Skip to main content
Log in

Issues in common law pleading and ancient rhetoric

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concepts of issue and status are more different than is currently assumed. Apart from differences between the classifications of statements they are related to, there are differences between their definitions. The respective functions of pleadings and of inventio account for most of these differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Ad Herennium: 1981, H. Caplan (trans.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  • Aristotle: 1967, Rhétorique, M. Dufour (ed.), Belles Lettres, Paris.

  • Bacon, M.: 1832, A New Abridgment of the Law, 7th ed., A. Straham, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.H.: 1978, The Reports of Sir John Spelman, Selden Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J.H.: 1979, An Introduction to English Legal History, 2nd ed., Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumanoir, P. de: 1974, Courumes de Clermont en Beauvaisis, A. Picard, Paris, I, 1970, II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackstone, W.: 1809, Commentaries on the Laws of England, 15th ed., London.

  • Bracton: 1968, De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae, S.E. Thorne (trans.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., I-II, 1977 III–IV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braet, A.: 1987, ‘The Classical Doctrine of Status and the Rhetorical Theory of Argumentation’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 20(2), 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullen and Leake's Precedents of Pleading: 1975, I.H. Jacob (ed.), 12th ed., Sweet and Maxwell, London.

  • Chitty, J.: 1840, A Treatise on the Parties to Actions and on Pleading, 8th American ed., Springfield, Mass.

  • Cicero: 1949, Pour C. Rabinus Postumus; Pour T. Annius Milon, Boulanger (trans.), Belles Lettres, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero: 1960, Divisions oratoires, Topiques, H. Bornecque (trans.), Belles Lettres, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero: 1973, Pour P. Quinctius; Pour Sex. Roscius d'Amérie; Pour Q. Roscius le comédien, H. de La Ville de Mirmont (trans.), Belles Lettres, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero: 1976, De Inventione, De Optimo Genere Oratorum, Topica, H.M. Hubbell (trans.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coke, E.: 1832, First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England; or A Commentary upon Littleton, 19th ed., London.

  • Comyns, J.: 1792, Digest of the Laws of England, 3rd ed., London.

  • Cousin, J.: 1935, Etudes sur Quintilien, Boivin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, R.: 1961, ‘Le fait et le droit dans la procédure classique romaine’, in Le fait et le droit, Travaux du Centre National de Recherches Logiques, E. Bruylant, Bruxelles.

  • Elyot, T.: 1883, The Boke named The Governour, London.

  • Finch, H.: 1627, Law, or a Discourse thereof, London.

  • Giffard, A.: 1972, Etudes du droit romain, Cujas, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, F.: 1924, Manuel élémentaire de droit romain, Rousseau, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenidge, A.H.J.: 1901, The Legal Proceedings of Cicero's Time, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, A.: 1962, ‘The Influence of Rhetoric on the Law of Evidence and pleading’, The Juridical Review vii, 216–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, M.: 1739, The Analysis of the Law, London.

  • Kennedy, G.: 1972, The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gras, B.: 1671, La rhétorique française, Paris.

  • Lempereur, A.: 1990, ‘Problématologie du droit’, in Lempereur, A. (ed.), L'homme et la rhétorique, Méridiens-Klincksieck, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, S.T.: 1988, ‘La théorie des états de cause: l'argumentation défensive’, Poétique 74, 183–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, S.T.: 1989, L'invention défensive: essai sur le rôle d'une topique dans l'interprétation des énoncés, Thése de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris.

  • Nadeau, R.: 1959, ‘The Classical System of stases in Greek: Hermagoras to Hermogenes’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 2, 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odger's Principles of Pleading and Practice in Civil Actions: 1960, 17th ed., B.A. Harwood and G.F. Harwood (eds.), Stevens and Sons, London.

  • Patillon, M.: 1988, La théorie du discours chez Hermogéne le rhéteur, Belles Lettres, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Placita Corone, or La Corone Pledee devant Justices: 1966, Selden Society, London.

  • Pollock, F. and Maitland, F.: 1895, The History of the Law before the Time of Edward I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintilian: 1976, Institutio Oratoria, H.E. Butler (trans.)Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E.: 1908, The Reports, The English Reports, LXXXV, King's Bench Division, XIV, London.

  • Schultz, F.: 1946, History of Roman Legal Science, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, H.J.: 1838, A Treatise on the Principles of Pleading in Civil Actions, 4th ed., London.

  • Wenger, L.: 1940, Institutes of the Roman Law of Civil Procedure, New York.

  • Wilson, T.: 1909, The Arte of Rhetorique, G.H. Mair (ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McEvoy, S.T. Issues in common law pleading and ancient rhetoric. Argumentation 5, 245–261 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128809

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128809

Key words

Navigation