Abstract
The article considers six standard arguments in favour of an unfettered free market: (1) the freedom to consume; (2) the freedom of the seller; (3) the freedom of the producer; (4) freedom from government interference; (5) lower costs; (6) promotion of democracy. It demonstrates that each of these arguments turns out to be incoherent on closer examination. The ground of this incoherence it is shown, is the market doctrine's systematic omission of non-business costs and benefits from its analysis, a methodological blindness which can only be overcome by a wider-lensed comprehension of economic value.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McMurtry, J. The Contradictions of Free Market Doctrine: Is There a Solution?. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 645–662 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017951827011
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017951827011