Abstract
This article presents different semiotic perspectives on biological mimicry, which is considered to be a communicative system consisting of a mimic, a model, and a signal-receiver. Proceeding from the writings of Thomas A. Sebeok, the activity of the mimic and the relationship between mimicry and iconicity are analyzed. From the signal-receiver's perspective, mimicry is described as a probable mistake in recognition and it is characterized by the notion of ambivalent sign. Ambivalent sign is a stable sign structure fiuctuating between one and two signs. On the basis of Jakob von Uexküll's works, mimicry resemblance is described as taking place in animal Umwelten. From this semiotic viewpoint, various examples of abstract resemblance in nature are regarded as ‘resemblance with meaning’ and an alternative explanation to the concept of abstract mimicry is presented.
About the author
His research interests include theory of biological mimicry, imitation, deception, and animal communication. His recent publications include ‘Mimicry: Towards a semiotic understanding of nature’ (2001); ‘Ecosemiotic basis of locality’ (2002); ‘Mimesis as a phenomenon of semiotic communication’ (2003); and ‘Gardens and gardening: An ecosemiotic view’ (2004).
© Walter de Gruyter
