Skip to main content
Log in

Erwin Schrödinger and the rise of wave mechanics. III. Early response and applications

  • Part IV. Invited Papers Commemorating The Centenary Of The Birth Of Erwin Schrödinger
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article (Part III) deals with the early applications of wave mechanics to atomic problems—including the demonstration of the formal mathematical equivalence of wave mechanics with the quantum mechanics of Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan, and that of Dirac—by Schrödinger himself and others. The new theory was immediately accepted by the scientific community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Letter from E. Schrödinger to A. Sommerfeld, January 23, 1926.

  2. R. Courant and D. Hilbert,Methoden der mathematischen Physik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 515.

  4. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 518, footnote 1; English translation, p. 33, footnote 1.

  5. R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Ref. 313..

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 516; English translation, p. 31.

  7. Actually, what have been called the Hermitian orthogonal functions are not exp(−x 2/2)H n (x), but the normalized functions (2n n!)−1/2·exp(−x 2/2)H n (x). [See Ref. 313, p. 77, Eq. (66).]

  8. E. Schrödinger, Der stetige Übergang von der Mikro- zur Makromechanik,Naturwissenschaften 14, 664–666 (1926), English translation: The Continuous Transition from Micro- to Macromechanics, Ref. 256, pp. 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 320, p. 665; English translation, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 519; English translation, p. 34.

  11. P. Ehrenfest, Bemerkung betreffs der spezifischen Wärme zweiatomiger Gase,Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 15, 451–457 (1913); reprinted in Collected Scientific Papers, pp. 333–339.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 520; English translation, pp. 34–35.

  13. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 521; English translation, p. 35.

  14. For details, see Ref. 245, Chapter IV, pp. 596–599.

  15. P. S. Epstein, Zur Theorie des Starkeffekts,Phys. Z. 17, 148–150 (1916);Ann. Phys. 50, 489–521 (1916).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. A. Kramers, Intensities of spectral lines: On the Application of the Quantum Theory to the Problem of the Relative Intensities of the Components of the Fine Structure and of the Stark Effect of These Lines of the Hydrogen Spectra,Kgl. Danske Vid. Selsk. Skrifter, 8. Raekke III.3; reprinted inCollected Scientific Papers, 5–108 (1956).

  17. E. Schrödinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Dritte Mitteilung: Störungstheorie, mit Anwendung auf den Starkeffekt der Balmerlinien),Ann. Phys. 80, 437–490 (1926); English translation in Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics, 1928, pp. 62–101; p. 463, English translation, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 330, p. 463; English translation, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Letter from W. Wien to E. Schrödinger, March 21, 1926.

  20. Letter from E. Schrödinger to W. Wien, June 18, 1926.

  21. See A. Sommerfeld,Three Lectures on Atomic Physics (based on lectures given in March at the University of London), Methuen, London (1926).

  22. Letter from E. Schrödinger to M. Planck, February 26, 1926.

  23. Letter from M. Planck to E. Schrödinger, April 2, 1926.

  24. Letter from A. Einstein to E. Schrödinger, April 16, 1926.

  25. Letter from E. Schrödinger to A. Einstein, April 23, 1926.

  26. Letter from A. Einstein to E. Schrödinger, April 26, 1926.

  27. Letter from A. Einstein to P. Ehrenfest, February 12, 1926.

  28. See, especially, letter from H. A. Lorentz to E. Schrödinger, May 27, 1926 in Ref. 339.

  29. Letter from M. Planck to E. Schrödinger, May 24, 1926.

  30. Letter from M. Planck to E. Schrödinger, June 4, 1926.

  31. Letter from E. Schrödinger to M. Planck, June 11, 1926.

  32. Letter from E. Schrödinger to W. Wien, March 19, 1926.

  33. Letter from W. Wien to E. Schrödinger, March 21, 1926.

  34. M. Born, W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, Zur Quantenmechanik II,Z. Phys. 36, 557–615 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Schrödinger, Über das Verhältnis der Heisenberg-Born-Jordanschen Quantenmechanik zu der meinen,Ann. Phys. 79, 734–756 (1926); “On the Relation between the Quantum Mechanics of Heisenberg, Born, and Jordan, and That of Schrödinger,” inCollected Papers on Wave Mechanics, (Blackie and Son, Ltd., London and Glasgow, 1927), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  36. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 735; English translation, pp. 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, pp. 735–736, English translation, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 726; English translation, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  39. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 726; English translation, pp. 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  40. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 737; slightly revised English translation, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  41. W. Heisenberg, Über quantenmechanische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen,Z. Phys. 33, 879–893 (1925), Eq. (16).

    Google Scholar 

  42. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 244, p. 362, Eq. (5).

  43. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, pp. 737–738; English translation, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  44. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 739; English translation, pp. 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  45. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, pp. 745–746; English translation, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 749, English translation, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  47. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 750; English translation, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Letter from W. Pauli to G. Wentzel, May 8, 1926.

  49. Letter from W. Pauli to P. Jordan, April 12, 1926.

  50. C. Eckart, The Solution of the Problem of the Simple Oscillator by a Combination of the Schrödinger and the Lanczos Theories,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 12, 473–476 (1926), p. 473.

    Google Scholar 

  51. C. Eckart, Operator Calculus and the Solution of the Equations of Quantum Dynamics,Phys. Rev. 28, 711–726 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  52. C. Eckart, Ref. 365, p. 711.

    Google Scholar 

  53. L. Flamm, Die Grundlagen der Wellenmechanik,Phys. Z. 27, 600–617 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  54. L. de Broglie, “Remarques sur la nouvelle Mécanique ondulatoire,”Compt. Rend. (Paris)183, 272–274 (1926), p. 272.

    Google Scholar 

  55. P. A. M. Dirac, On the Theory of Quantum Mechanics,Proc. R. Soc. London A 112, 661–677 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  56. C. G. Darwin, The Electron as a Vector Wave,Nature (London) 119, 282–284 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  57. E. Fues, Das Eigenschwingungsspektrum zweiatomiger Moleküle in der Undulationsmechanik,Ann. Phys. 80, 367–396 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  58. K. Schwarzschild, Zur Quantenhypothese,Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. (Berlin), 548–568 (1916).

  59. T. Heurlinger,Untersuchungen über die Struktur der Bandenspektren, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Lund, 1918;Zur Theorie der Bandenspektren, Phys. Z. 20, 188–190 (1919); Über Atomschwingungen und Molekülspektra,Z. Phys. 1, 82–91 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  60. W. Lenz, Zur Theorie der Bandenspektren,Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 21, 632–643 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

  61. A. Kratzer, Die ultraroten Rotationsbanden der Halogenwasserstoffe,Z. Phys. 3, 289–307 (1920); Die spektropische Bestätigung der Isotope des Chlors,Z. Phys. 3, 460–465 (1920); Störungen und Kombinationsprinzip im System der violetten Cyanbanden,Sitz. Gayer. Akad. Wiss. (München), 107–118 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  62. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 522 ff.

  63. See A. Sommerfeld,Atombau und Spektrallinien, 4th edn., (Fried. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, 1924), p. 833 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  64. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 526; English translation, p. 39.

  65. E. Schrödinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. (Dritte Mitteilung: Störungstheorie, mit Anwendung auf den Starkeffekt der Balmerlinien),Ann. Phys. 80, 437–490 (1927);Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics, pp. 62–101.

    Google Scholar 

  66. L. Mensing, Die Rotations-Schwingungsbanden nach der Quantenmechanik,Z. Phys. 36, 814–823 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  67. W. Heisenberg, Ref. 355, pp. 89–893.

    Google Scholar 

  68. M. Born and P. Jordan, Zur Quantenmechanik,Z. Phys. 34, 858–888 (1925), p. 860.

    Google Scholar 

  69. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, pp. 513–514; English translation, p. 30.

