Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soviets vs.Soviet Scholasticism

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Studies in Soviet thought Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. M. Bocheński, ‘Thomism and Marxism-Leninism’,SST, 1967, 7, 166.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A Dictionary of Philosophy [Filosofskij Slovar' Na anglijskom jazyke], Moscow, 1967, pp. 54–55, 480.

  3. N. A. Kiseleva, ‘Sxolastika i dialektičeskij Materializm’,V MGU, 1969, 1, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. E. Byxovskij, ‘Sxolastičeskij bumerang’,Kommunist 1963, 2, 104.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. J. Blakeley,Soviet Scholasticism, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1961;Soviet Philosophy. A General Introduction to Contemporary Soviet Thought, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1964;Soviet Theory of Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1964.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiseleva, p. 55.

  7. Ibid.

  8. Ibid., p. 53.

  9. Blakeley,Soviet Theory of Knowledge, pp. 18–27.

  10. Kiseleva, p. 55.

  11. Kiseleva, p. 47.

  12. Ibid., p. 48.

  13. Ibid., p. 49.

  14. Ibid., pp. 48–49, 50.

  15. Ibid., p. 53.

  16. Ibid., p. 49.

  17. Ibid., pp. 49–50.

  18. Ibid., pp. 50–51.

  19. Ibid., p. 52.

  20. Blakeley,Soviet Scholasticism, p. 46.

  21. Ibid., p. 51.

  22. Ibid., p. 54.

  23. Ibid., pp. 49–54.

  24. Kiseleva, p. 52.

  25. Blakeley,Soviet Scholasticism, p. vii.

  26. Kiseleva, p. 54.

  27. “An examination of the works of these anti-Marxists is a proof that as a rule they do not criticize Marxism; they criticize the caricature of Marxism they themselves have created. ... I would like to strongly advise that the best way of learning the thrugh (sic!) is learning it from Marxists themselves and not from professional anti-Marxists.” V. V. Mšvenieradze, “Ideology and Philosophy”,Akten des XIV. Internationalen Kongresses für Philosophie, vol. I, p. 411.

  28. Kiseleva, pp. 46–47.

  29. Bocheński, p. 166.

  30. Ibid., p. 163.

  31. J. M. Bocheński, ‘On Philosophical Dialogue’,SST 1966, 6, 243–44.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kiseleva, p. 49.

  33. Ibid., p. 50.

  34. Ibid., p. 54.

  35. Blakeley,Soviet Theory of Knowledge, p. 142.

  36. Kiseleva, p. 54.

  37. “That there remains a serious question on the relations between the objects of these philosophical sciences [logic, epistemology, ontology], no one will care to deny.” Blakeley,Soviet Theory of Knowledge, p. 143.

  38. Kiseleva, p. 51.

  39. Ibid., p. 55.

  40. Ibid., p. 46.

  41. Bocheński, ‘Thomism and Marxism-Leninism’, p. 166.

  42. Kiseleva, pp. 46, 53.

Download references

Authors
  1. D. J. McCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarthy, D.J. Soviets vs.Soviet Scholasticism . Studies in Soviet Thought 10, 41–49 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027807

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02027807

Keywords

Search

Navigation