Skip to main content
Log in

The goodness of the real

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Eddy, Paul: 2000 “Religious Pluralism and the Divine: Another Look at John Hick’s Neo-Kantian Proposal” inThe Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity edited by Philip Quinn and Kevin Meeker (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 126–138. [1994]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, John: 1989An Interpretation of Religion (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, John: 2000 “Religious Pluralism and Salvation” in Quinn and Meeker, 54–66. [1988]

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavrodes, George: 2000 “Polytheism” in Quinn and Meeker, pp. 139–60. [1995]

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Philip: 2000 “Towards Thinner Theologies: Hick and Alston on Religious Diversity” in Quinn and Meeker,, pp. 226–243. [1995]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert McKim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKim, R. The goodness of the real. SOPHIA 42, 129–134 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782404

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02782404

Keywords

Navigation