Abstract
In response to various difficulties that confront John Hick’s pluralistic hypothesis, Philip Quinn proposes a recipe for developing “more satisfactory” pluralistic hypotheses. In this short exploratory paper I examine Quinn’s proposal, identify some problems that it faces, and consider some alternatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hasker W. (2008) Thinner theologies, religious diversity and religious tolerance. In: Kraft J., Basinger D. (eds) Religious tolerance through Humility: Thinking with Philip Quinn. Ashgate, Aldershot, England, pp 85–97
Hick J. (1989) An Interpretation of religion. Yale University Press, New Haven
Kraft J. (2006) Philip Quinn’s contribution to the epistemic challenge of religious diversity. Religious Studies 42: 453–465
McKim R. (2003) The Goodness of the Real. Sophia 42(2): 172–178
Quinn, P. L. (2000). Towards thinner theologies: Hick and Alston on religious diversity. In: P. L. Quinn, K. Meeker (Eds.), The philosophical challenge of religious diversity (pp. 226–243). New York: Oxford University Press). (Quinn’s paper was originally published in International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38, (December 1995), 145–64.)
Rowe W. L. (1999) Religious pluralism. Religious Studies 35: 139–150
Wainwright W. (2005) Competing religious claims. In: Mann W. E. (Ed.) The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of religion. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 220–241
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKim, R. Cooking with Philip Quinn. Int J Philos Relig 71, 239–245 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9276-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9276-z