Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Niels Bohr's discussions with Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrödinger: The origins of the principles of uncertainty and complementarity

  • Part I. Invited Papers Dedicated To Ilya Prigogine
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the main outlines of the discussions between Niels Bohr with Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrödinger during 1920–1927 are treated. From the formulation of quantum mechanics in 1925–1926 and wave mechanics in 1926, there emerged Born's statistical interpretation of the wave function in summer 1926, and on the basis of the quantum mechanical transformation theory—formulated in fall 1926 by Dirac, London, and Jordan—Heisenberg formulated the uncertainty principle in early 1927. At the Volta Conference in Como in September 1927 and at the fifth Solvay Conference in Brussels the following month, Bohr publicly enunciated his complementarity principle, which had been developing in his mind for several years. The Bohr-Einstein discussions about the consistency and completeness of qnautum mechanics and of physical theory as such—formally begun in October 1927 at the fifth Solvay Conference and carried on at the sixth Solvay Conference in October 1930—were continued during the next decades. All these aspects are briefly summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules, Papers of 1913 reprinted fromPhilosophical Magazine with an Introduction by L. Rosenfeld (Munksgaard Ltd., Copenhagen; W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1963).

  2. W. Heisenberg, “Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen,”Z. Phys. 33, 879–893 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Born and P. Jordan, “Zur Quantenmechanik,”Z. Phys. 34, 858–888 (1925); M. Born, W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, “Zur Quantenmechanik II,”Z. Phys. 35, 557–615 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. A. M. Dirac, “The fundamental equations of quantum mechanics,”Proc. R. Soc. London A 109, 642–653 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Schrödinger,Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics (Blackie and Son, Ltd, London and Glasgow, 1928).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Schrödinger, “Über das Verhältnis der Heisenberg-Born-Jordanschen Quantenmechanik zu der meinen,”Ann. Phys. 79, 734–756 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Pauli,Briefwechsel/Scientific Correspondence, (Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, and Berlin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Eckart, “The solution of the problem of the simple oscillator by a combination of the Schrödinger equation and the Lanczos theories,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 12, 473–476 (1926); “Operator calculus and the solution of the equations of quantum dynamics,”Phys. Rev. 28, 927–935 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Born, “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge (Vorläufige Mitteilung),”Z. Phys. 37, 863–867 (1926); “Quantenmechanik der Stoßforgänge,”Z. Phys. 38, 803–827 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. London, Winkelvariable und kanonische Transformationen in der Undulationsmechanik,”Z. Phys. 40, 193–210 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. A. M. Dirac, “The physical interpretation of quantum dynamics,”Proc. R. Soc. London A 113, 621–641 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Jordan, “Über eine neue Begründung der Quantenmechanik,”Z. Phys. 40, 809–838 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Heisenberg, “Über den anschaulischen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik,”Z. Phys. 43, 172–198 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Heisenberg,Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations (Harper and Row, New York, 1971); J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Vol. 5, Part 2 (Springer Verlag, New York, Heidelberg, and Berlin, 1977), Chapter IV, Section 5; K. Stolzenburg, “Die Entwicklung des Bohrschen Komplementaritätsgedankens in den Jahren 1924 bis 1929,” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stuttgart, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Vol. 6:The Completion of Quantum Mechanics, Book I, Part 2 (Springer-Verlag, New York, to appear in 1988); J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Vol. 2 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982); J. Mehra, “The birth of quantum mechanics,” Heisenberg Memorial Lecture (CERN, Geneva, March 30, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Bohr, “The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory,” inAtti del Congresso Internazionale dei Fisici, 11–20 Settembre 1927 (Nicola Zanichelli, Bologna, 1928), Vol. 2, pp. 565–568.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Électrons et Photons—Rapports et Discussions du Cinquième Conseil de Physique Tenu à Bruxelles du 24 au 29 Octobre 1927 sous les Auspices de L'Institut International de Physique Solvay (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1928); J. Mehra,The Solvay Conferences on Physics: Aspects of the Development of Physics since 1911 (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland/Boston, 1975).

  18. J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Le Magnétisme—Rapports et Discussions du Sixième Conseil de Physique sous les Auspices de L'Institut International de Physique Solvay (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1932).

  20. J. Mehra and H. Rechenberg,The Historical Development of Quantum Theory, Vols. 1–6 (Springer-Verlag, New York, Heidelberg and Berlin, 1982–1988).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Jammer,The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974), Chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Einstein, “Strahlungs-Emission und -Absorption nach der Quantentheorie,”Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 18, 318–323 (1916); “Quantentheorie der Strahlung,”Mitt. Phys. Ges. Zürich 16, 47–62 (1916); “Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung,”Phys. Z. 18, 121–128 (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Born-Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London and Basigstoke, 1971).

