Abstract
For over 70 years, research has tackled the issue of academic misconduct in the university setting. However, a review of the literature reveals that (a) consensus on the magnitude of such behavior has not been reached, and, (b) no one with expertise in quantitative methodology has attempted to classify the behaviors that describe cheaters until Ferrell and Daniel proposed the use of the Academic Misconduct Survey (AMS). Even they, following their 1995 study, made a call for the development of understandable constructs in the measurement of cheating. Seventeen years later, the present study sought to produce such constructs. In a series of three phases of data collection, 4,100 participants completed a revised version of the AMS. A factor solution containing five factors proved to be the most interpretable. The five factors are as follows: creative padding, interactive cheating, false personal excuses, taking credit for others’ work, exam cheating. The present paper outlines the constructs proposed and discusses implications in this area for (1) scholars within the area of measurement and (2) educators with regard to student accountability and performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A crisis in America’s schools. 2011. ABC News, April 29. http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=132376&page=1 (accessed March 1st, 2008).
Bruggeman, E. L., & Hart, K. J. (1996). Cheating, lying, and moral reasoning by religious and secular high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(6), 340–344.
Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture: why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead. Orlando: Hartcourt.
Daniel, L. G., Blount, K. D., & Ferrell, C. M. (1991). Academic misconduct among teacher education students: a descriptive correlational study. Research in Higher Education, 32(6), 703–724.
Davis, S., & Ludvigson, H. (1995). Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology, 22(2), 199–222.
Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16–20.
Deshpande, S. P., Joseph, J., & Berry, K. (2012). Ethical misconduct of business students: some new evidence. American Journal of Business Education, 5(6), 719–726.
Diekhoff, G., LaBeff, E., Clark, R., Williams, L., Francis, B., & Haines, V. (1996). College cheating: ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 487–501.
Evans, E. D., & Craig, D. (1990). Adolescent cognitions for academic cheating as a function of grade level and achievement status. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 325–345.
Ferrell, C. M., & Daniel, L. G. (1995). A frame of reference for understanding behaviors related to the academic misconduct of undergraduate teacher education students. Research in Higher Education, 36(3), 345–375.
Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.
Jackson, D. L., Teal, C. R., Raines, S. J., Nansel, T. R., Force, R. C., & Burdsal, C. A. (1999). The dimensions of students’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 580–596.
Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209–228.
Levitt, S. D., & Dunbar, S. J. (2005). Freakanomics: a rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything. New York: Morrow.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 219.
McCollum, K. (1996). August 2. Web site where students share term papers has professors worried about plagiarism. Chronicle of Higher Education, A28.
McKibban, A. (2013). Students’ perceptions of teacher effectiveness and academic misconduct: an inquiry into the multivariate nature of a complex phenomenon. Manuscript in press. Ethics and Behavior.
Moore, M. (1990). Cheating 101. New Brunswick: Author.
Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41, 129–145.
Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students’ judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 765–777.
Olafson, L., Schraw, G., Nadelson, L., Nadelson, S., & Kehrwald, N. (2013). Exploring the judgment-action gap: college students and academic dishonesty. Ethics and Behavior, 23(2), 148–162.
Parr, F. W. (1936). The problem of student honesty. Journal of Higher Education, 7, 318–326.
Pulvers, K., & Diekhoff, G. (1999). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 487–498.
Robinson, E., Amburgey, R., Swank, E., & Faulkner, C. (2004). Test cheating in a rural college: studying the importance of individual and situational factors. College Student Journal, 38, 380–395.
Schuhmann, P., Burrus, R. T., Barber, P. D., Graham, J. E., & Elikai, M. F. (2013). Using the scenario method to analyse cheating behaviors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(1), 17–33.
Staats, S., & Hupp, J. M. (2012). An examination of academic misconduct intentions and the effectiveness of syllabus statements. Ethics and Behavior, 22(4), 239–247.
Sutton, A., Taylor, D., & Johnston, C. (2012). A model for exploring student understandings of plagiarism. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36, 1–18.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
Thompson, B. (1980). Comparison of two strategies for collecting Q-sort data. Psychological Reports 47, 547–551.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Tyre, P. (2007). To catch a cheat: the pressure is on for schools to raise test scores. Some, it seems, are willing to resort to anything. Newsweek, October 9. http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2007/10/09/to-catch-a-cheat.html (accessed March 13, 2008).
Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–271.
Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 16, 293–307.
Williams, S., Tanner, M., Beard, J., & Hale, G. (2012). Academic integrity on college campuses. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 8(1), 9–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
Creative padding: items and pattern loadings | |
Padded a bibliography of a paper with sources which you have not read to make the effort expended seem more intensive | 0.85 |
Made up sources for bibliographic citations in a paper | 0.77 |
Listed articles that were read but were not pertinent to the topic in a paper’s bibliography | 0.67 |
Copied directly large sections of published work for inclusion in a written assignment without giving credit to the author | 0.57 |
Copied a few phrases/sentences from work for inclusion in a written assignment without giving credit to the author | 0.52 |
Based an “article report” on the abstract rather than reading the entire article | 0.44 |
Written fictitious accounts of observation, life experiences, etc., without actually completing the observations or experiences | 0.40 |
Interactive cheating: items and pattern loadings | |
Worked in a group on a homework assignment that was assigned as individual work | 0.68 |
Collaborated with someone on a take home exam that was intended to be an independent activity | 0.64 |
Copied a homework assignment from someone in another section of the class | 0.64 |
Had another student tell you the answers to a test before you had to take it | 0.53 |
Asked another student who has previously taken an exam for the answers prior to taking the test | 0.52 |
Read a condensed version of a novel/play/etc., rather than the full-length version | 0.48 |
Allowed another student to copy from your paper during an exam | 0.41 |
Exam cheating: items and pattern loadings | |
Copied answers from another student during an exam | 0.72 |
Copied from a cheat sheet during a quiz or exam | 0.53 |
Looked at another student’s exam responses and kept your answer if both your answers were the same | 0.53 |
Stored test information in a high memory calculator to use on an in- class exam | 0.46 |
Stored answers to a test using a cell phone, palm pilot, Ipod, etc., and used it on an in-class exam | 0.44 |
Created or made use of a “test file” when the teacher did not permit keeping the copies of the exam | 0.37 |
Text messaged answers to a test back and forth with classmates | 0.32 |
Taking credit for others’ work: items and pattern loadings | |
Had another student write a paper and presented it as your own work | 0.83 |
Had another student complete an assignment (e.g., worksheet, math problems) and presented it as your own work | 0.78 |
Written a research paper for another student | 0.37 |
False personal excuses: items and pattern loadings | |
Delayed taking an exam due to false personal excuses | 0.72 |
Related false personal information (e.g., illness, death in the family) to a professor to delay completing course requirements | 0.70 |
Offered exaggerated accounts of personal problems to a professor in hopes of getting a higher grade in the class | 0.35 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKibban, A.R., Burdsal, C.A. Academic Dishonesty: An In-Depth Investigation of Assessing Measurable Constructs and a Call for Consistency in Scholarship. J Acad Ethics 11, 185–197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9187-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9187-6