  70. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 753; English translation, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  71. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 379, p. 470–471, 474; English translation, pp. 88, 90.

    Google Scholar 

  72. W. Pauli, Über das Wasserstoffspektrum vom Standpunkt der neuen Quantenmechanik,Z. Phys. 36, 336–363 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Letter from W. Pauli to G. Wentzel, May 8, 1926.

  74. Letter from W. Pauli to A. Landé, June 2, 1926.

  75. Letter from W. Pauli to G. Wentzel, July 5, 1926.

  76. G. Wentzel, Über die Intensitäten in der Röntgenspektren,Naturwissenschaften 14, 621–622 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  77. G. Wentzel, Ref. 390, p. 621.

    Google Scholar 

  78. G. Wentzel, Ref. 390, pp. 621–622.

    Google Scholar 

  79. A. Jönsson, Intensitätsmessungen von Röntgenstrahlen mit Hilfe der Geigerschen Spitzkammer,Z. Phys. 36, 426–456, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  80. H. Hönl, Die Intensitäten der Zeemankomponenten,Z. Phys. 31, 340–354 (1925); Zum Intensitätsproblem der Spektrallinien,Ann. Phys. 79, 273–323 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  81. R. H. Fowler, Applications of the Correspondence Principle to the Theory of Line Intensities in Band Spectra,Philos. Mag. 49, 1272–1288, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  82. See E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, Section 3.3.

  83. E. Fues, Zur Intensität der Bandenlinien und des Affinitätsspektrums zweiatomiger Moleküle,Ann. Phys. 81, 281–313 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  84. E. Schrödinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. (Vierte Mitteilung),Ann. Phys. 81, 109–139 (1926); inCollected Papers on Wave Mechanics, pp. 102–123.

    Google Scholar 

  85. See E. Fues, Ref. 397, Eq. (26), where Fues used a slightly different energy parameter.

    Google Scholar 

  86. E. Fues, Ref. 397, p. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  87. I. Waller, Der Starkeffekt zweiter Ordnung bei Wasserstoff und die Rydbergkorrektion der Spektra von He und Li+,Z. Phys. 38, 635–646 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  88. I. Waller, Ref. 401, pp. 640–641.

    Google Scholar 

  89. G. Wentzel, Eine Verallgemeinerung der Quantenbedingungen für die Zwecke der Wellenmechanik,Z. Phys. 38, 518–529 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  90. C. Eckart, The Hydrogen Spectrum in the New Quantum Theory,Phys. Rev. 28, 927–935 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  91. See, e.g., Ref. 389.

  92. C. Eckart, Ref. 404, p. 935.

    Google Scholar 

  93. P. S. Epstein, The Stark Effect from the Point of View of Schrödinger's Quantum Theory,Phys. Rev. 28, 695–710 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  94. See P. S. Epstein, Ref. 407, p. 708, Eq. (61).

    Google Scholar 

  95. M. Born, Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. (Voläufige Mitteilung),Z. Phys. 37, 863–867 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  96. M. Born, Ref. 409, p. 863.

    Google Scholar 

  97. M. Born and N. Wiener, A New Formulation of the Laws of Quantization of Periodic and Aperiodic Phenomena,J. Math. Phys. M.I.T. 5, 84–98 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  98. M. Born, Ref. 409, p. 864.

    Google Scholar 

  99. M. Born, Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge,Z. Phys. 38, 803–827 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  100. M. Born, Ref. 409, p. 864.

    Google Scholar 

  101. M. Born, Ref. 413, p. 803.

    Google Scholar 

  102. M. Born, Ref. 413, p. 804.

    Google Scholar 

  103. For details of Born's treatment of atomic collision processes, see J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987), Part 2, Chapter IV, Section 4, pp. 723–735.

    Google Scholar 

  104. M. Born, Ref. 413, p. 826.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Letter from W. Heisenberg to W. Pauli, May 5, 1926.

