Skip to main content
Log in

Non-clause-bounded reflexives in modern Icelandic

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aass, Kristin: 1979, Refleksivitet i Moderne Norsk: Om Bruken av Seg og Sin' (Hovedoppgave, Institutt for nordisk spraak og litteratur, University of Oslo).

  • Anderson, Stephen R.: 1982, ‘Types of Dependency in Anaphora: Icelandic (and other) Reflexives’,Journal of Linguistic Research 2, 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Avery: 1976, ‘The VP Complement Analysis in Modern Icelandic’NELS 6, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Avery: 1982 ‘The Representation of Case in Modern Icelandic’, in Bresnan (ed.).The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (MIT Press), pp. 427–503.

  • Bach, Emmon and Barbara Partee: 1980, ‘Anaphora and Semantic Structure’,CLS Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, pp. 1–28.

  • Bresnan, Joan: 1982, ‘Control and Complementation’, in Bresnan (ed.),The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, (MIT Press), pp. 282–390.

  • Bresnan, Joan, Per-Kristian Halvorsen and Joan Maling: (to appear), ‘Invariants of Anaphoric Binding Systems’.

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1980, ‘On Binding’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding (Foris, Dordrecht,).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G. N.: 1975, ‘The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: its Role in Discourse’,J. West African Languages 10, 141–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Peter and Gabriella Hermon: 1981, ‘Subjecthood and Islandhood Evidence from Quechua’,Linguistic Inquiry 12, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin: 1981, ‘Binding and Logophoricity’ (Paper presented at the Stanford Workshop on Nontransformational Syntax, June, 1981).

  • Culicover, Peter: 1976, ‘A Constraint on Coreferentiality’,Foundations of Language 14, 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet: 1981, ‘Multiple Gaps in English and Swedish’,Papers from the Sixth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (Røros, Norway).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbert, Wayne: 1981, ‘Should Binding Refer to Subject’,NELS 12, 116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbert, Wayne: 1982, ‘In Defense of Tense’,Linguistic Analysis 9, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellan, Lars: 1982, ‘Semantic and Functional Government of Reflexives in Norwegian’,Papers from the Sixth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 60–74.

  • Hyman, Larry and Bernard Comrie: 1981, ‘Logophoric Reference in Gokana’,J. African Languages and Linguistics 3, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1975, ‘On Belief-Contexts’,Linguistic Inquiry 6, 53–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juntune, Thomas W.: 1978, ‘Reflexivization and Reflexive Verbs in Icelandic’,NLML 3, 419–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard S.: 1981, ‘ECP Extensions’,Linguistic Inquiry 12, 93–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan: 1978, ‘Conditions, Empty Nodes and Markedness’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 551–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Lori and Jane Simpson: 1981, ‘Quirky Case and Lexical Representation of Icelandic Verbs’,Chicago Linguistics Society 17, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, Joan: 1980, ‘Inversion in Embedded Clauses in Modern Icelandic’,Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræσi 2, 174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, Joan: 1982a, ‘Non-Clause Bounded Reflexives in Icelandic’,Papers from the Sixth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, pp. 90–106.

  • Maling, Joan: 1982b, ‘Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic’, Paper read at the Workshop on Scandinavian Syntax (Trondheim, Norway, June, 1982); to appear in L. Hellan and K. Koch-Christensen (eds.)Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, (Reidel, Dordrecht).

  • Mating, Joan and Annie Zaenen: 1978, ‘The Nonuniversality of a Surface Filter’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 475–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maling, Joan and Annie Zaenen: 1982, ‘A Phrase-Structure Account of Scandinavian Extraction Phenomena’, in P. Jacobson and G. Pullum (eds.),The Nature of Syntactic Representation (Reidel, Dordrecht), pp. 229–282.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec: 1981, ‘On the Nature of Grammatical Relations’ (unpublished M.I.T. doctoral dissertation).

  • Mohanan, K. P.: 1982, ‘Grammatical Relations and Anaphora in Malayalam’, in A. Marantz and T. Stowell (eds.),MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers in Syntax,4, 163–190.

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1976, ‘The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora’ (unpublished MIT doctoral dissertation).

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, ‘Conference and Bound Anaphora:A Restatement of the Anaphora Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivero, Maria-Luisa: 1975, ‘Referential Properties of Spanish Noun Phrases’,Language 51, 32–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thráinsson, Höskuldur: 1976a, ‘Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic,’NELS 6, 225–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thráinsson, Höskuldur: 1976b, ‘Some Arguments against the Interpretive Theory of Pronouns and Reflexives’,Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 2, 573–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thráinsson, Höskuldur: 1979, ‘On Complementation in Icelandic’, (Garland Publishing, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maling, J. Non-clause-bounded reflexives in modern Icelandic. Linguist Philos 7, 211–241 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627706

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627706

Keywords

Navigation