Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The International Library of Bioethics ((ILB,volume 84))

Abstract

Phenomenology has a rich tradition of interpreting technology, medicine, and the life sciences. It has not yet had much to say about the medical devices which have always been central to bioethics. In this chapter, I outline what is meant by medical devices, and connect the sense of intention in made-object design with the notion of intentionality in phenomenology. I survey three basic ways of characterising medical devices grounded in the phenomenological literature: Albert Borgmann’s device paradigm, Don Ihde’s human-machine relations, and Merleau-Ponty’s body-subject. Engaging with these approaches could help bring to analyses of medical devices the uniquely whole-of-context view of which phenomenology is capable, and better inform all stakeholders about their phenomenal consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Saji, A. 2008. “A past which has never been present”: Bergsonian dimensions in Merleau-Ponty’s theory of the prepersonal. Research in Phenomenology 38 (1): 41–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C. 1977. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 44 (4): 542–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, A. 1984. Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carel, H. 2016. Phenomenology of illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. 2009. On the Internet (Thinking in action), 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H.L. 2014. From Socrates to expert systems: The limits of calculative rationality. In Skillful coping: Essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action, ed. M.A. Hunt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, J. 2016. A critical overview of biological functions. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halben, R. 2017. Heart 2 heart: Stories from patients with left ventricular assist devices. Michigan: Michigan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. 2011. The question concerning technology. In Basic writings: From being and time (1927) to the task of thinking (1964), ed. D.F. Krell. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houkes, W., and P.E. Vermaas. 2010. Technical functions: On the use and design of artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. 1975. The experience of technology: Human-machine relations. Cultural Hermeneutics 2 (3): 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leder, D. 1990. The absent body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, B., M. Michael, and G.V. Gonzalez-Stawinski. 2015. Ventricular assist devices: The future is now. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 25 (4): 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. Faith and good faith. In Sense and non-sense, 9–25. Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 2012. Phenomenology of perception, trans. D.A. Landes. Abingdon: Routledge (Original work published in 1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkowski, E. 1970. Lived time: Phenomenological and psychopathological studies, trans. N. Metzel. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. 2002. L’Intrus, trans. S. Hanson. CR: The New Centennial Review 2 (3): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J.M. 2020. “What if there’s something wrong with her?”—How biomedical technologies contribute to epistemic injustice in healthcare. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 58 (1): 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.A. 2016. Experiencing phenomenology: An introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, V. 2005. “Choreography for one, two, and three legs” (A phenomenological meditation in movements). Topoi 24 (1): 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therapeutic Goods Act. 1989. Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todes, S. 2001. Body and world. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toombs, S.K. 2001. Reflections on bodily change: The lived experience of disability. In Handbook of phenomenology and medicine, ed. S.K. Toombs, vol. 68, 247–261. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambrano, M. 2018. The metaphor of the heart, trans. J. Kraniauskas. History of European Ideas 44 (7): 987–994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pat McConville .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McConville, P. (2021). Phenomenology and Medical Devices. In: Ferrarello, S. (eds) Phenomenology of Bioethics: Technoethics and Lived-Experience. The International Library of Bioethics, vol 84. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65613-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics