Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conflicting Experts and Dialectical Performance: Adjudication Heuristics for the Layperson

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • S. Brewer (1998) ArticleTitle‘Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process’ Yale Law Journal 107 1535–1681 Occurrence Handle10183366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • T. Burge (1993) ArticleTitle‘Content Preservation’ Philosophical Review 107 457–88

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Chakrabarti (1994) ‘Telling as Letting Know’ Bimal Krishna Matilal Arindam Chakrabarti (Eds) Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony Kluwer Dordrecht 99–1245

    Google Scholar 

  • C. A. J. Coady (1992) Testimony: A Philosophical Study Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1933, How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process, D.C. Heath & Co.

  • E. Fricker (1987) ArticleTitle‘The Epistemology of Testimony’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 61 57–83

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Fricker (1994) ‘Against Gullibility’ Bimal Krishna Matilal Arindam Chakrabarti (Eds) Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony Kluwer Dordrecht 125–162

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Fricker (1995) ArticleTitle‘Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony’ Mind 104 393–411

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Goldman (1999) Knowledge in a Social World Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Goldman (2001) ArticleTitle‘Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 85–110

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hardwig (1985) ArticleTitle‘Epistemic Dependence’ Journal of Philosophy 82 335–49

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hume ([1777] 1995) ‘An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding’ P.H. Nidditch (Eds) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals EditionNumber3 Clarendon Press Oxford 1–165

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kenny (1985) ‘The Expert in Court’, The Ivory Tower: Essays in Philosophy and Public Policy Basil Blackwell Oxford 39–62

    Google Scholar 

  • J. McDowell (1994) ‘Knowledge by Hearsay’ Bimal Krishna Matilal Arindam Chakrabarti (Eds) Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony Kluwer Dordrecht 195–224

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Montmarquet (1993) Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility Rowman & Littlefield Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • W.V.O. Quine J.S. Ullian (1978) The Web of Belief EditionNumber2 McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T.: ([1764] 1997), in Derek Brookes (ed.), An Enquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.

  • L. Zagzebski (1996) Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtues and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Zagzebski (1996) Virtues of the Mind An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtues and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Canada, K1S 5B6

    David Matheson

Authors
  1. David Matheson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Matheson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matheson, D. Conflicting Experts and Dialectical Performance: Adjudication Heuristics for the Layperson. Argumentation 19, 145–158 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-004-7041-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-004-7041-0

Search

Navigation