Abstract
Much of the scholarship on Kant’s theory of concept formation has focused on the question of whether his theory suffers from circularity, i. e., whether it presupposes the very concepts whose origin it should explain. In this article, I defend Kant against a well-known objection raised by Hannah Ginsborg. Ginsborg, I argue, overlooks the relatively narrow aim of Kant’s theory of concept formation. Kant explicitly frames it as an account of a concept’s inherent generality, or form. However, Ginsborg’s objection is not about a concept’s form; it concerns the concept’s content. Moreover, Kant addresses the issue that she raises in his theory of definitions, which explains how a concept’s content can be revised and perfected. Kant considered all empirical concepts to be incomplete and imprecise. For this reason, he denied that they can be properly defined. Kant also did not regard the content of empirical concepts as fixed or permanent. Indeed, he expected that we would continually expand and revise their content on the basis of experience. I argue that these facts, along with the narrow scope of Kant’s theory of concept formation, effectively defuse Ginsborg’s objection.
Allison, H. E. 2001. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511612671Search in Google Scholar
–. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: Revised and Enlarged Edition. New Haven.Search in Google Scholar
Altmann, S. 2015. “Note on the Matter and Content of Concepts”. In Kant’s Lectures/Kants Vorlesungen. Ed. B. Dörflinger/C. La Rocca/R. Louden/U. Marques. Berlin.10.1515/9783110351538-006Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, R. L. 2015. The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724575.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Beck, L. W. 2002. “Kant’s Theory of Definition”. In Selected Essays on Kant. Ed. H. Robinson. Rochester.Search in Google Scholar
Conrad, E. 1994. Kants Logikvorlesungen als neuer Schlüssel zur Architektonik der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Search in Google Scholar
Boswell, T. 1988. “On the Textual Authenticity of Kant’s Logic”. History and Philosophy of Logic 9, 193–203.10.1080/014453408808837133Search in Google Scholar
Dunlop, K. 2012. “Kant and Strawson on the Content of Geometrical Concepts”. Noûs 46, 86–126.10.1111/j.1468-0068.2011.00827.xSearch in Google Scholar
Forster, M. 2012. “Kant’s Philosophy of Language?” Tijdschrift voor Filosophie 74, 485–511.Search in Google Scholar
Ginsborg, H. 2006. “Thinking the Particular as Contained under the Universal”. In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Ed. R. Kukla. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511498220.002Search in Google Scholar
–. 2015. “Lawfulness without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding”. In The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Hinske, N. 1987. Kant-Index. Bd. 2: Stellenindex und Konkordanz zu “Immanuel Kant’s Logik” (Jäsche-Logik). Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1991. Kant-Index. Bd. 14: Personenindex zum Logikcorpus. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.Search in Google Scholar
Heis, J. 2014. “Kant (vs. Leibniz, Wolff and Lambert) on Real Definitions in Geometry”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44, 605–30.10.1080/00455091.2014.971689Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1902–. Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1992a. Dohna-Wundlacken Logic. In Lectures on Logic. Trans. J. M. Young. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1992b. Jäsche Logic. In Lectures on Logic. Trans. J. M. Young. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1992c. Vienna Logic. In Lectures on Logic. Trans. J. M. Young. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998a. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998b. Logik Bauch. In Logik-Vorlesung, Unveröffentlichte Nachschriften. Ed. T. Pinder. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998c. Logik Heschel. In Logik-Vorlesung, Unveröffentlichte Nachschriften. Ed. T. Pinder. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998d. Warschauer Logik. In Logik-Vorlesung, Unveröffentlichte Nachschriften. Ed. T. Pinder. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000a. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. P. Guyer/E. Matthews. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000b. “First Introduction to the Critique of the Power of Judgment.” In Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. P. Guyer/E. Matthews. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2002. Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morality in Theoretical Philosophy. In Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770. Trans. D. Walford. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2006. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Trans. R. B. Louden. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Kowalewski, A. 1924. Die philosophischen Hauptvorlesungen Immanuel Kants. Nach den neu aufgefundenen Kollegheften des Grafen Heinrich zu Dohna-Wundlacken. München.Search in Google Scholar
Kuehn, M. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781107050433Search in Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1989a. “From the Letters to Arnauld (1686–87)”. In Philosophical Essays. Trans. R. Ariew/D. Garber. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1989b. “Meditations on Knowledge, Truth, and Ideas”. In Philosophical Essays. Trans. R. Ariew/D. Garber. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, G. 1966. “Einleitung”. In Gesammelte Schriften (IV. Abt. Bd. XXIV). Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. C. T. Wolfe. Princeton.10.1515/9780691214122Search in Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, H. 2018. Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction. Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780190907136.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
McAndrew, M. 2021. “Three Kantian Accounts of Concept Formation”. Kant-Studien 112, 159–94.10.1515/kant-2021-0019Search in Google Scholar
Meier, G. F. 1752a. Auszug aus der Vernunflehre. Halle.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1752b. Vernunftlehre. Halle.Search in Google Scholar
Nunez, T. 2014. “Definitions of Kant’s Categories”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44, 613–57.10.1080/00455091.2014.974469Search in Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. 1936. Kant’s Metaphysic of Experience. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. 1982. Kant’s Theory of Form: An Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. New Haven.Search in Google Scholar
Pinder, T. 1987. “Zu Kants Logik-Vorlesungen um 1780, anläßlich einer neu aufgefundenen Nachschrift”. In Neue Autographen und Dokumente zu Kants Leben, Schriften und Vorlesungen. Ed. R. Brandt/W. Stark. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000. “Zur Edition der neuen Logik-Nachschrift”. Kant-Studien 91, Sonderheft, 172–77.Search in Google Scholar
Prien, B. 2006. Kants Logik der Begriffe. Berlin.10.1515/9783110893922Search in Google Scholar
Schlapp, O. 1901. Kants Lehre vom Genie und die Entstehung der Kritik der Urtheilskraft. Göttingen.Search in Google Scholar
Schulthess, P. 1981. Relation und Funktion. Eine systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Stark, W. 1987. “Neue Kant-Logiken. Zu gedruckten und ungedruckten Kollegheften nach Kants Vorlesungen über die Logik”. In Neue Autographen und Dokumente zu Kants Leben, Schriften und Vorlesungen. Ed. Brandt/W. Stark. Hamburg.Search in Google Scholar
Stuhlmann-Laeisz, R. 1976, Kants Logik. Eine Interpretation auf der Grundlage der Vorlesungen. Berlin.10.1515/9783110862058Search in Google Scholar
Vanzo, A. 2010, “Kant on the Nominal Definition of Truth”. Kant-Studien 101, 147–66.10.1515/kant.2010.011Search in Google Scholar
Vázquez Lobeiras, M. J. 1998. Die Logik und ihr Spiegelbild. Das Verhältnis von formaler und transzendentaler Logik in Kants philosophischer Entwicklung. Frankfurt/M.Search in Google Scholar
von Wolff-Metternich, B. 1995. Die Überwindung des mathematischen Erkenntnisideals. Kants Grenzbestimmung von Mathematik und Philosophie. Berlin.10.1515/9783110874495Search in Google Scholar
Wolff, C. 1978. Vernünftige Gedanken von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkänntnis der Wahrheit. Hildesheim.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1983a. Philosophia rationalis sive logica. Hildesheim.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1983b. Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Hildesheim.Search in Google Scholar
Young, J. M. 1992. “Translator’s Introduction.” In Lectures on Logic. Ed. J. M. Young. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
