Skip to main content
Log in

On the status of proofs by contradiction in the seventeenth century

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I show that proofs by contradiction were a serious problem in seventeenth century mathematics and philosophy. Their status was put into question and positive mathematical developments emerged from such reflections. I analyse how mathematics, logic, and epistemology are intertwined in the issue at hand. The mathematical part describes Cavalieri's and Guldin's mathematical programmes of providing a development of parts of geometry free of proofs by contradiction. The logical part shows how the traditional Aristotelean doctrine that perfect demonstrations are causal demonstrations influenced the reflection on proofs by contradiction. The main protagonist of this part is Wallis. Finally, I analyse some epistemological developments arising from the Cartesian tradition. In particular, I look at Arnauld's programme of providing an epistemologically motivated reformulation of Geometry free of proofs by contradiction. The conclusion explains in which sense these epistemological reflections can be compared with those informing contemporary intuitionism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, K.: 1985, ‘Cavalieri's Method of Indivisibles’, Archives for the History of Exact Sciences 31, 291–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnauld, A.: 1667, Nouveaux Élémens de Géométrie, Paris.

  • Arnauld, A.: 1775–81, Oeuvres de Messire Antoine Arnauld ..., Du Pac de Bellegarde and Hautefage eds., Paris.

  • Arnauld, A. and P. Nicole: 1662, Logique de Port Royal, Paris.

  • Arnauld, A. and P. Nicole, 1872, The Port-Royal Logic, trans. by Thomas Spencer Baynes, 7th ed., Edinburgh.

  • Barozzi, F.: 1560, Opusculum, in quo una Oratio, & duae Quaestiones: altera de certitudine, & altera de medietate Mathematicarum continentur, Padua.

  • Barrow, I.: 1734, The Utility of Mathematical Learning being ..., London.

  • Beeson, M.: 1985, Foundations of Constructive Mathematics, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belaval, Y.: 1960, Leibniz Critique de Descartes, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancani, G.: 1615, De natura mathematicarum, Bononiae.

  • Bopp, K.: 1902, ‘Antoine Arnauld, der grosse Arnauld, als Mathematiker’, Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der mathematischer Wissenschaften, Bd. 14, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B. A.: 1972, ‘Towards an Aristotelean Theory of Scientific Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 39, 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri, B.: 1635, Geometria indivisibilibus continuorum nova quadam ratione promota, Bononiae.

  • Cavalieri, B.: 1647, Exercitationes Geometricae Sex, Bononiae.

  • Cavalieri, B.: 1966, Geometria degli indivisibili, translated with Introduction and Notes by L. Lombardo Radice, UTET, Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gottignies, G. F.: 1669, Elementa Geometriae Planae, Angeli Bernado, Romae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R.: 1897–1913, Oeuvres, Adam and Tannery eds., Paris.

  • Dummett, M.: 1977, Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabry, H.: 1669, Synopsis Geometrica, Lugduni Gallorum.

  • Giacobbe, G. C.: 1972a, ‘Il commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum di Alessandro Piccolomini’, Physis 14(2), 162–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacobbe, G. C.: 1972b, ‘Francesco Barozzi e la Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum’, Physis 14(4), 357–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacobbe, G. C.: 1976, ‘Epigoni nel seicento della “Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum”: Giuseppe Biancani’, Physis 18(1), 5–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacobbe, G. C.: 1977, ‘Un gesuita progressista nella “Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum” rinascimentale: Benito Pereyra’, Physis 19, 51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusti, E.: 1980, Bonaventura Cavalieri and the Theory of Indivisibles, Cremonese, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guldin, P.: 1635–41, Centroborycae, G. Gelbhaar, Viennae Austriae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. and U. Remes: 1974, The Method of Analysis, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T.: 1660: Examinatio et emendatio mathematicae odiernae, qualis explicatur in libris Johannis Wallisii distributa in sex dialogos, in Hobbes, T.: 1865, Vol. IV.

  • Hobbes, T.: 1865, Opera Philosophica quae Latine scripsit, ed. W. Molesworth, London.

  • Jardine, N.: 1988, ‘The Epistemology of the Sciences’, in Schmitt and Skinner (eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 658–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (ed.): 1967, Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics, North Holland.

  • Mancosu, P.: forthcoming, ‘Aristotelean Logic and Euclidean Mathematics: Seventeenth Century Developments of the Quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum’. Accepted for publication in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.

  • Pardies, G. I.: 1671, Élémens de Géométrie, Paris; 2d ed., 1673.

  • Pascal, B.: 1963, Oeuvres Complètes, Editions du Seuil, pp. 348–59.

  • Pererius, B.: 1576, De communibus omnium rerum naturalium principiis et affectionibus libri quindecim, Rome.

  • Philosophical Transactions: 1670, London, Vol. 5, pp. 2054–57. Reprinted by Johnson Reprint Corporation and Klaus Reprint Corporation, New York, 1963.

  • Piccolomini, A.: 1547, Commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum, Padua.

  • Proclus: 1970, A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid's Elements, translated with Introduction and Notes by Glenn R. Morrow, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivaltus, D.: 1615, APXIMHΔOYΣ ПANTA ΣΩZOMENA, Archimedia opera quae extant novis demonstrationibus commentariisque illustrata per Davidem Rivaltum a Flurantia ..., Parisiis.

  • Scaliger, J.: 1594, Iosephi Scaligeri ... Cyclometrica elementa duo, Lugduni Batavorum.

  • Szabó, A. K.: 1976, The Beginnings of Greek Mathematics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torricelli, E.: 1644, ‘De Solido Hyperbolico Acuto’, in Opera Geometrica, Florentiae. Reprinted in G. Loria and G. Vassura (eds.), Opere di Evangelista Torricelli, Stabilimento Tipografico Montanari, Faenza, pp. 1919–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemin, J.: 1962, Philosophie de l'Algebre, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuillemin, J.: 1981, ‘Trois Philosophes Intuitionistes: Epicure, Descartes et Kant’, Dialectica 35(1–2), 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, J.: 1655, Arithmetica Infinitorum, London. Reprinted in Wallis, 1696–99, Vol. 1.

  • Wallis, J.: 1665, Mathesis Universalis: sive aritheticum opus integrum, London. Reprinted in Wallis, 1696–99, Vol. 1.

  • Wallis, J.: 1685, A Treatise of Algebra, London. Reprinted in Wallis, 1696–99, Vol. 2.

  • Wallis, J.: 1687, Institutio Logicae, London. Reprinted in Wallis, 1696–99, Vol. 3.

  • Wallis, J.: 1696–99, Opera Mathematica, Oxonii, 3 vols.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mancosu, P. On the status of proofs by contradiction in the seventeenth century. Synthese 88, 15–41 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540091

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540091

Keywords

Navigation