Abstract
Applied ethicists say little about résumé embellishment. Presumably, this is so because résumé embellishment seems obviously wrong; an instance of ordinary lying, familiar moral prohibitions against which cover the case completely. Analysis of résumé embellishment merely as ordinary lying overlooks its collective action aspects. Taking account of those aspects and their implications, I argue on consequentialist grounds that, given some plausible background conditions, a limited form of résumé embellishment is morally permissible (and perhaps required). This outcome is a particular instantiation of a more general principle about how one ought to act when participating in a morally valuable co-ordinative practice. I conclude by identifying implications for how employers ought to use résumés in hiring decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- E:
-
embellish
- MAD:
-
mutually assured destruction
- NE:
-
no-embellish
- REAP:
-
résumé ethics and prudence
References
Carr, A.: 1968, ‘Is Business Bluffing Ethical?’, Harvard Business Review 46(January/February), 143–153.
R. Green (1990) ArticleTitle‘When is “Everyone’s Doing It” a Moral Justification?’ Business Ethics Quarterly 1 75–93
R. Hardin (1988) Morality Within the Limits of Reason University of Chicago Press Chicago
M. Olson (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass
T. Schelling (1963) The Strategy of Conflict Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass
R. Solomon (1999) ArticleTitle‘Game Theory as a Model for Business and Business Ethics’ Business Ethics Quarterly 9 11–29
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marcoux, A.M. A Counterintuitive Argument for Résumé Embellishment. J Bus Ethics 63, 183–194 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-2412-5
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-2412-5