Skip to main content
Log in

The engineer’s moral right to reputational fairness

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay explores the issue of the moral rights of engineers. An historical case study is presented in which an accomplished, loyal, senior engineer was apparently wronged as a result of actions taken by his employer in pursuit of legitimate business interests. Belief that the engineer was wronged is justified by showing that what happened to him violated what can validly be termed one of his moral rights as an engineer: the right to reputational fairness. It is then argued that, this right notwithstanding, under certain circumstances it is morally permissible for employers to override it. The paper concludes by identifying two complementary facets of this right, discussing its scope, and indicating what is required of employers obliged to respect it in two types of action contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes and references

  1. Keller A C (1986)Reflections of a Stereo Pioneer. San Francisco Press, San Francisco, chapters 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. New York Times, June 14, 1958, p. 27.

  3. Complaint, Civil Action No. 134–299, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, June 13, 1958, p. 2.

  4. Keller, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Complaint, p. 7.

  7. Ibid., p. 8.

  8. Ibid.

  9. Ibid., p. 13.

  10. Keller A C (1952) A New General Purpose Relay for Telephone Switching Systems.Bell System Technical Journal 31: 1023–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Complaint, p. 16.

  12. Ibid., p. 63.

  13. Ibid., pp. 16 and 67.

  14. Keller,Reflections, pp. 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keller,Ibid., p. 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brooks J (1976)Telephone: The First Hundred Years. Harper and Row, New York, 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., pp. 252–253.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  21. New York Times, January 25, 1956, pp. 1 and 16.

  22. New York Times, March 28, 1958, p. 15.

  23. New York Times, March 26, 1958, p. 19, March 28, 1958, p. 15, and May 26, 1959, pp. 1 and 18.

  24. New York Times, May 22, 1958, p. 20.

  25. Keller,Reflections, p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., pp. 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Feinberg J (1973)Social Philosophy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  30. For discussion of this issue, see Cranston M (1983) Are There Any Human Rights?Daedalus 112: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Keller,Reflections, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  32. For this tri-partite distinction see Feinberg,op. cit., pp. 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brittain J C (1970) The Introduction of the Loading Coil: George A. Campbell and Michael I. Pupin.Technology and Culture 11: 36–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid. p. 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ibid. p. 55, footnote 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., p. 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Keller,Reflections, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  38. I owe this example to Deborah G. Johnson.

  39. I owe this idea to Stephanie J. Bird.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Professor of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management and, by courtesy, of Civil Engineering, and in the Program in Science, Technology, and Society, School of Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 94305-2120.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGinn, R.E. The engineer’s moral right to reputational fairness. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 217–230 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628799

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628799

Keywords

Navigation