  106. Letter from W. Heisenberg to M. Born, May 26, 1926.

  107. W. Heisenberg, Mehrkörperproblem und Resonanz in der Quantenmechanik,Z. Phys. 38, 411–426 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Letter from H. Heisenberg to W. Pauli, June 8, 1926.

  109. W. Heisenberg, Über die Spektra von Atomsystemen mit zwei Elektronen,Z. Phys. 39, 499–518 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  110. W. Heisenberg, Ref. 423, p. 518.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Letter from W. Heisenberg to W. Pauli, July 28, 1926.

  112. W. Heisenberg, in conversation with J. Mehra, April 1960 and June 1968.

  113. P. A. M. Dirac, The Fundamental Equations of Quantum Mechanics,Proc. R. Soc. London A 109, 642–653 (1925); Quantum Mechanics and a Preliminary Investigation of the Hydrogen Atom,Proc. R. Soc. London A 110, 561–579 (1926); Relativity Quantum Mechanics with an Application to Compton Scattering,Proc. R. Soc. London A 111, 405–423 (1926); On Quantum Algebra,Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 23, 412–418 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  114. P. A. M. Dirac, On the Theory of Quantum Mechanics,Proc. R. Soc. London A 112, 661–677 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  115. P. A. M. Dirac, The Elimination of Nodes in Quantum Mechanics,Proc. R. Soc. London A 111, 281–305 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  116. P. A. M. Dirac, Relativity Quantum Mechanics with an Application to Compton Scattering,Proc. R. Soc. London A 111, 405–423 (1926). Dirac noted in this paper that some difficulties arise between the “quantum energy”E and the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian, because the new variableE ought to commute with, say, the position variable, whereas the Hamiltonian does not do so.

    Google Scholar 

  117. E. Fermi presented a short note, Sulla quantizzazione del gas perfetto monoatomico,Rend. R. Accad. Lincei 3, 145–149 (1926), on February 7, 1926, and an extended version, Zur Quantelung des idealen einatomigen Gases,Z. Phys. 36, 902–912 (1926), was received on March 26, 1926. Fermi wrote to Dirac on September 1926, drawing his attention to his own earlier work.

    Google Scholar 

  118. P. A. M. Dirac, in Conversations with J. Mehra, June 1968 at Trieste, Italy; also AHQP Interview with Dirac.

  119. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 244, p. 372; English translation, p. 9.

  120. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, pp. 489–514.

  121. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 506; English translation, p. 25.

  122. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 256, p. 508; English translation, p. 26.

  123. Letter from W. Wien to E. Schrödinger, May 13, 1926.

  124. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 735, footnote 2; English translation, p. 46, footnote 1.

    Google Scholar 

  125. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 751.

    Google Scholar 

  126. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 752.

    Google Scholar 

  127. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 349, p. 753 English translation, p. 59. Schrödinger's claim with respect to the possibility of treating collision processes in wave mechanics was substantiated a few months later by the work of Max Born, as we have reported earlier.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Letter from E. Schrödinger to W. Wien, June 18, 1926.

  129. Letter from E. Wigner to J. Mehra, November 20, 1985.

  130. E. Schrödinger, Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. (Vierte Mitteilung),Ann. Phys. 81, 109–139 (1926), p 109; inCollected Papers on Wave Mechanics, pp. 102–123, p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  131. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 446, p. 110; English translation, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  132. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 446, p. 110; English translation, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  133. R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Ref. 313, Chapter V, Section 8.

    Google Scholar 

  134. P. A. M. Dirac, Ref. 428, pp. 674–676.

    Google Scholar 

  135. P. A. M. Dirac, The Quantum Theory of Emission and Absorption of Radiation,Proc. R. Soc. London A 114, 243–265 (1927); The Quantum Theory of Dispersion,Proc. R. Soc. London A 114, 610–624 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  136. Letter from W. Wien to E. Schrödinger, June 23, 1926.

  137. See the announcement inVerh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 7, 36 (1926). Walther Nernst chaired the meeting.

