Skip to main content
Log in

Targeted Killing, Assassination, and the Problem of Dirty Hands

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. I am grateful to Christina Nick for pressing me on this point.

  2. The distinction between act and rule utilitarianism is admittedly problematic and depends on a theory of rules which disallows the endless addition of new (kinds of) detail as exceptions which are nonetheless part of the rule itself. How to frame such a rule for rules is probably impossible. I am grateful to Richard Bronaugh for this comment. I nonetheless assume throughout that there is a valuable and tenable distinction between Act and Rule Utilitarianism.

  3. See esp: Former President Barack Obama, Speech at the National Defense University. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university.

  4. One Chronicles 22:8 “You have shed much blood and have fought many wars. You are not to build a house for my Name, because you have shed much blood on the earth in my sight.” (One Chronicles, 28:3). But God said unto me, ‘Thou shalt not build a house for My name, because thou hast been a man of war and hast shed blood.’

  5. http://www.btselem.org This website no longer displays the statistics from the early 2000’s but their recent figures equally indicate relatively low collateral damage in TK.

  6. With reference to B’tselem.

  7. http://www.btselem.org/statistics/fatalities/after-cast-lead/by-date-of-event/gaza/palestinians-killed-during-the-course-of-a-targeted-killing.

  8. “…acts inviting the confidence of an adversary to lead him to believe that he is entitled to, or is obliged to accord, protection under the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, with intent to betray that confidence Protocol I, Article 37.“ (Gross 2004: 100).

References

  • Aristotle. 2000. Nicomachean ethics (Ameriks, Karl, and Desmond M. Clarke. Eds.) Cambridge University Press.

  • Bergman, Ronen. 2018. Rise and kill first: The secret history of Israel’s targeted assassinations. New York: Random House Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Gabriella, and Philip Heymann. 2010. Law and policy of targeted killing. Harvard National Security Journal 1: 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady, C. A. J. 2004. Terrorism, morality, and supreme emergency. Ethics 114(4): 772–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curzer, Howard J. 2006. Admirable immorality, dirty hands, ticking bombs, and torturing innocents. The Southern Journal of Philosophy XLIV: 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wijze, Stephen. 2009. Targeted killing: A ‘dirty hands’ analysis. Contemporary Politics 15(3): 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obama, Barack. 2013. Remarks by the President at the National Defense University. Washington, DC: National Defense University. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university.

  • Gross, Michael L. 2004. Assassination: Killing in the shadow of self-defense. In War and virtual war: The challenges to communities, ed. J. Irwin, 99–116. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Gross, Michael L. 2010. Moral dilemmas of modern war? Torture, assassination, and blackmail in an age of asymmetric conflict. Cambridge University Press.

  • Gross, Michael L., and Tamar Meisels (eds.) 2017. Soft war? The ethics of unarmed conflict. New York: Cambridge University press.

  • Halbfinger, David M., and Ronen Bergman. 2018 August 6. A top Syrian scientist is killed, and fingers point at Israel. New York Times.

  • HCJ 7015/02. 2002. Ajuri V. IDF Commander. http://www.hamoked.org/files/2010/110_eng.pdf.

  • HCJ 769/02. 2005. Public committee against torture in Israel v. Government of Israel (Targeted Killings Case) available at http://elyon1.court.gov.il/Files_ENG/02/690/007/a34/02007690.a34.pdf.

  • Heller, Kevin Jon. 2013. One hell of a killing machine’: Signature strikes and International Law. Journal of International Criminal Justice 11(1): 89–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ben, and John M. Parrish. 2016. Drones and dirty hands? In Preventive force: Drones, targeted killing, and the transformation of contemporary warfare, 283.

  • Lazar, Seth. 2017. Just war theory: Revisionists versus traditionalists. The Annual Review of Political Science 20: 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Sanford. ed. 2004. Torture - A collection. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven. 2005. Liberal democratic torture. British Journal of Political Science 36: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. 1990. Ethics - Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Mark, 2012. Rebutting the civilian presumption: Playing whack-a-mole without a Mallet? In Targeted killing? Law and morality in an asymmetrical world, ed. Finkelstein, Claire, Ohlin, Jens David and Altman, Andrew, 30–59. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • McMahan, Jeff. 2004. The ethics of killing in war. Ethics 114(4): 693–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, Jeff. 2008. The morality of war and the law of war. In Just and unjust warriors: The moral and legal status of soldiers, eds. David Rodin, and Henry Shue, 19–43. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, Jeff. 2009. Killing in war. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, Jeff. 2012. Rethinking ‘just war’. In: The New York Times: Parts 1&2.

  • Meisels, Tamar. 2004. Targeting terror. Social Theory and Practice 30(3): 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, Tamar. 2008a. Torture and the problem of dirty hands. The Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21(1): 149–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, Tamar. 2008b. The trouble with terror. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, Tamar. 2023. Debating supreme emergency: Targeting enemy scientists and the problem of dirty hands. The Journal of Military Ethics, forthcoming.

  • Meisels, Tamar, and Jeremy Waldron. 2020. Debating targeted killing: Counter-terrorism or extra-judicial execution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas. 1972. War and massacre. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(2): 123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netanyahu, Benjamin. ed. 1986. Terrorism - How the west can win. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netanyahu Benjamin. 2001. Fighting terrorism, Second edition. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  • Nielson, Kai. 2000. There is no dilemma of dirty hands. In Cruelty and deceptionThe controversy over dirty hands in politics, eds. Paul Rynard and David P. Shugarman: Chap. 8, 139–155. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press; Australia: Pluto Press.

  • Primoratz, Igor. ed. 2004. Terrorism – The philosophical issues. London & New York: Palgrave, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primoratz, Igor. 2011. Civilian immunity, supreme emergency, and moral disaster. The Journal of Ethics 15(4): 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statman, Daniel. 2003. The morality of assassination: A response to Gross. Political Studies 51: 775–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, William. 2012. Nuclear scientists as assassination targets. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Sage Publications 68(1): 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 2010. Torture, terror, and trade-offs: Philosophy for the White House. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 2017. Reflections on ‘supreme emergency’. West Point Conference. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 17–45 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3064952#.

  • Walzer, Michael. 1973. Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy and Public Affairs 2(2): 160–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1977. Just and unjust wars. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 2004. Arguing about war. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 2006. Just and unjust wars. New York: Basic Books, 4th Edition.

  • Walzer, Michael. 2013a. Targeted killing and drone warfare. Dissent.

  • Walzer, Michael. ed. 2013b. Coda: Can the good guys win? The European Journal of International Law 24(1): 433–444.

  • Walzer, Michael, and Astrid von Busekist. 2020. Justice is steady work: A conversation on political theory. Cambridge UK & Medford, MA, USA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. 1988. Ethical consistency. In Essays on moral realism, ed. Geoffrey Sayre-McCord: Chap. 2, 41–58. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamar Meisels.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meisels, T. Targeted Killing, Assassination, and the Problem of Dirty Hands. J Ethics 27, 585–599 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-023-09452-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-023-09452-7

Navigation