Skip to main content
Log in

Screening-off and The Levels of Selection

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In ‘The Levels of Selection’ (Brandon, 1984), Robert Brandon provides a suggestive but ultimately unsuccessful attempt to use the probabilistic notion ofscreening off in providing a schema for dealing with an aspect of the “units of selection” question in the philosophy of biology. I characterize that failure, and suggest a revision and expansion of Brandon's account which addresses its key shortcoming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brandon, R.: 1984, ‘The Levels of Selection’, in Robert Brandon and Robert Burian (eds.),Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies Over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.: 1991,Microcognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClamrock, R.: 1991, ‘Methodological Individualism Considered as a Constitutive Principle of Scientific Inquiry’,Philosophical Psychology 3, 343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClamrock, R.: 1994,Existential Cognition: Computational Minds in the World, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W.: 1984,Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984, ‘Holism, Individualism, and the Units of Selection’, in E. Sober (ed.),Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 184–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McClamrock, R. Screening-off and The Levels of Selection. Erkenntnis 42, 107–112 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01666814

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01666814

Keywords

Navigation