Abstract
Research has consistently shown that bizarre sentences are better remembered than common sentences when bizarreness is manipulated within-subjects, memory is assessed with free recall, and the processing instructions emphasize the use of imagery. Even though previous research conforms remarkably to this pattern, a recent exception to this pattern (Kroll, Schepeler, & Angin, 1986, Experiment 1) suggests that there are additional factors that control bizarre imagery effects. Several methodological factors were experimentally examined to try to identify the reason for the discrepancy between the Kroll et al. findings and the rest of the literature. The results indicated that the complexity of the stimulus materials can eliminate the bizarreness effect. Several explanations for this finding are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Battig, W. F., & Einstein, G. O. (1977). Evidence that broader processing facilitates delayed retention. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 28–30.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Distinctiveness and the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 78-102). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., & Lackey, S. (in press). Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Hirshman, E., & Whelley, M. M. (1988). An investigation of paradoxical memory effects. Unpublished manuscript, New York University, New York, NY.
Klein, K., & Saltz, E. (1976). Specifying the mechanisms in a levels of-processing approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 671–679.
Kroll, N. E. A., Schepeler, E. M., & Angin, K. T. (1986). Bizarre imagery: The misremembered mnemonic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 42–53.
Kroll, N. E. A., & Tu, S.-F. (1988). The bizarre mnemonic. Psychological Research, 50, 28–37.
Mcdaniel, M. A., Anderson, D. C., Einstein, G. O., & O’Halloran, C. (in press). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies. American Journal of Psychology.
Mcdaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 54–65.
Merry, R. (1980). Image bizarreness in incidental learning. Psychological Reports, 46, 427–430.
Stein, B. S., Littlefield, J., Bransford, J. D., & Persampieri, M. (1984). Elaboration and knowledge acquisition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 522–529.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant HD23984. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Melanie Weeks and Thomas Chervenak, for testing subjects and scoring data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDaniel, M.A., Einstein, G.O. Sentence complexity eliminates the mnemonic advantage of bizarre imagery. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 27, 117–120 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329915
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329915