Notes
See W. V. Quine, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,”Philosophical Review, 60:20–43 (1951), and M. G. White, “The Analytic and the Synthetic: An Untenable Dualism,” inJohn Dewey: Philosopher of Science and Freedom, ed. by S. Hook (New York: Dial Press, 1950), pp. 316-30. For a summary and an interesting discussion of these papers, see Benson Mates, “Analytic Sentences,”Philosophical Review, 60:525-34 (1951).
SeeMeaning and Necessity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947) andThe Logical Foundations of Probability (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950), Chap. 111.
See A. Church,Introduction to Mathematical Logic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944), p. 37.
See A. Tarski, “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen,”Studia Philosophica, 1:261–405 (1936), esp. pp. 267-79.
Quine, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” pp. 31–32.
Ibid., p. 33, and White, “The Analytic and the Synthetic,” pp. 321-22.
Carnap,Logical Foundations of Probability, p. 3.
Seeibid., pp. 289, 295, and passim.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, R.M. On ‘Analytic’. Philos Stud 3, 42–47 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333167
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333167