Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complexity and social scientific laws

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bernstein, Richard: 1976,The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, May: 1962, ‘On the Philosophy of the Social Sciences’, in E. C. Harwood (ed.),Reconstruction of Economics, 3rd ed., American Institute for Economic Research, Great Barrington, pp. 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Morris: 1959,Reason and Nature: An Essay on the Meaning of Scientific Method, The Free Press, Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Donald: 1980,Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, Brian: 1983, ‘General Laws and Explaining Human Behavior’, in D. Sabia Jr. and J. Wallulis (eds.),Changing Social Science, SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 103–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Nelson: 1955,Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, Rollo: 1964,Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences: Problems and Controversies, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A.: 1967, ‘The Theory of Complex Phenomena’,Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A.: 1979,The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, 2nd ed., The Free Press, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1965,Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, Harold: 1988, ‘Confirmation, Complexity and Social Laws’, in A. Fine and J. Leplin (eds.),PSA, 1988, Volume Two, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 299–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, Harold: 1990, ‘Defending Laws in the Social Sciences’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20, 56–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, Lee: 1991, ‘Problems in the Philosophy of Social Science: Towards a Defense of Nomological Explanation in the Social Sciences’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Nagel, Ernest: 1961,The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl: 1961,The Poverty of Historicism, Harper Torchbooks, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl: 1965, ‘Prediction and Prophecy in the Social Sciences’, in K. Popper (ed.),Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Harper Torchbooks, New York, pp. 336–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1980,Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1985,The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1988,Philosophy of Social Science, Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Merrilee: 1989, ‘Explanation in the Social Sciences’, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds.),Scientific Explanation: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 384–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, Michael: 1956, ‘A Possible Distinction Between Traditional Scientific Disciplines and the Study of Human Behavior’,The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 1, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 330–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, Michael: 1959a, ‘Explanation and Prediction in Evolutionary Theory’,Science 130, 477–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, Michael: 1959b, ‘Truisms as the Grounds for Historical Explanations’, in P. Gardiner (ed.),Theories of History, The Free Press, Glencoe, pp. 443–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, Michael: 1964, ‘Views of Human Nature’, in T. Wann (ed.),Behaviorism and Phenomenology: Contrasting Bases for Modern Psychology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 163–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, Michael: 1969, ‘Explanation in the Biological Sciences’,Journal of the History of Biology 2, 187–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Mary: 1970, ‘Deducing the Consequences of Evolution: A Mathematical Model’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 29, 343–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Mary: 1973, ‘Falsifiable Predictions of Evolutionary Theory’,Philosophy of Science 40, 518–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Mary: 1980, ‘Similarities and Differences between Evolutionary Theory and the Theories of Physics’, in P. Asquith and R. Giere (eds.),PSA, 1980, Volume Two, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp. 385–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, Barbara: 1950,Testament for Social Science: An Essay in the Application of Scientific Method to Human Problems, W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy and Religion, Colgate University, 13346, Hamilton, NY, USA

    Lee C. McIntyre

Authors
  1. Lee C. McIntyre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McIntyre, L.C. Complexity and social scientific laws. Synthese 97, 209–227 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064115

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064115

Search

Navigation