  24. A. Einstein, “Grudlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,”Ann. Phys. 49, 769–822 (1916); J. Mehra,Einstein, Hilbert and the Theory of Gravitation (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland and Boston, Massachusetts, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Einstein, “Bietet die Feldtheorie Möglichkeiten für die Lösung des Quantenproblems?”Berliner Ber., 359–364 (1923).

  26. P. Speziali (ed.),Albert Einstein, Michele Besso, Correspondance 1903–1955 (Hermann, Paris, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  27. N. Bohr, “Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics,” inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (The Library of Living Philosophers, Inc., Tudor Publishing Company, 1949, 1951; Harper and Row, New York, 1959).

  28. A. Einstein, “Über die Entwicklung unserer Anschauungen über das Wesen und die Konstitution der Strahlung,”Phys. 10, 817–825 (1909).

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. Bohr, “Über die Serienspektren der Elemente,”Z. Phys. 2, 423–469 1920). English translation: “On the series spectra of elements,” inCollected Works 3, 241–260 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Albert Einstein-Arnold Sommerfeld Briefwechsel, A. Hermann, ed. (Schwabe and Co., Basel, Stuttgart, 1968), p. 75 (quoted in M. Jammer, Ref. 21, p. 123).

  31. A. H. Compton, “Secondary radiation produced by X-rays,”Bull. Natl. Res. Council 4 (Part 2), No. 20 (October 1922).

  32. A. H. Compton, “A quantum theory of the scattering of X-rays by light elements,”Phys. Rev. 21, 483–502 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. Debye, “Zerstreuung von Röntgenstrahlen und Quantentheorie,”Phys. Z. 24, 161–166 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Einstein, “Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtpunkt,”Ann. Phys. 17, 138–148 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Mehra, “The birth of quantum mechanics,” Werner Heisenberg Memorial Lecture, CERN, Geneva, March 30, 1976 (CERN 76-10, May 14, 1976).

  36. J. C. Slater, “Radiation and Atoms,”Nature (London) 133, 307–308 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  37. N. Bohr, H. A. Kramers, and J. C. Slater, “The quantum theory of radiation,”Philos. Mag. 47, 785–802 (1924). (In German: “Über die Quantentheorie der Strahlung,”Z. Phys. 24, 69–87 (1924).)

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. A. Kramers, “The Law of Dispersion and Bohr's Theory of Spectra,”Nature (London) 113, 673–674 (1924); “The quantum theory of dispersion,”Nature (London) 114 310 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  39. W. Bothe and H. Geiger, “Experimentelles zur Theorie von Bohr, Kramers und Slater,”Naturwissenschaften 13, 440–441; “Über das Wesen des Compton-effekts, ein experimenteller Beitrag zur Theorie der Strahlung,”Z. Phys. 32, 639–663 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  40. G. E. Uhlenbeck and S. Goudsmit, “Ersetzung der Hypothese vom unmechanischen Zwang durch eine Forderung bezüglich des inneren Verhaltens jedes einzelnen Elektrons,”Naturwissenschaften 13, 953–954 (1925); “Spinning electrons and the structure of spectra,”Nature (London) 117, 264–265 (1926)

    Google Scholar 

  41. W. Heisenberg,Physics and Beyond, (Harper and Row, New York, Evanston, and London, 1971), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  42. H. A. Kramers, “Über den Einfluss eines elektrischen Feldes auf die Feinstruktur der Wasserstofflinien,”Z. Phys. 3, 199–223 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  43. N. Bohr,Collected Works, Volume 4: The Periodic System (1920–1923), J. Reed Nelson, de. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford, 1977), p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  44. W. Heisenberg, “Quantum theory and its interpretation,” inNiels Bohr: His Life and Work as Seen by His Friends and Colleagues, S. Rozental, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967), pp. 94–95.

    Google Scholar 

  45. W. Heisenberg, “Über eine Anwendung des Korrespondenzprinzips auf die Frage nach der Polarization des Fluoreszenzlichtes,”Z. Phys. 31, 617–626 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  46. H. A. Kramers and W. Heisenberg, “Über die Streuung von Strahlung durch Atome,”Z. Phys. 31, 681–708 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  47. W. Heisenberg, “Erinnerungen an die Zeit der Entwicklung der Quantenmechanik,” inTheoretical Physics in the Twentieth Century—A Memorial Volume to Wolfgang Pauli, M. Fierz and V. F. Weisskopf, eds. (Interscience, New York, 1960), pp. 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  48. E. Mach,Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung, 7th edn. (F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig, 1912); English translation:The Science of Mechanics (Open Court Publishing Company: Chicago, 1893).

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. Einstein, “Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper,”Ann. Phys. 17, 891–921 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  50. H. Minkowski, “Raum und Zeit,”Phys. Z. 10, 104–111 (1909).

