Skip to main content
Log in

Are the Precautionary Principle and the International Trade of Genetically Modified Organisms Reconcilable?

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper seeks to find possibilities forreconciliation of the implementation of theprecautionary principle and the promotion ofinternational trade of genetically modified organisms,based on the assumption that a sustainabledevelopment is a right objective to strive for. Itstarts with an explanation of the background and therole of the precautionary principle, and describes inwhat way measures based on the precautionary principlecan easily lead to the creation of trade barriers. Thearticle then examines to what extent the WTO (WorldTrade Organisation) Agreements allow theimplementation of the precautionary principle. Inaddition, structural conflicts between the perceptionof the precautionary principle and the concept oftrade liberalisation will be evoked. The last sectionof the paper analyses to what extent the WTO rulesprovide possibilities to avoid or solve theseconflicts in order to attempt to answer the mainquestion: are the precautionary principle and theinternational trade of genetically modified organismsreconcilable?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beekman, V. and F. Brom (eds), Preprints First European Congress on Agricultural and Food Ethics (Wageningen, 1999).

  • Freestone D. and E. Hey (eds), The Precautionary Principle and International Law (Kluwer Law International, 1996).

  • Godard, O., Précaution: Un principe très politique (Courrier de la Planète, 1998).

  • Godard, O. (ed), Le principe de précaution, dans la conduite des affaires humaines (INRA, 1997).

  • Hermitte, M.-A., “Les OGM et la précaution: comme un parfum de nostalgie,” in J.M. Pelt (ed), Génie Génétique, des chercheurs citoyens s'expriment (Sang de la Terre, Paris, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingrassia, A., “Trade Related Environmental Measures in the Field of Safety in Biotechnology,” in K.J. Mulongoy (ed), Transboundary Movement of Living Modified Organisms Resulting from Modern Biotechnology: Issues and Opportunities for Policy-Makers (The International Academy of the Environment, Geneva, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. Trade principles and Concepts (1995). Sands, Philippe, Principles of International Environmental Law, Volume I: Frameworks, Standards and Implementation (Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO, “ECMeasures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones),” Complaint by the United States, Report of the Panel, WT/DS26/R/USA (1997).

  • WTO, “EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones).” Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS26/AB/R (1998).

  • WTO, “Japan - Measures Affecting Agricultural Products.” Report of the Panel, WT/DS76/R (27 October 1998).

  • WTO, “Japan - Measures Affecting Agricultural Products.” Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS76/AB/R (22 February 1999).

  • WTO, “The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures” (1998).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthee, M., Vermersch, D. Are the Precautionary Principle and the International Trade of Genetically Modified Organisms Reconcilable?. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12, 59–70 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009504212205

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009504212205

Navigation