Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Improved fallows: a case study of an adaptive response in Amazonian swidden farming systems

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many smallholders in the Amazon employ swidden (slash-and-burn) farming systems in which forest or forest fallows are the primary source of natural soil enrichment. With decreasing opportunities to claim natural forests for agriculture and shrinking landholdings, rotational agriculture on smaller holdings allows insufficient time for fallow to regenerate naturally into secondary forest. This case study examines how Peruvian farmers use “improved fallows” as an adaptive response to a situation of decreasing soil fertility and how the farmers describe the rationale underlying the various actions taken in these modified fallow systems. The results indicate that farmers establish improved fallows using contextual ecological knowledge and various techniques to introduce a large diversity of tree species. This practice is also used to restore degraded land to agricultural production. The tasks of maintaining productivity on agricultural land and reforesting degraded areas is becoming increasingly urgent in the Amazon, making agricultural practices that involve reforestation and tree management highly relevant. Since swidden farming systems are the basis for the livelihoods of most Amazon smallholders, good farming practices elaborated by swidden farmers are important for sustainable small-scale family farming systems in the Amazon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alegre, J., M. Rao, L. Arevalo, W. Guzman, and M. Faminow. 2005. Planted tree fallows for improving productivity in the humid tropics of Peru. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 110: 104–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, M.T., and D.C. Nepstad. 2006. Smallholders, the Amazon’s new conservationists. Conservation Biology 20: 1553–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, M.J., and L.A. LaValle. 2011. Food security and biodiversity: Can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values 28: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon, R.L., C.A. Peres, D. Dent, D. Sheil, A.E. Lugo, D. Lamb, N.E. Stork, and S.E. Miller. 2009. The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conservation Biology 23: 1406–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes, O.T., and N. Ban. 2004. Cultivated plant species diversity in home gardens of an Amazonian peasant village in northeastern Peru. Economic Botany 58: 420–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, W., U. Chokkalingam, and G.A.D. Perera. 2001. The evolution of swidden fallow secondary forests in Asia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 13: 800–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defoer, T., and A. Budelman. 2000. Managing soil fertility in the tropics. Resource guide. The Netherlands’s Royal Tropical Institute (KIT). Amsterdam: FAO and KIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPA-AA. 2008. Challenges to managing ecosystem sustainability for poverty alleviation: Securing well-being in the Andes/Amazon. Situation analysis prepared for the ESPA Program. Belém, Brazil: Amazon Initiative Consortium.

  • FAO. 2001. Global forest resource assessment 2000. Main report, FAO Forestry Paper No. 140. Rome, Italy: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaka, S., and D. White. 1998. Pasture or permanent crops after slash-and-burn cultivation? Land-use choice in three Amazon colonies. Agroforestry Systems 42: 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno Regional de San Martín. 2008. Plan de concertado de desarolllo departemental de San Martín 2008–2015. Moyobamba, Peru: Gobierno Regional de San Martín.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godar, J., E.J. Tizado, and B. Pokorny. 2012. Who is responsible for the deforestation in the Amazon? A spatially explicit analysis along the Tranzamazon Highway in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 267: 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Vélez, V.H., R. DeFries, M. Pinedo-Vásquez, M. Uriarte, C. Padoch, W. Baethgen, K. Fernades, and Y. Lim. 2011. High-yield oil palm expansion spares land at the expense of the forest in the Peruvian Amazon. Environmental Research Letter 6: 044029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A.J. 2010. Earth into property. Colonization, decolonization, and capitalism. Montreal & Kingston: Mc-Gill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P.D., W.M. Adams, J.P. Brosius, A. Zia, N. Bariola, and J.-L. Dammert. 2010. Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity. Conservation Biology 25: 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEI. 2007. Perú: Anuario de Estadísticas Ambientales 2007. Lima: INEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEI. 2006. Compendio estadístico 2006. Lima: INEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEI. 1996. Perfil agropecuario del Departamento de San Martín. Lima, Peru: INEI. http://www.inei.gob.pe/Sisd/index.asp. Accessed 30 March 2008.

