Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational Virtue and Stakeholder Interdependence: An Empirical Examination of Financial Intermediaries and IPO Firms

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizational virtue orientation (OVO), an organizational-level construct, refers to the integrated set of beliefs and values that support ethical character traits and virtuous behaviors. To advance the study of organizational virtue, we examine OVO in firms making their initial public offerings (IPOs), with respect to key external stakeholders that serve as financial intermediaries (i.e., venture capital firms and underwriting banks). Drawing on stakeholder and resource dependence theories, we argue that mutual interdependencies occur between financial intermediaries and IPO firms such that venture capital firms’ ownership levels and underwriter reputation are positively associated with the selection of more virtuous IPO firms. We also argue for the moderating relationship of IPO firm age on these main relationships; since IPO firms have more history and information availability, less importance will be placed on OVO in the selection process. In support of our hypotheses, the results of this study suggest the organizational virtue of IPO firms influences the selection decisions of financial intermediaries by reflecting positively on these key stakeholders to improve legitimacy and reputation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 263–295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. G., Moore, C. B., & Al-Shammari, H. A. (2008). Country of origin and foreign IPO legitimacy: Understanding the role of geographic scope and insider ownership. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. G., Moore, C. B., & Filatotchev, I. (2011). Strategic and institutional effects on foreign IPO performance: Examining the impact of country of origin, corporate governance, and host country effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 355–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. (2002). Multilevel random coefficient modeling organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 401–405). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E. H. (1984). Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk. Interfaces, 14(1), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, A., & Gompers, P. (1997). ‘Myth or Reality?’ The long-run underperformance of initial public offerings: Evidence from venture- and nonventure-capital-backed companies. The Journal of Finance, 52(5), 1791–1821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. B., Dark, F. H., & Singh, A. K. (1998). Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 285–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. B., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1045–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. T., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2001). Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(2), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. T., Holcomb, T. R., & Holmes, R. M. (2009). IPO research in management and entrepreneurship: Moving the agenda forward. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1340–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, R. (2005). Ethical character and virtue of organizations: An empirical assessment and strategic implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(3), 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, R. (2009). A corporate’s responsibility to employees during a merger: Organizational virtue and employee loyalty. Corporate Governance, 9(4), 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. (1994). A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory. Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of Toronto.

  • Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (2005). Investment bankers and IPO pricing: Does prospectus information matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., Dalton, D. R., & Roengpitya, R. (2003). IPO underpricing: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R., Certo, S. T., & Daily, C. M. (2003). Initial public offerings as a web of conflicts of interest: An empirical assessment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(3), 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L., Payne, G. T., & McMahan, G. C. (2007). A few bad apples? Scandalous behavior of mutual fund managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNoble, A. E., Ehrlich, S. B., Moore, T., & Weaver, R. R. (1994). After the cash arrives: A comparative study of venture capital and private investor involvement in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organizational studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary-evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 785–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, T. A. (1998). The relationship between boards of directors and initial public offerings in the biotechnology industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22, 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M. (1995). Corporate communications: Comparing executives’ private and public statements. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 522–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., Hatch, M. J., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1998). Organizational culture and identity. What’s the difference anyway? In D. A. Whetten & P. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Developing theory through conversations (pp. 56–59). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, H. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 463–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective in corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, H., Yu, T., & Cannella, A. A. (2016). The use of public language in strategy: A multidisciplinary review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 42(1), 21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Honig, B., Moore, C., Payne, G. T., & Wright, M. (2013). Social capital and entrepreneurship: A schema and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(3), 455–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (1999). The venture capital cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Higgins, M. C. (2003). Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallen, B. L., Katila, R., & Rosenberger, J. D. (2014). How do social defenses work? A resource-dependence lens on technology ventures, venture capital investors, and corporate relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1078–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., Cho, T. S., & Jackson, E. M. (2005). Isomorphism in reverse: Institutional theory as an explanation for recent increases in intraindustry heterogeneity and managerial discretion. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 307–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. L. (1971). Investment banking: Power structure influx. Harvard Business Review, 49(2), 136–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T., & Puri, M. (2002). Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 169–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P. P., & Kaptein, M. (2008). Contracts to communities: A processual model of organizational virtue. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 100–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P. P., Kaptein, M., & van Oosterhout, J. H. (2006). The ethics of the node versus the ethics of the dyad? Reconciling virtue ethics and contractualism. Organization Studies, 27(3), 391–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heugens, P. P., Kaptein, M., & van Oosterhout, J. H. (2008). Contracts to communities: A processual model of organizational virtue. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 100–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (2003). The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks’ entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(3), 466–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (2006). Should we stay or should we go? Accountability, status anxiety, and client defections. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 97–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Roy, A. (2008). Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter? Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 495–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1995). The new issues puzzle. Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (2004). Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management, 33(3), 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, M. L., Jennings, J. E., & Jennings, P. D. (2007). Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1107–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, M. S., Payne, G. T., & Evert, R. E. (2015). Organizational ethics research: A systematic review of methods and analytical techniques. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2436-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A. (1991). Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 46(3), 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalisin, M. D. (2001). Validity of annual report assertions about innovativeness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 53(3), 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1999). Corporate moral agency: Review and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(4), 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2002). On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2005). Corporate character: Modem virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 659–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27(3), 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. B., Bell, R., & Filatotchev, I. (2010). Institutions and foreign IPO firms: The effects of “Home” and “Host” country institutions on performance. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 34(3), 469–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. B., Bell, R., Filatotchev, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2012). Foreign IPO capital market choice: Understanding the institutional fit of corporate governance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 914–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Watling, J. W., & Schindehutte, M. (2000). Venture capitalist involvement in portfolio companies: Insights from South Africa. Journal of Small Business Management, 38(3), 68–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T. W., Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Dual identities in social ventures: An exploratory study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 805–830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. P. (2006). Introduction to the special issue. In search of organizational virtue: Moral agency in organizations. Organization Studies, 27(3), 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & Colle, S. D. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T. (2006). Examining configurations and firm performance in a suboptimal equifinality context. Organization Science, 17(6), 756–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Broberg, J., Moss, T. W., & Short, J. C. (2011). Organizational virtue orientation and family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Bell, R. G., & Zachary, M. (2013). Signaling organizational virtue: An examination of virtue rhetoric, country-level corruption and performance of foreign IPOs from emerging and developed economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(3), 230–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1972). Merger as a response to organizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 382–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 458–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, T. G., Chen, G., Jackson, E. M., & Hambrick, D. C. (2010). How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, T. G., Porac, J. F., & Wade, J. B. (2004). Constructing deal networks: Brokers as network “architects” in the U.S. IPO market and other examples. Academy of Management Review, 29(1), 50–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry : 1894–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, S. M., & Van de Ven, A. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. R. (1991). The long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T. I., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, H. J., & Gupta, A. K. (1994). Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist-CEO interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1618–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, K. J., & Hyman, M. R. (2003). The development of a virtue ethics scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(2), 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. (2008). The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 727–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., & Broberg, J. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22(9), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Ketchen, D. J. (2008). Research on organizational configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1053–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1992). Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelean approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 317–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, K. C., Ringer, R. C., & Taylor, S. A. (2001). THE* rules of stakeholder satisfaction (*Timeliness, honesty, empathy). Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. C., Saar-Tsechansky, M., & Macskassy, S. (2008). More than words: Quantifying language to measure firms’ fundamentals. Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1437–1467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titman, S., & Trueman, B. (1986). Information quality and the valuation of new issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 8(2), 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. A., & Goodstein, J. (2007). Character is not “dead” in management research: A review of individual character and organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management, 33(6), 928–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2003). The structure and management of alliances: Syndication in the venture capital industry. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2073–2102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., & Robbie, K. (1998). Venture capital and private equity: A review and synthesis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 25(5–6), 521–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachary, M. A., McKenny, A. M., Short, J. C., & Payne, G. T. (2011). Family firms and market orientation: construct validation and comparative analysis. Family Business Review, 24(3), 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Tyge Payne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLeod, M.S., Moore, C.B., Payne, G.T. et al. Organizational Virtue and Stakeholder Interdependence: An Empirical Examination of Financial Intermediaries and IPO Firms. J Bus Ethics 149, 785–798 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3021-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3021-1

Keywords

Navigation