Abstract
It was not until the emergence, in the 19th century, of new technical devices – such as the telegraph and the phonograph – that the term medius came to serve as a collective noun (media) for advanced communication technologies. Although mediation is extensively theorized in philosophy and sociology, and is approached by medium theory and media studies, the concept remains undertheorized in the field of communication theory.
By exploring the problem of mediation and by challenging its representationalist and transmissive accounts, this paper posits mediation beyond the medium. It traces mediation as a relational principle which can be best understood as modulation involving inherent translation, inflection and movement. Mediation is not a simple transportation of meaning through a passive intermediary. It is not just something which stands or comes between things otherwise separated or opposed. Mediation is neither a middle-thing linking separate entities, nor do things get mediated: They are already forms of mediation. Mediation is, foremost, a connecting mean that generates modified experiences and relations, a modulating process that re-connects at the moment it separates.
References
Horkheimer, M., Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder10.1515/9780804788090Search in Google Scholar
Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1988). Toward a theory of mediation. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 11 (pp. 194–223). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Asp, K. (1986). Mäktiga massmedier: Studier i politisk opinionsbildning [Powerful mass media: Studies on political opinion-formation]. Stockholm: Akademilitteratur.Search in Google Scholar
Barbero, M. J. (1997). Dos meios às mediações [From the media to mediations]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFRJ.Search in Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1968). Illuminations: Essays and reflections. Ed. Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books.Search in Google Scholar
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1108/ccij.1999.4.4.208.1Search in Google Scholar
Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62, 1–20.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.xSearch in Google Scholar
Cooren, F. (2015). In medias res: Communication, existence, and materiality. Communication Research and Practice. doi:10.1080/22041451.2015.111007510.1080/22041451.2015.1110075Search in Google Scholar
Couldry, N. (2008) Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media & Society, 10(3), 373–391.10.1177/1461444808089414Search in Google Scholar
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.1201910.1111/comt.12019Search in Google Scholar
Davallon, J. (2003). La Médiation: la communication en procès? [Mediation: Communication in process?]. Médiations & Médiateurs, 19.Search in Google Scholar
Deacon, D., & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture & Society, 36(7), 1032–1044.10.1177/0163443714542218Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1995). Mediators. Negotiations: 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Galloway, A. R., Thacker, E., & Wark, M. (2013). Excommunication: Three inquiries in media and mediation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226925233.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gomes; P.G. (2016), Mediatization: a concept, multiple voices, ESSACHESS. Journal for Communication Studies, vol. 9, no. 2(18): 197–212 eISSN 1775-352XSearch in Google Scholar
Grusin, R. (2015). Radical mediation. Critical Inquiry, 42, 124–148.10.1086/682998Search in Google Scholar
Guillory, J. (2010). Genesis of the Media Concept. Critical Inquiry, v. 36, n. 2, p. 321–362,10.1086/648528Search in Google Scholar
2010Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. London: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Science of logic [trans. a. V. Miller]. London: George Allen and Unwin.Search in Google Scholar
Hepp, A. (2013). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediatization of everything’. European Journal of Communication, 28: 615–629.10.1177/0267323113501148Search in Google Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.10.1515/nor-2017-0181Search in Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder.10.1515/9780804788090Search in Google Scholar
Innis, H. (1951). The bias of communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.2307/138041Search in Google Scholar
Jansson, A. (2014). Indispensable things: On mediatization, materiality, and space. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication. Handbook of communication science (pp. 273–296). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110272215.273Search in Google Scholar
Lamizet, B. (1995). Les lieux de la communication [The places of communication]. Paris: Mardaga.Search in Google Scholar
Lievrouw, L. A. (2009) New Media, Mediation and Communication study, Information, Communication & Society, 12:3, 303–325, DOI: 10.1080/1369118080266065110.1080/13691180802660651Search in Google Scholar
Marcondes, C. (2005). Prefácio da edição brasileira de Luhman, Niklas, A realidade dos meios de comunicação [Preface of the Brazilian edition of Niklas Luhman’s ‘The reality of the mass media’]. São Paulo: Paulus.Search in Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, T. P. (1988). On mediated communication theory: The rise of format. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 11 (pp. 224–229), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.10.1080/23808985.1988.11678688Search in Google Scholar
Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Quéré, L. (1982). Des miroirs équivoques [Equivocal mirrors]. Paris: Aubier.Search in Google Scholar
Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101.10.1177/0267323104040696Search in Google Scholar
Scolari, C., & Rodríguez-Amat, J. (2018). A Latin American approach to mediatization: Specifies and contributions to a global discussion about how the media shape contemporary societies. Communication Theory, 28, 131–154.10.1093/ct/qtx004Search in Google Scholar
Serres, M. (1968). Hermès I. La communication [Hermes 1: Communication]. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar
Serres, M. (1972). Hermès II. L’interférence [Hermes 2: The interference]. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656. doi:10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-310.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xSearch in Google Scholar
Silverstone, R. (1999). Why study the media? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446219461Search in Google Scholar
Silverstone, R. (2002). Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New Literary History, 33, 745–764.10.1353/nlh.2002.0045Search in Google Scholar
Silverstone, R. (2005). The sociology of mediation and communication. In C. Calhoun, C. Rojek & B. Turner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of sociology (pp. 188–207). London: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781848608115.n1110.4135/9781848608115.n11Search in Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1994). Bridge and Door. Theory, Culture & Society, 11, 5–10.10.1177/026327694011001002Search in Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. (2006). Réenchanter le monde: La valeur esprit contre le populisme industriel [The re-enchantment of the world: The value of spirit against industrial populism]. Paris: Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, J. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Verón, E. (1997). Esquema para el análisis de la mediatización. Diálogos [Scheme for the analysis of mediatization. Dialogues]. Lima: FELAFACS, 48, 9–17.Search in Google Scholar
Verón, E. (2014). Mediatization theory: A semio-anthropological perspective. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication (pp. 163–174). London: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110272215.163Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
