Abstract
Human Ss were asked to heft a 150-g weight and were required to identify it in a test series of weights, ranging in value from 100 to 200 g, with 25-g steps. Following each test response, each S was asked to rate the weight he had just lifted on a 7-point scale of heaviness, with 1 being very light, 4 neither light nor heavy, and 7 being very heavy. Results showed that Ss chose the stimulus weight closest to adaptation level (125 g) as the original training stimulus more often than the 150-g weight itself. Support was noted for adaptation-level theory. Further, analysis of rating data yielded information as to why Ss rejected a given stimulus as not the original. Three gradients of response, “too light,” “same,” and “too heavy,” were drawn, showing this voluntary generalization task to be a three-category judgment process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Capehart, J., Tempone, V. J., & Hebert, J. A theory of stimulus equivalence. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 405–418.
Hebert, J. A., & Capehart, J. E. Generalization of a voluntary response as a function of presentation frequency of the training stimulus in testing. Psychonomic Science, 1969, 16, 315–316.
Helson, H. Adaptation level as a frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data. American Journal of Psychology, 1947, 60, 1–29.
McGuirk, F. D. Latency patterns in category judgments. Unpublished MS thesis, Colorado State University, 1971.
Thomas, D. R., & Jones, C. G. Stimulus generalization as a function of the frame of reference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962, 64, 77–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors thank Henry Cross for his reading of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGuirk, F.D., Hebert, J.A. Voluntary stimulus generalization as a three-category judgment process. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 1, 53–55 (1973). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333338
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333338