Researching social influences on decision making: The case for qualitative methods

[1] Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bačová, V. (2008). Klasické normatívne teórie rozhodovania — psychologické dimenzie. In I. Ruisel (Ed.), Myslenie — osobnosť — múdrosť (pp. 77–96). Bratislava: Slovak Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bačová, V. (2010). Psychológia posudzovania a rozhodovania. In V. Bačová (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie III.: Aspekty, javy, aplikácie (pp. 14–43). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bačová, V. (2013). Preferencie a efekt atraktivity v rozhodovnaní. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V: Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní (pp. 45–68). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Ballová-Mikušková, E. (2013). Intuícia: Dobrý sluha, zlý pán ? In R. Hanák, E. Ballová — Mikušková, & V. Čavojová (Eds.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie IV.: Aplikácie a limity intuície (pp. 34–47). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bašnáková, J. (2013). Skúmanie sociálnych vplyvov na rozhodovanie: kvantitatívne metódy. In R. Masaryk, (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V: Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní (pp. 17–43). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Brezina, I. (2013a). Kognitívny a hodnotovy kontext kultúrnych rozdielov v rozhodovaní. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V: Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní (pp. 115–132). Bratislava: ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Brezina, I. (2013b). Medzikultúrny vyskum osobnostnych aspektov rozhodovania. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V: Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní (pp. 133–148). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Čavojová, V. (2010). Rola emócií v rozhodovaní a ekonomickom správaní. In V. Bačová (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie I.: Pohľady psychológie a ekonómie (pp. 133–161). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Čavojová, V., Hanák, R. (in press). How much information do you need? Interaction of intuitive processing with expertise. Studia Psychologica, accepted manuscript. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dudeková, K. (2013). Sociálne referenční. In R. Masaryk, R. (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V: Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní (pp. 94–114). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dwyer, P. D., & Minnegal, M. (2006). The good, the bad and the ugly: Risk, uncertainty and decisionmaking by Victorian fishers. Journal of Political Ecology, 13, 1–23. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22, 16–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X022004016Search in Google Scholar

[14] Fountas, S. et al. (2006). A model of decision-making and information flows for information-intensive agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 87, 192–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2004.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[15] Geneau, R. et al. (2008). Understanding the work of general practitioners: a social science perspective on the context of medical decision making in primary care. BMC Family Practice, 9, 12. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/9/12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-9-12Search in Google Scholar

[16] Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Goethals, S., Dierckx dDe Casterle B., & Gastmans C. (2012). Nurses’ decision-making in cases of physical restraint: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(6), 1198–1210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05909.xSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Hammad, W., & Norris, N. (2009). Centralised control: A barrier to shared decision-making in Egyptian secondary schools. ISEA, 37(2), 60–73. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hanák, R., Ballová-Mikušková, E., & Čavojová, V. (Eds.). (2013). Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie IV.: Aplikácie a limity intuície. Bratislava: ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hanák, R., Sirota, M., & Juanchich, M. (2013). Experts use compensatory strategies more often than novices in hiring decisions. Studia Psychologica, 55(4), 251–263. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Jacoby, A., Smith, M., & Eccles, M. (2003). A qualitative study to explore influences on general practitioners’ decisions to prescribe new drugs. British Journal of General Practice, 53, 120–125. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1914185Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kostovičová, L. (2013). Akontabilita a zodpovednosť v rozhodovaní. In R. Masaryk, (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V: Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní (pp. 69–93). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Kostovičová, L., Dudeková, K., Sirota, M., & Bačová, V. (2013). Let’s think it through: Effects of accountability and responsibility on risk attitude are partially mediated by cognitive reflection. In SPUDM 24 — Subjective Probability, Utility and Decision Making Conference (pp. 106–107). Search in Google Scholar

[25] Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Loyens, K., & Maesschalck, J. (2010). Toward a Theoretical framework for ethical decision making of street-level bureaucracy: Existing models reconsidered. Administration & Society, 42,1, 66–100. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Masaryk, R. (2013a). Medzi človekom a ľuĎmi: Úvod do sociálnej psychológie. Bratislava: IRIS. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Masaryk, R. (2013b). Kvalitatívne prístupy k skúmaniu sociálnych vplyvov na rozhodovnie. In R. Masaryk, (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V: Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní (pp. 149–167). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Masaryk, R. (2013b). Kvalitatívne prístupy k skúmaniu sociálnych vplyvov na rozhodovnie. In R. Masaryk (Ed.), Rozhodovanie a usudzovanie V: Sociálne vplyvy v rozhodovaní (pp. 149–167). Bratislava: Ústav experimentálnej psychológie SAV. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In Crabtree, B. & Miller, W.L. (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 3–28). Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32(4), 365–380. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786541Search in Google Scholar

[34] Noblit, G., & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage Publications, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Pell, C. et al. (2011). Social and cultural factors affecting uptake of interventions for malaria in pregnancy in Africa: A systematic review of the qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 6(7), e22452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022452Search in Google Scholar

[36] Porter, S. et al. (2007). New midwifery? A qualitative analysis of midwives’ decision-making strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(5), 525–534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04449.xSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman, A. & R.G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

[38] Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2002). Reading qualitative studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1,(1), 1–47. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm/ Search in Google Scholar

[39] Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper Toorchbooks. Search in Google Scholar

[40] Simkhada, B., Porter, M. A., & van Teillingen, E. R. (2010). The role of mothers-in-law in antenatal care decision-making in Nepal: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10, 34. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/10/34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-34Search in Google Scholar

[41] Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Search in Google Scholar

[42] Tariman, J. D. et al. (2012). Physician, patient, and contextual factors affecting treatment decisions in older adults with cancer and models of decision making: A literature review. Oncology Nursing Forum, 39,(1), e70–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/12.ONF.E70-E83Search in Google Scholar

[43] Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1412188Search in Google Scholar

[44] Wainwright, S. F., Shepard, K. F., Harman, L. B., & Stephens, J. (2011). Factors that in uence the clinical decision making of novice and experienced physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 91(1), 87–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100161Search in Google Scholar