Abstract
The concept of ‘humane healthcare’ cannot and may not be limited to a personal virtue. For elucidating its meaning and making it functional as a critical ethical criterion for healthcare as a social institution, it is necessary to reflect on the social, cultural, and historical conditions in which modern healthcare finds its offspring and its further development. Doing this is the object and aim of social ethics. Social ethics in itself covers a broad area of different approaches. A main division can be made between a liberal and a communitarian approach. This article focuses on the latter and concentrates on one of its representatives, Charles Taylor. The paper starts with two clarifying paragraphs: one about the terms humane and human, a second about the scope of social ethics. Next, because the term humane presupposes a certain view of man, attention will be paid to the lack of consensus in this respect within modernity, using some reflections of Taylor. In his view, resigning in this lack is a threat for one of the main motives behind modernity: the pursuit of a good and meaningful life. In the following section Taylor's analysis is applied to contemporary healthcare, by means of two examples. At the end the question is raised how to promote humane healthcare? In a short and conclusive sketch, three suggestions are offered for further research: scrutiny of goals and meanings within healthcare and culture, the broadening of the concept of autonomy and the upholding of human dignity as an intrinsic and imperative value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anzenbacher, A.: 1997, Christliche Sozialethik, Einführung und Prinzipien.Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
Buchanan, A.: 1995, 'Community and Communitarianism', in: W.T. Reich (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics (Macmillan Library Reference USA: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York), pp. 464–471.
Frankfurter Algemeine, 18-8-1989.
Graaf, J. de.: 1984, Elementair begrip van de ethiek.Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.
Janssens, R.: 2001, Palliative Care. Concepts and Ethics. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.
Kerber, W.: 1998, Sozialethik.Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln: W. Kohlhammer.
MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.
Nozick, R.: 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia.New York: Basic Books.
Oderwald, A. and J. Rolies, De huid van de geneeskunde. Pleidooi voor een narratieve medische ethiek. Zeist: Kerckebosch bv.
Pijnenburg, M. and Kirkels, V. (eds): 1999, Dementie als schrikbeeld. Wijsgerige, ethische en gelovige gezichtspunten. Nijmegen: Valkhof Pers.
Rawls, J.: 1973, A Theory of Justice.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rendtorff, J.D. and P. Kemp: 2000, Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw. Vol I: Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability.Barcelona: Institut Borja de Bioètica.
Ricoeur, P.: 1968, 'Medemens en naaste', in: A. Peperzak (ed.), Politiek en geloof. Utrecht: Ambo, pp. 18–31.
Ricoeur, P.: 1995, Het probleem van de grondslagen van de moraal. Kampen: Kok Agora.
Sulmasy, D.P.: 1997, The Healers Calling. A Spirituality for Physicians and Other Health Care Professionals. Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press.
Taylor, Ch.: 1989, Sources of The Self. The Making of the Modern Identity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Ch.: 1992, The Ethics of Authenticity.Cambridge, Massachusetts / London, England: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, Ch: 1999, 'A Catholic Modernity?' in: J.L. Heft (ed.), A Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor's Marianist Award Lecture. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–38.
Walzer, M.: 1983, Spheres of Justice. A Defence of Pluralism and Equality.Oxford: Robertson.
Webster: 1996, The New International Webster's Comprehensive Dictionary of the English Language.Naples, Florida: Trident Promotional Corporation.
Zola, I.K. and J.B. McKinlay: 1974, Organizational Issues in the Delivery of Health Services; a Selection of Articles from the Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly.New York: Prodist.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pijnenburg, M. Humane healthcare as a theme for social ethics. Med Health Care Philos 5, 245–252 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021192617322
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021192617322