  138. The meeting was chaired by the astrophysicist Robert Emden. [SeeVerh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 7, 38 (1926).]

    Google Scholar 

  139. E. Schrödinger, An Undulatory Theory of the Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules,Phys. Rev. 28, 1049–1070 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  140. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 456, p. 1049.

    Google Scholar 

  141. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 456, p. 1050.

    Google Scholar 

  142. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 456, p. 1070.

    Google Scholar 

  143. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 446, p. 139; English translation, p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Letter from A. Einstein to A. Sommerfeld, August 21, 1926.

  145. W. Heisenberg,Gesammelte Werke/Collected Works, Series C/Volume IV:Biographisches und Kernphysik, (R. Piper Verlag, Munich, Zurich, 0000), pp. 26–27.

  146. Letter from A. Sommerfeld to W. Pauli, July 26, 1926.

  147. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 446, pp. 133–134; English translation, p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Letter from W. Pauli to P. Jordan, Ref. 363, Eq. (3).

  149. O. Klein, Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie,Z. Phys. 37, 895 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  150. T. Kaluza, Zum Unitätsproblem de Physik,Sitzber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. (Berlin), 966–972 (1921).

  151. O. Klein, Ref. 466, p. 895.

    Google Scholar 

  152. V. Fock, Zur Schrödingerschen Wellenmechanik,Z. Phys. 38, 242–250 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  153. V. Fock, Über die invariante Form der Wellen- und der Bawegungsgleichungen für einen geladenen Massenpunkt,Z. Phys. 39, 226–232 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  154. Th. De Donder and F. H. van den Dungen, La quantification déduite de la Gravifique einsteinienne,Compt. Rend. (Paris) 183, 22–24 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  155. Th. De Donder, Application de la quantification de la Gravifique einsteinienne,Compt. Rend. (Paris) 183, 594–595 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  156. L. de Broglie, Remarques sur la nouvelle Mécanique ondulatoire,Compt. Rend. (Paris) 183, 272–274 (1926). De Broglie's method of deriving Eq. (205) was basically the one originally pursued by Schrödinger and independently given by Pauli.

    Google Scholar 

  157. J. Kudar, Zur vierdimensionalen Formulierung der undulatorischen Mechanik,Ann. Phys. 81, 632–636 (1926); Schrödingersche Wellengleichung und vierdimensionale Relativitätsmechanik,Phys. Z. 27, 724 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  158. W. Gordon, Der Comptoneffekt nach der Schrödingerschen Theorie,Z. Phys. 40, 117–133 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  159. Pauli called Eq. (205) “the equation with many fathers”: “I do not believe that the relativistic equation of second order with many fathers corresponds to reality” (Letter from W. Pauli to E. Schrödinger, November 22, 1926); also see H. Kragh, Equation with Many Fathers: The Klein-Gordon Equation in 1926,Am. J. Phys. 52, 1024–1033 (1984), and J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Volume 5, Part 2, (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987), Chapter IV, Section 5.

  160. Letter from W. Heisenberg to W. Pauli, June 8, 1926.

  161. Letter from W. Heisenberg to W. Pauli, July 28, 1926.

  162. Letter from N. Bohr to E. Schrödinger, September 11, 1926.

  163. For an account of Schrödinger's visit to Copenhagen, see J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987), Volume 5, Part 2, Chapter IV, Section 5, and K. Stolzenburg, Die Entwicklung des Bohrschen Komplementaritätsgedankens in der Jahren 1924 bis 1929, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stuttgart, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Letter from E. Schrödinger to N. Bohr, September 21, 1926.

  165. Telegram from E. Schrödinger to N. Bohr, September 27, 1926.

  166. See W. Heisenberg,Physics and Beyond (Harper and Row, New York, Evanston, and London, 1971), pp. 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  167. See J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg, Ref. 481, p. 823, and footnote 295.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Letter from E. Schrödinger to W. Wien, October 21, 1926.