    Google Scholar 

  51. M. Born and P. Jordan, “Zur Quantenmechanik,”Z. Phys. 34, 858–888 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  52. M. Born, W. Heisenberg, and P. Jordan, “Zur Quantenmechanik II,”Z. Phys. 35, 557–615 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  53. W. Lenz, “Über den Bewegungsablauf und die Quantenzustände der gestörten Keplerbewegung,”Z. Phys. 24, 197–207 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  54. W. Pauli, “Über das Wasserstoffspektrum von Standpunkt der neuen Quantenmechanik,”Z. Phys. 36, 236–363 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  55. C. Lanczos, “Über eine feldmäßige Darstellung der neuen Quantenmechanik,”Z. Phys. 35, 812–830 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  56. M. Born,Problems of Atomic Dynamics, reprint (M.I.T. Press, Cambrige, Massachusetts, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  57. M. Born and N. Wiener, “A new formulation of the laws of quantization of periodic and aperiodic phenomena,”J. Math. Phys. M.I.T.5, 84–98 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  58. M. Born and N. Wiener, “Eine neue Formulierung der Quantengesetze für periodische und aperiodische Vorgänge,”Z. Phys. 36, 174–187 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  59. J. Mehra, “The golden age of theoretical physics: P.A.M. Dirac's scientific work from 1924–1933,” inAspects of Quantum Theory, A. Salam and E. P. Wigner, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1972) pp. 17–59.

    Google Scholar 

  60. P. A. M. Dirac, “Quantum mechanics and a preliminary investigation of the hydrogen atom,”Proc. R. Soc. London A 110 561–573 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  61. P. A. M. Dirac, “On Quantum algebra,”Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 23, 412–418 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  62. P. A. M. Dirac,Quantum Mechanics, Dissertation, Cambridge University, May 1926.

  63. E. Schrödinger, “Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. I,”Ann. Phys. 79, 361–376 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  64. H. Weyl, “Singuläre Integralgleichungen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Fourierschen Integraltheorems,” Göttingen dissertation, February 1908.

  65. L. de Broglie,Recherches sur la Théorie des Quanta, Thèse (Masson & Cie, Paris, 1924);Ann. Phys. 3, 22–128 (1925); Paris dissertation, November 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  66. M. Born, “Erwin Schrödinger†,”Phys. Blätter 17, 85–87 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  67. W. Heisenberg, “Mehrkörperproblem und Resonanz in der Quantenmechanik,”Z. Phys. 38, 411–426 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  68. W. Heisenberg, “Über die Spektra von Atomsystemen mit zwei Elektronen,”Z. Phys. 39, 499–518 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  69. E. Schrödinger, “Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Vierte Mitteilung),”Ann. Phys. 81, 109–139 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Briefe zur Wellenmechanik, K. Przibram (ed.) (Springer-Verlag, Viennas 1963); English translation (by M. J. Klein) asLetters on Wave Mechanics (Philosophical Library, Inc., New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  71. W. Pauli,Scientific Correspondence Vol. I (Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  72. M. Jammer,The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), pp. 285–289; reference to A. Einstein: M. Born, “Albert Einstein und das Lichtquantum,”Naturwissenschaften 11, 425–431 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  73. A. Pais,Inward Bound (Oxford University Press, New York, 1986), p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  74. G. Wentzel, “Zwei Bemerkungen über die Zerstreuung korpuscularer Strahlen als Beugungserscheinung,”Z. Phys. 40, 590–593 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  75. E. Schrödinger, “Der stetige Übergang von der Mikro- zur Makromechenik,”Naturwissenschaften 14, 664–666 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  76. E. H. Kennard, “Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen,”Z. Phys. 44, 326–352 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  77. G. Holton, “The roots of complementarity,” inThematic Origins of Scientific Thought (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1973), pp. 115–161.

    Google Scholar 

  78. J. Mehra, “Satyendra Nath Bose, 1894–1974,”Biog. Mem. Fellows Roy. Soc. 21 (1975).

  79. W. Pauli, “Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik,”Handbuch der Physik, Vol. 24, H. Geiger and K. Scheel, eds. (Springer, Berlin, 1933), and edn., p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  80. C. F. von Weizsäcker, “Komplementarität und Logik,”Naturwissenschaften 42, 521–529, and 545–555 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  81. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”,Phys. Rev. 47 77–780 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  82. N. Bohr, “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”,Phys. Rev. 48, 696–702 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  83. E. Schrödinger, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,”Naturwissenschaften 23, 807–812, 824–828, 844–849 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituts Internationaux de Physique et de Chimie (Solvay), U.L.B. Campus Plaine, Code Postal 231, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Jagdish Mehra

  2. 7830 Candle Lane, 77071, Houston, Texas

    Jagdish Mehra

Authors
  1. Jagdish Mehra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mehra, J. Niels Bohr's discussions with Albert Einstein, Werner Heisenberg, and Erwin Schrödinger: The origins of the principles of uncertainty and complementarity. Found Phys 17, 461–506 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01559698

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01559698

Keywords

Search

Navigation