Skip to main content
Log in

On ‘Analytic’

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. See W. V. Quine, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,”Philosophical Review, 60:20–43 (1951), and M. G. White, “The Analytic and the Synthetic: An Untenable Dualism,” inJohn Dewey: Philosopher of Science and Freedom, ed. by S. Hook (New York: Dial Press, 1950), pp. 316-30. For a summary and an interesting discussion of these papers, see Benson Mates, “Analytic Sentences,”Philosophical Review, 60:525-34 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  2. SeeMeaning and Necessity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947) andThe Logical Foundations of Probability (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950), Chap. 111.

  3. See A. Church,Introduction to Mathematical Logic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1944), p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See A. Tarski, “Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen,”Studia Philosophica, 1:261–405 (1936), esp. pp. 267-79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quine, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” pp. 31–32.

  6. Ibid., p. 33, and White, “The Analytic and the Synthetic,” pp. 321-22.

  7. Carnap,Logical Foundations of Probability, p. 3.

  8. Seeibid., pp. 289, 295, and passim.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, R.M. On ‘Analytic’. Philos Stud 3, 42–47 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333167

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333167

Navigation