  • Kass, D.C.L., C. Foletti, L.T. Szott, R. Landaverde, and R. Nolasco. 1993. Traditional fallow systems of the Americas. Agroforest Systems 23: 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrap, D. 1970. The upper Amazon. Southampton: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lojka, B., J. Lojkova, J. Banout, Z. Polesny, and D. Preininger. 2008. Performance of an improved fallow system in the Peruvian Amazon—modelling approach. Agroforestry Systems 72: 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt Arévalo, K. 2008. Burning changes: Action research with farmers and swidden agriculture in the Upper Amazon. PhD dissertation. Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

  • Marquardt, K., R. Milestad, and R. Porro. 2012. Farmers’ perspectives on vital soil-related ecosystem services in intensive swidden farming systems in the Peruvian Amazon. Human Ecology 12. doi:10.1007/s10745-012-9522-3.

  • MEA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Millenium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertz, O., C. Padoch, J. Fox, R. Cramb, S.J. Leisz, N. Thanh Lam, and T. Duc Vien. 2009. Swidden change in southeast Asia: Understanding causes and consequences. Human Ecology 37: 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meza, A., C. Sabogal, and W. de Jong. 2006. Rehabilitación de áreas degradadas en la Amazonia peruana. Revisión de experiencias y lecciones aprendidas. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.P., and P.K.R. Nair. 2006. Indigenous agroforestry systems in Amazonia: From prehistory to today. Agroforest Systems 66: 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., R. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., K. Coffey, O. Mertz, S.J. Leisz, J. Fox, and R.L. Wadely. 2007. The demise of swidden in southeast Asia? Local realities and regional ambiguities. Danish Journal of Geography 107: 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padoch, C., and M. Pinedo-Vásquez. 2010. Saving slash-and-burn to save biodiversity. Biotropica 42: 550–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palm, C.A., S.A. Vosti, P.A. Sanchez, and P.J. Ericksen. 2005. Slash-and-burn agriculture. The search for alternatives. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perz, S.G. 2004. Are agricultural production and forest conservation compatible? Agricultural diversity, agricultural incomes, and primary forest cover among small farm colonists in the Amazon. World Development 32: 957–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfund, J.L., J.D. Watts, M. Boissière, A. Boucard, R.M. Bullock, A. Ekadinata, S. Dewi, L. Feintrenie, P. Levang, S. Rantala, D. Sheil, T.C. Heethom Sunderland, and Z.L. Urech. 2011. Understanding and integrating local perceptions of trees and forests into incentives for sustainable landscape management. Environmental Management 48(2): 350. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9689-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokorny, B., J. Godar, L. Hoch, L. Johnson, J. de Koning, G. Medina, R. Steinbrenner, V. Vos, and J. Weigelt. 2010. La producción familiar como alternativa de un desarrollo sostenible para la Amazonía: Lecciones aprendidas de iniciativas de uso forestal por productores familiares en la Amazonía boliviana, brasilera, ecuatoriana y peruana. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robiglio, V., and F. Sinclair. 2011. Maintaining the conservation value of shifting cultivation landscapes requires spatially explicit interventions. Environmental Management 48(2): 289–306. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9611-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salati, E., and P. Vose. 1984. Amazon Basin: A system in equilibrium. Science 225(4658): 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth, G., J. Lehmann, M. Rodrigues, E. Barros, and J. Macedo. 2001. Plant-soil interactions in multistrata agroforestry in the humid tropics. Agroforestry Systems 53: 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szott, L., C. Palm, and R. Buresh. 1999. Ecosystem fertility and fallow function in the humid and subhumid tropics. Agroforestry Systems 47: 163–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadley, R.L. 2007. Slashed and burned: War, environment, and resource insecurity in West Borneo during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 13: 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature). 2009. Challenges, opportunities, and critical aspects regarding the possible implementation of REDD in Peru. Report No. 5. WWF.

  • Yanggen, D., and T. Reardon. 2001. Kudzu-improved fallows in the Peruvian Amazon. In Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation, ed. A. Angelsen, and D. Kaimowitz, 213–230. Jakarta, Indonesia: CABI Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

    Kristina Marquardt, Rebecka Milestad & Lennart Salomonsson

Authors
  1. Kristina Marquardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecka Milestad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lennart Salomonsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Marquardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marquardt, K., Milestad, R. & Salomonsson, L. Improved fallows: a case study of an adaptive response in Amazonian swidden farming systems. Agric Hum Values 30, 417–428 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9415-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9415-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation