Skip to main content
Log in

Singular causal explanations

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Singular causal explanations cite explicitly, or may be paraphrased to cite explicitly, a particular factor as the cause of another particular factor. During recent years there has emerged a consensus account of the nature of an important feature of such explanations, the distinction between a factor regarded correctly in a given context of inquiry as ‘the cause’ of a given result and those other causally relevant factors, sometimes called ‘mere conditions’, which are not regarded correctly in that context of inquiry as the cause of that result. In this paper that consensus account is characterized and developed. The developed version is then used to illuminate some recent discussions of singular causal explanations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. S. F. Barker, ‘The Role of Simplicity in Explanation’ in Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961, pp. 265–274.

  2. D. Davidson, ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’, Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963) 685–700.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. J. Ducasse, Causation and the Types of Necessity, University of Washington, 1924.

  4. C. J. Ducasse, Nature, Mind and Death, Open Court, 1951.

  5. C. J. Ducasse, “‘Cause’ and ‘Condition’”, Journal of Philosophy 63 (1966) 238–241.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Feinberg, ‘Causing Voluntary Actions’ in Metaphysics and Explanation (ed. by W. Capitan and D. Merrill), University of Pittsburgh, 1964, pp. 29–47 and pp. 55–61.

  7. S. Gorovitz, ‘Causal Judgments and Causal Explanations’, Journal of Philosophy 62 (1965) 695–711.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Gorovitz, ‘Aspects of the Pragmatics of Explanation’, Nous 3 (1969) 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Hart and A. Honore, Causation in the Law, Oxford 1959.

  10. C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, 1965.

  11. A. Lyon, ‘Causality’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (1967) 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. S. Mill, A System of Logic, 8th ed., Longman's Green and Co., 1896.

  13. M. Scriven, ‘Causes, Connections and Conditions in History’, in Philosophical Analysis and History (ed. by W. Dray), Harper and Row, 1966, pp. 238–320.

  14. R. Shope, “Explanations in Terms of ‘The Cause’”, Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967) 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. White, Foundations of Historical Knowledge, Harper and Row, 1965.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Work on this paper was supported by a University of Maryland Faculty Research Award. Earlier versions were read at the University of Minnesota and at the 1971 Western Division meetings of the American Philosophical Association. I have profited from criticisms raised on these occasions. I am especially grateful for the comments of James Lesher, Peter Machamer, John Vollrath, and the students in my Macalester College seminar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, R. Singular causal explanations. Theor Decis 2, 221–237 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137875

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137875

Keywords

Navigation