Skip to main content
Log in

Global Labor and Worksite Standards: A Strategic Ethical Analysis of Shareholder Employee Relations Resolutions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze from a strategic ethical perspective four selected shareholder resolutions reported by the Social Issues Service of the Investor Responsibility Research Center regarding international labor and workplace standards. Particular attention will be paid to specific employee relations issues at the operating and tactical level of individual multinational firms. The paper concludes with policy recommendations for proxy statements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davidson, W. N., D. L. Worrell and A. El-Jelly: 1995, 'Influencing Managers to Change Unpopular Behavior Through Boycotts and Divestitures', Business & Society 34, 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSimone, P.: 1996, 'IRRC, Social Issues Service, 1996 Company Report-J, Review of International Workplace Standards', Investor Responsibility Research Center, March 29, 1996, 1–6.

  • DeSimone, P.: 1997, 'IRRC, Social Issues Service, 1997 Company Report-J, International Labor Standards', Investor Responsibility Research Center, May 15, 1997, 1–10.

  • Dobson, J.: 1992, 'Ethics in the Transnational Corporation: The Moral Buck Stops Where?' Journal of Business Ethics 11, 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J., R.A. McEwen and R.M. Spindle: 1994, 'Shareholder Preferences Concerning Corporate Ethical Performance', Journal of Business Ethics 13, 447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Catholic: 1998, '60 Minutes Profiles Two Women Religious Who Battle Corporations', November 19, 1998, p. A10.

  • Guerard, J. B.: 1997, 'Additional Evidence on the Global Labor and Worksite Standards 109 Cost of Being Socially Responsible in Investing', The Journal of Investing, 31–35.

  • Hamilton, S., H. J. Statman and M. Statman: 1993, 'Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds', Financial Analysts Journal, 62–66.

  • Hopkins, J.: 1992, 'Money Managers No Longer Blind to Social Investments', Pension World, 10–13.

  • Hutton, R. B., L. D'Antonio and T. Johnson: 1998, 'Socially Responsible Investing: Growing Issues and New Opportunities', Business & Society 37, 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, P. D.: 1992, 'Socially-Responsible Investors Face Overseas Challenges', Pension World, 18–20.

  • Kinder, P. D.: 1993, 'Social Investing's Strength Lies in Readiness to Deal With World's Tough Questions', Pension World, 10–12.

  • Kurtz, L.: 1997, 'No Effect, or No Net Effect? Studies on Socially Responsibility Investing', The Journal of Investing, 37–49.

  • Pava, M. L. and J. Krausz: 1996, 'The Association Between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 321–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, F. J.: 1997, 'Socially Responsible Investing on a Global Basis: Mixing Money and Morality Outside the US', The Journal of Investing, 50–56.

  • Varley, P.: 1997, 'IRRC, Social Issues Service, 1997 Company Report-J, International Labor Standards', Investor Responsibility Research Center, May 1, 1997, 1–9.

  • Verschoor, C. C.: 1998, 'A Study of the Link Between a Corporation's Financial Performance and Its Commitment to Ethics', Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1509–1516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, H.: 1996, 'IRRC, Social Issues Service, 1996 Company Report-J, Global Labor Standards', Investor Responsibility Research Center, March 29, 1996, 1–8.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCabe, D.M. Global Labor and Worksite Standards: A Strategic Ethical Analysis of Shareholder Employee Relations Resolutions. Journal of Business Ethics 23, 101–110 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006231229696

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006231229696

Navigation