  169. Letter from N. Bohr to R. H. Fowler, October 26, 1926.

  170. G. Breit, A Correspondence Principle in the Compton Effect,Phys. Rev. 27, 362–372 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  171. E. Schrödinger, Über den Comptoneffekt,Ann. Phys. 82, 257–264 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  172. E. Schrödinger, Über das thermische Gleichgewicht zwischen Licht-und Schallstrahlen,Phys. Z. 25, 89–94 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  173. G. Wentzel, Zur Theorie des Photoelektrischen Effekts,Z. Phys. 40, 574–589 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  174. G. Wentzel, Über die Richtungsverteilung der Photoelektronen,Z. Phys. 41, 828–832 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  175. J. Robert Oppenheimer, Quantentheorie des kontinuierlichen Absorptionsspektrums,Naturwissenschaften 14, 1282 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  176. J. Robert Oppenheimer, On the Quantum Theory of the Problem of Two Bodies,Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 23, 422–431 (1926); Quantum Theory and Intensity Distribution of Continuous Spectra,Nature (London) 18, 771 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  177. J. Robert Oppenheimer, Zur Quantenmechanik kontinuierlichen Spektren,Z. Phys. 41, 268–293 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  178. C. Manneback, Die Dielektrizitätskonstante der zweiatomigen Dipolgase nach der Wellenmechanik,Phys. Z. 27, 563–569 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  179. L. Mensing and W. Pauli, Über die Dielektrizitätskonstante von Dipolgasen nach der Quantenmechanik,Phys. Z. 27, 509–512 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  180. C. Manneback, Ref. 496,.

    Google Scholar 

  181. F. Reiche, Die Quantelung des symmetrischen Kreisels nach Schrödingers Undulationsmechanik,Z. Phys. 39, 444–464 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  182. E. Schrödinger, Ref. 345, pp. 747–748.

  183. H. Rademacher and F. Reiche, Die Quantelung des symmetrischen Kreisels nach Schrödingers Undulationsmechanik. II,Z. Phys. 41, 453–493 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  184. D. M. Dennison, The Rotation of Molecules,Phys. Rev. 28, 318–333 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  185. R. K. Kronig and I. I. Rabi, The Symmetrical Top in the Undulatory Mechanics,Phys. Rev. 29, 262–269 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  186. C. Manneback, Dielektrizitätskonstante und Starkeffekt polyatomiger Dipolgase mit symmetrischen Molekülen nach der Wellenmechanik,Phys. Z. 28, 72–84 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  187. W. Pauli, Über das Wasserstoffmolekülions,Ann. Phys. 68, 177–240 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  188. K. F. Niessen,Zur Quantentheorie des Wasserstoffmolekülions, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Utrecht, Utrecht: I. van Druten.

  189. Letter from W. Heisenberg to W. Pauli, November 23, 1926.

  190. Øyvind Burrau, Berechnung des Energiewertes des Wasserstoffmolekül-Ions (H +2 ) im Normalizustand,Kgl. Dansk. Vid. Selsk. Math.-Fys. Medd. 7, No. 14 (1927).

  191. E. Schrödinger, Reisetagebuch. See K. von Meyenn, Die Rezeption der Wellenmechanik und Schrödingers Reise nach Amerika im Winter 1926/27,Gesnerus 39, 261–277 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  192. Letter from E. Schrödinger to W. Wien, September 3, 1927.

  193. A. Schrödinger, AHQP Interview, April 5, 1963, p. 8.

  194. C. L. Davisson and L. H. Germer, The Scattering of Electrons by a Single Crystal of Nickel,Nature (London) 119, 558–560 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  195. G. P. Thomson and A. Reid, Diffraction of Cathode Rays by a Thin Film,Nature (London) 119, 890 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article (in three parts) is an expanded version of the Schrödinger Centenary Lecture delivered by me at CERN (Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire), 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland, on July 30, 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehra, J. Erwin Schrödinger and the rise of wave mechanics. III. Early response and applications. Found Phys 18, 107–184 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882930

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882930

Keywords

Navigation