Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare are Rights

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I defend a theory of welfare rights for nonhuman animals. I do this by demonstrating that a well-established framework for protecting the interests of farm animals, the ‘Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare’, is already functioning just as a set of rights. To support this claim I adopt a common approach to detecting evidence for deontological reasoning and look at the structural features of rights. I first consider Hohfeld’s system of legal rights and consider whether the Five Freedoms may be understood as liberties or claim rights, before making a more successful comparison with side constraints and an interest theory of rights as understood by Nozick and Raz. I also respond to a likely objection that it is not possible to have some welfare rights without a right to freedom from exploitation. The argument therefore contributes to breaking down the stubborn division between ‘animal welfare’ and ‘animal rights’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, L. (2000). Deontology at the threshold. San Diego Law Review, 35, 893–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, D. (2009). The use and misuse of ‘rights talk’ by the animal rights movement. In P. Sankoff & S. White (Eds.), Animal law in Australasia: A new dialogue (pp. 128–152). Leichhardt: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke, D. (1970). Abstracts of comments. Noûs, 4(1), 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri, P., & Singer, P. (Eds.). (1993). The great ape project. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, A. (2009a). Do animals have an interest in liberty? Political Studies, 57(3), 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, A. (2009b). Ownership and justice for animals. Utilitas, 21(4), 424–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farm Animal Welfare Council. (2012). FAWC updates the five freedoms. Veterinary Record, 131, 357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Five Basic Animal Rights. (2010). http://www.theinfomine.com/2010/07/12/five-basic-animal-rights/. Accessed 27 July 2013.

  • Francione, G. L. (1996). Rain without thunder: The ideology of the animal rights movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francione, G. L., & Garner, R. (2010). The animal rights debate. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (2004). Animals, politics and morality (2nd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (2013). A theory of justice for animals: Animal rights in a nonideal world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (2008). On human rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2013). Animal machines: The new factory farming industry. Wallingford: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1982). Essays on Bentham: Studies in jurisprudence and political theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (1994). Rights. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. ([1785] 2008). Groundwork for the metaphysic of morals. In: Bennett, J. Early modern texts (Trans. & Ed.). http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdf/kantgrou.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2013.

  • Keown, D. (1995). Are there human rights in Buddhism? Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 2, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D. (1970). The correlativity of rights and duties. Noûs, 4(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, S. P. (2012a). A critique of FAWC’s five freedoms as a framework for the analysis of animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(5), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, S. P. (2012b). On the virtue of solidarity: Animal rights, animal welfarism and animals’ rights to wellbeing. Journal of Animal Welfare Law Spring/Summer, 201, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice, revised edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Raz, J. (1984). On the nature of rights. Mind, 93, 194–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Australia. (2013). RSPCA policies. http://kb.rspca.org.au/Five-freedoms-for-animals_318.html. Accessed 3 May 2013.

  • Royes, L. (2010). Cruelty cases win legal aid. City News. http://city-news.whereilive.com.au/news/story/cruelty-cases-win-legal-aid/. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Sankoff, P. (2009). The welfare paradigm: Making the world a better place for animals? In P. Sankoff & S. White (Eds.), Animal law in Australasia: A new dialogue (pp. 7–34). Leichhardt: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (2006). Animal rights and wrongs. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. G. (1970). Abstracts of comments. Noûs, 4(1), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J. (1989). Rights in conflict. Ethics, 99(3), 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S. (1997). Thunder without rain: A review/commentary of Gary L Francione’s Rain without thunder: The ideology of the animal rights movement. Animal Law, 3, 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Society for the Protection of Animals. (2009). http://www.wspa.org.au/publicfiles/Policy04.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2009.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Neil Levy, Felix Gedye, Alasdair Cochrane, Tatjana Višak and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare McCausland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCausland, C. The Five Freedoms of Animal Welfare are Rights. J Agric Environ Ethics 27, 649–662 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9483-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9483-6

Keywords

Navigation