E-LOGOS 2011, 18(1):1-19 | DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.301

The limits of reductionism in biology: what alternatives?

Fulvio Mazzocchi
Institute for Complex Systems of the Italian National Research Council in Monterotondo

Modern science has been grounded on reductionism at different levels from the very beginning. The reductionist approach still holds a significant influence on science, biology included, especially after the rise of molecular biology in the 1950s when biology went molecular, and life began to be interpreted as a molecular process regulated by genetic information. Reductionism resulted in becoming a very powerful analytical approach by which scientists were able to investigate many basic molecular and cellular processes. However as time passed, the limits of the reductionist project in biology have become increasingly evident. Under question was not the value of investigations at the molecular and genetic level, but rather the belief by which complex processes are reduced to certain molecules or genes and genome-phenotype relationships explained in terms of linear schemes. Life cannot be explained only on a molecular and genetic level. Biological systems should instead be understood as complex systems, which result from dynamic interactions of different components at different levels that operate as organized wholes. A different theoretical framework is required to study these systems that can lead towards a post-reductionist approach in science and biology. This paper discusses how the complexity theory can contribute to the development of this framework by providing a number of key notions, such as emergence, self-organization and complex causality.

Prepublished online: December 22, 2011; Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mazzocchi, F. (2011). The limits of reductionism in biology: what alternatives? E-LOGOS18(1), 1-19. doi: 10.18267/j.e-logos.301
Download citation

References

  1. Aderem A (2005) Systems biology: its practice and challenges. Cell 121: 511-513. Go to original source...
  2. Alexander S (1920) Space, time and deity. UK :Macmillan.
  3. Atlan H (1972) L'Organisation biologique et la théorie de l'information. Paris, France: Hermann.
  4. Atlan H (1979) Entre le Cristal et la Fumée. Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil.
  5. Atlan H (1984) Disorder, Complexity, and Meaning. In Livingston P, ed., Disorder and Order, pp. 109-128. Saratoga, CA, USA: Anma Libri.
  6. Bauchau V (2006) Emergence and reductionism: from the game of life to science of life. In Feltz B, Crommelick M, Goujon P, eds. Self-organization and Emergence in Life Science, pp. 29-40. London, UK: Springer. Go to original source...
  7. Camazine S, Deneubourg J-L, Franks NR, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-Organization in Biological Systems. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  8. Campbell DT (1974) Downward causation in hierarchically organised biological systems. In Ayala FJ, Dobzhansky T, eds., Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, pp.179-186. London, UK: Macmillan. Go to original source...
  9. Coffey DS (1998) Self-organization, complexity and chaos: the new biology for medicine. Nature Medicine 4: 882-885. Go to original source...
  10. Crick FHC (1958) Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227: 561-563. Go to original source...
  11. Damiano L (2010) Co-emergences in life and science: a double proposal for biological emergentism. Synthese.
  12. Emmeche C, Køppe S, Stjernfelt F (1997) Explaining emergence: towards an ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28: 83-119. Go to original source...
  13. von Foerster, H (1981) Observing systems. Seaside, CA, USA: Intersystems. Hempel CG (1966) Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
  14. Hendry RF (2010) Ontological reduction and molecular structure. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41(2):183-191. Go to original source...
  15. Heylighen F, Cilliers P, Gershenson C (2007) Complexity and philosophy. In Bogg J, Geyer R, eds., Complexity, Science and Society. Oxford, UK: Radcliffe.
  16. Horrobin DF (2003) Modern biomedical research: an internally self-consistent universe with little contact with medical reality? Nature Review Drug Discovery 2: 151-154. Go to original source...
  17. Kashyap L, Sharma RK (2007) Alternative splicing: a paradoxical qudo in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformation 2(4): 155-156. Go to original source...
  18. Kauffman SA (1993) The Origin of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  19. Keller EF (2000) The Century of the Gene. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
  20. Kim J (1999) Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies 95: 3-36. Go to original source...
  21. Laubichler MD, Wagner GP (2001) How molecular is molecular developmental biology? A reply to Alex Rosenberg's Reductionism Redux: Computing the Embryo. Biology and Philosophy, 16: 53-67. Go to original source...
  22. Maturana H, Varela F, eds. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing Company. Go to original source...
  23. Maturana H., Varela F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA, USA: Shambhala.
  24. Mazzocchi F (2008) Complexity in biology. Exceeding the limits of reductionism and determinism using complexity theory. EMBO reports 9: 10-14. Go to original source...
  25. Mazzocchi F (2010) Complementarity in biology. A reassessment in relation to molecularreductionist and systemic approaches. EMBO reports 11: 339-44. Go to original source...
  26. Mazzocchi F (in preparation) Complexity for systems biology. WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine.
  27. Misteli T (2001) The concept of self-organization in cellular architecture. The Journal of Cell Biology 155: 181-186. Go to original source...
  28. Morange M (2002) The gene between holism and generalism. In van Regenmortel MH, Hull DL, eds., Promises and Limits of Reductionism in the Biomedical Sciences, pp.179- 189. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Go to original source...
  29. Morange M (2006) Post-genomics, between reduction and emergence. Synthese 151: 355-360. Go to original source...
  30. Morin E (2007) Restricted complexity, general complexity. In Gershenson C, Aerts D, Edmonds B eds., Worldviews, Science and Us: Philosophy and Complexity, pp.5-29. Singapore: World Scientific. Go to original source...
  31. Nagel E (1961) The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York, NY, USA: Harcourt, Brace and World.
  32. O'Malley MA, Dupré J (2005) Fundamental issues in systems biology, Bioessays 27: 1270-1276. Go to original source...
  33. Peacocke AR (1985) Reductionism in Academic Disciplines. Guildford, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & NFER-Nelson.
  34. Piaget J (1967) Biologie et connaissance. Paris, France: Gallimard. Phelan, SA (2001) What Is Complexity Science, Really? Emergence 3(1):120-36. Go to original source...
  35. Powell A, Dupré J (2009) From molecules to systems: the importance of looking both ways. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40: 55-64. Go to original source...
  36. Prigogine I, Stengers I (1979) La Nouvelle Alliance. Paris, France: Gallimard.
  37. Rosenberg A (1997) Reductionism redux: computing the embryo. Biology and Philosophy 12(4): 445-470. Go to original source...
  38. Schaffner KF (2002) Reductionism, complexity and molecular medicine: genetic chips and the ‗globalization' of the genome. In Regenmortel M, Hull D, eds., Promises and Limits of Reductionism in the Biomedical Sciences, pp.323-351. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Go to original source...
  39. Singer W (2007) Understanding the brain. EMBO reports 8: S16-S19. Go to original source...
  40. Soto A M, Sonnenschein C (2004) Emergentism as a default: Cancer as a problem of tissue organization. Journal of Bioscience 30 101-116. Go to original source...
  41. Stengers I (1985). Genealogies de l'auto-organisation. Cahiers du CREA, 8, 7-104.
  42. Strohman RC (1997) The coming Kuhnian revolution in biology. Nature Biotechnology 15: 194-200. Go to original source...
  43. Taylor MC (2001) The moment of complexity. Emerging network culture. Chicago, IL, USA. University of Chicago Press.
  44. Varela FJ (1984) The creative circle: sketches on the natural history of circularity. In Watzlavick P, ed. The Invented Reality, pp. 309-323. New York, NY, USA: Norton Publishing.