair Baby: What’s Wrong with Parents Genetically Enhancing Their Children? In: Gehring V.V. (ed.) Genetic Prospects: Essays on Biotechnology, Ethics, and Public Policy. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham
Westerlund K. (2002) Sammanhangets mening. En empirisk studie av livsåskådningar i föreställningar om genteknik och i berättelser om barnlöshet, assisterad befruktning och adoption. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala
Zeiler, K.: 2005, Chosen Children? An empirical study and a philosophical analysis of moral aspects of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and germ-line gene therapy. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Arts and Science
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malmqvist, E. Analysing our qualms about “designing” future persons: Autonomy, freedom of choice, and interfering with nature. Med Health Care and Philos 10, 407–416 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9052-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-007-9052-8